Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Driver risks losing licence for repeatedly breaking 20mph limit

Bristol motorist caught three times in a month says she's being “made to feel like a criminal"...

A woman from Bristol says she is being “penalised” after receiving nine points on her driving licence due to being caught breaking a 20 mile an hour speed limit three times within the past month.

30-year-old Rosy Allen fears she will be banned from driving if she is caught speeding again, reports the Bristol Post.

She told the newspaper: “I just feel really gutted. I don’t think it’s fair I’m being penalised for something everyone does.”

Earlier this month, research by the University of the West of England found that the city-wide speed limit had saved four lives and prevented 11 serious injuries in Bristol since it began to be phased in during 2014.

Government figures published last year, however, suggested that four in five drivers across the UK ignore 20 mile an hour limits, prompting campaigners to call for greater enforcement.

> 20mph speed limits ignored by four in five drivers

Ms Allen was caught by mobile speed cameras deployed by Avon & Somerset Constabulary.

The force provides advance notice of where they will be each week, with the list also published by the Bristol Post.

But Ms Allen insisted: “I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed.

“It’s really disappointing. I feel the system isn’t there to help people like me.

“I’m made to feel like a criminal for doing something everyone does.”

“I know it’s not okay but I’m going 26mph.

“It’s going to destroy my business,” she added, explaining that she wouldn’t be able to visit customers in person if she were banned.

The Bristol Post reported that while some motorists in Bristol caught breaking the law by exceeding the 20 mile an hour limit could attend a driver awareness course rather than have their licence endorsed with penalty points, that option was not available to Ms Allan.

The reason? She had also recently been caught driving through a red traffic light.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

81 comments

Avatar
billymansell | 6 years ago
16 likes

But Ms Allen insisted: “I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

I would suggest that from this statement alone she needs to learn the logical fallacy of her thinking but with this statement you'd have to question her intellectual capacity for thought let alone to drive and she'd save everyone time by just returning her licence.

Avatar
brooksby | 6 years ago
14 likes

You'd think that if driving a motor vehicle was so crucial to her business, that she'd maybe pay a little more attention to her driving?  I'm sorry, but I really have no sympathy for her.

Avatar
brooksby | 6 years ago
6 likes

Now, where did I leave my tiny violin...?

Avatar
Zebulebu | 6 years ago
16 likes

"I do respect the 20mph limit"

Course you do sweetheart - by repeatedly exceeding it, and being caught doing it and penalised for doing it..

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet replied to Zebulebu | 6 years ago
5 likes

Zebulebu wrote:

"I do respect the 20mph limit" Course you do sweetheart - by repeatedly exceeding it, and being caught doing it and penalised for doing it..

I must say that line is a classic. It's like a rapist saying he respects women's rights.

How stupid is she though seeing as she got caught 3 times? Most people that get caught didn't see the cameras quick enough but still saw them. She must totally clueless and best removed from the roads - god knows what else she won't see, like kids and stuff that 20 zones are for.

Avatar
alansmurphy | 6 years ago
16 likes

"There's an old folks home half way along the road and some of those pensioners are slow to cross. I suppose I'm expected to stop running them over now, pretty pointless as they're almost dead anyway. Political correctness gone mad!" said Ms Allen

Avatar
scouser_andy | 6 years ago
9 likes

We should be talking about this more. Too many drivers see road regulations as an assault on their 'freedoms' - rather than as things that save lives.

And how is it hard to go at the speed limit when others aren't? Are they viariously pressing their imaginary foot on her accelerator. I don't understand.

Earlier this month, research by the University of the West of England found that the city-wide speed limit had saved four lives and prevented 11 serious injuries in Bristol since it began to be phased in during 2014.

 

 

Avatar
CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
25 likes

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

Avatar
oldmixte replied to CygnusX1 | 6 years ago
0 likes

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
7 likes

OldMixte wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

Does it bollocks, in any case your checking speed regularly, if you can't check your speed and continually have control/be aware of everything around you then you shouldn't be on the roads, period.

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
6 likes

OldMixte wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

That maybe so, but if your vