Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Sir Bradley Wiggins: Reaction to Geraint Thomas’s helmet comments reflect his status as Tour de France champion

"He's the Tour de France winner now, and everyone wants to know his view on certain things like he's some sort of Messiah” ...

Sir Bradley Wiggins says that the reaction to Geraint Thomas’s comments that cycle helmets should be made compulsory for riders in the UK reflect the Welshman’s status as the latest winner of cycling’s biggest race.

In 2012, Wiggins became the first British cyclist to win the Tour de France, and discovered that winning the yellow jersey brought with it a degree of fame and media attention beyond that which had previously come with winning Olympic gold medals.

His own view, expressed the following year and repeated several times since that people riding bikes in the UK should be required to wear a helmet – the Highway Code only recommends that cyclists do so – saw him hit the headlines, just as Thomas’s comments, made in an interview with yesterday’s Sunday Times, have.

> Geraint Thomas says cycle helmets should be compulsory

Speaking in The Bradley Wiggins Show vodcast which made its debut on Eurosport during the Tour de France and has returned for the Vuelta, Wiggins said: “I feel a bit sorry for him [Thomas] really, because I don't know what his views are.

"Geraint has been concentrating on what he's been trying to do – win the Tour de France. The last month he's been preoccupied with that, and all of a sudden he comes back from the Tour de France and everyone wants to know what he thinks about certain topics.

"I don't know what capacity it was asked in, but I'm sure it was just, 'what do you think about helmets?'. And just to maybe appease people, having no strong views on it, he probably thought of saying yeah, they should be made [compulsory].

"But it's caused just as much uproar by saying that as by saying 'I don't think you should have to wear a helmet' which would probably have been equal front page news.

"It's one of those things if you don't have a strong opinion on it either way,” added Wiggins, who rode alongside Thomas as Team GB won gold in the team pursuit at the Beijing Olympics in 2008, with the pair joining Team Sky when it was set up at the end of the following year.

 “He's the Tour de France winner now, and everyone wants to know his view on certain things like he's some sort of Messiah,” Wiggins continued.

Thomas himself was rather taken aback by the strength of feeling his comments unleashed on social media and pointed out on Twitter that it was just one opinion expressed in an interview that lasted an hour – albeit, the one that the Sunday Times chose to feature on its front page yesterday.

But former world and Olympic champion Chris Boardman, who in recent years has turned to cycle campaigning and is now Greater Manchester’s Cycling & Walking Commissioner, told the Welshman that it was a view he once shared, until he began researching the issue.

“Exactly what I thought when I was a pro,” he wrote on Twitter. “It’s an intuitive stance until you research levels of danger compared to other things we do helmet-less and crucially, the unintended consequences.”

Regarding the attention that Thomas’s comments had garnered, Boardman added: “Comes with the job I’m afraid, you talk, people listen.”

Wiggins also echoed that sentiment, saying: "This is one of the ways [Thomas’s life has changed]; you're supposed to have the answers to all these questions.

"Someone like Chris Boardman is far more in a position to understand all the detail around a question like that, but as the Tour de France winner Geraint's now in a position where people expect him to answer those questions."

Wiggins’ own stance on the subject of whether cycle helmets should be compulsory seems to have softened.

"I think it should be a choice still,” he said. “There's a responsibility to kids, but when you're an adult you should be able to make that decision for yourself.”

He added: "I think there are other things in terms of road safety and safety towards cyclists that should be implemented before helmets are made compulsory."

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

48 comments

Avatar
Biggie Smells replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
3 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

The research on seatbelts is considerably more conclusive than that for helmets, you know.

 

You're a bit of a helmet.

Avatar
vonhelmet replied to Biggie Smells | 6 years ago
12 likes

See 59 wrote:

vonhelmet wrote:

The research on seatbelts is considerably more conclusive than that for helmets, you know.

 

You're a bit of a helmet.

What, are we doing insults now? Grow up.

Avatar
Biggie Smells replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
0 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

See 59 wrote:

vonhelmet wrote:

The research on seatbelts is considerably more conclusive than that for helmets, you know.

 

You're a bit of a helmet.

What, are we doing insults now? Grow up.

 

Sorry Dad.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
3 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

The research on seatbelts is considerably more conclusive than that for helmets, you know.

No it isn't.  The government of the time commissioned a report to look at what had happened in other countries which had introduced a seat belt law, the Isles Report, but it was never published because it showed that overall, it didn't save lives.  Sure, some front seat people would be saved, but because of risk compensation and drivers taking more risks, more pedestrians and cyclists would die.

The effect on the behaviour of people made to use equipment which they are told will save their life is always ignored.  That behaviour changes and increases risk to other people.  I haven't checked the figures, but I was at a meeting some time ago where a senior policeman said that collisions hadn't decreased, but deaths had fallen because of vastly better car occupant protection features and emergency services.

We should be looking at changing behaviour to make everyone safer, not protecting some and endangering others more.

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 6 years ago
1 like

He’s right though. It reminds me of the ‘anti seatbelt’ brigade of dim and distant past. The ones who “weren’t wearing a ‘baby harness’ for anyone” were subject to Darwinian selection. Unfortunately the big ad campaign of the time “clunk, click, every trip” used Sir Jimmy, and I’m not sure what “clunks and clicks” he had in mind, but the sentiment had legs. Let’s get helmet compulsion legislation for bicycle / tricycle / quadricycle, through as soon as possible, and let the results speak for themselves, I say.

Avatar
darrenleroy replied to Judge dreadful | 6 years ago
15 likes

Judge dreadful wrote:

He’s right though. It reminds me of the ‘anti seatbelt’ brigade of dim and distant past. The ones who “weren’t wearing a ‘baby harness’ for anyone” were subject to Darwinian selection. Unfortunately the big ad campaign of the time “clunk, click, every trip” used Sir Jimmy, and I’m not sure what “clunks and clicks” he had in mind, but the sentiment had legs. Let’s get helmet compulsion legislation for bicycle / tricycle / quadricycle, through as soon as possible, and let the results speak for themselves, I say.

 

By 'results speaking for themselves' do you mean fewer people riding bikes, and drivers taking greater risks around cyclists?

Avatar
burtthebike replied to darrenleroy | 6 years ago
4 likes

darrenleroy wrote:

Judge dreadful wrote:

Let’s get helmet compulsion legislation for bicycle / tricycle / quadricycle, through as soon as possible, and let the results speak for themselves, I say.

By 'results speaking for themselves' do you mean fewer people riding bikes, and drivers taking greater risks around cyclists?

And no reduction in the death rate of cyclists.

Avatar
ChrisB200SX replied to Judge dreadful | 6 years ago
3 likes

Judge dreadful wrote:

He’s right though. It reminds me of the ‘anti seatbelt’ brigade of dim and distant past. The ones who “weren’t wearing a ‘baby harness’ for anyone” were subject to Darwinian selection. Unfortunately the big ad campaign of the time “clunk, click, every trip” used Sir Jimmy, and I’m not sure what “clunks and clicks” he had in mind, but the sentiment had legs. Let’s get helmet compulsion legislation for bicycle / tricycle / quadricycle, through as soon as possible, and let the results speak for themselves, I say.

Why only cycles?!

Avatar
kingleo replied to Judge dreadful | 6 years ago
2 likes

Judge dreadful wrote:

He’s right though. It reminds me of the ‘anti seatbelt’ brigade of dim and distant past. The ones who “weren’t wearing a ‘baby harness’ for anyone” were subject to Darwinian selection. Unfortunately the big ad campaign of the time “clunk, click, every trip” used Sir Jimmy, and I’m not sure what “clunks and clicks” he had in mind, but the sentiment had legs. Let’s get helmet compulsion legislation for bicycle / tricycle / quadricycle, through as soon as possible, and let the results speak for themselves, I say.

 When wearing a seat belt in a motor vehicle was made compulsory,40% more cyclists a year were killed.

Avatar
Judge dreadful | 6 years ago
6 likes

“He’s not the messiah, he’s a very naughty boy”

Avatar
Kapelmuur | 6 years ago
4 likes

I may be a tad cynical, but I wonder if he'll be receiving a goody bag from Kask.

Avatar
fenix replied to Kapelmuur | 6 years ago
5 likes
Kapelmuur wrote:

I may be a tad cynical, but I wonder if he'll be receiving a goody bag from Kask.

Yeah cos he's not going to be raking it in after his success this year. You'd sell your soul for a free helmet and a teeshirt.

It was just a throw away line in a long interview. Not thought out. He's a pro cyclist. He's not a commuter. Trust the media to blow it up to suit this week's purpose.

Avatar
Shipley | 6 years ago
6 likes

Although a helmet once saved my life, I still think they should be optional as enforcement would be impractical. 

On a road bike, I always wear one..... on my fat bike down a disused railway line....I don’t. We should maintain the choice in my opinion.

Avatar
vonhelmet | 6 years ago
9 likes

He’s not the messiah, etc etc.

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
4 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

He’s not the messiah, etc etc.

Oddly it was Bradley that was the naughty boy. Hopefully Thomas won't ever be found out to be a grey area man. 

Avatar
Rapha Nadal replied to vonhelmet | 6 years ago
3 likes

vonhelmet wrote:

He’s not the messiah, etc etc.

No, that was David Koresh.

Avatar
Joeinpoole replied to Rapha Nadal | 6 years ago
2 likes

Rapha Nadal wrote:

vonhelmet wrote:

He’s not the messiah, etc etc.

No, that was David Koresh.

 

David Icke surely?

Avatar
OnTheRopes | 6 years ago
9 likes

Comes with the job I’m afraid, you talk, people listen.”

Perhaps more apt would be, "..... you talk, people use that for thier own agendas so be careful what you say"

Pages

Latest Comments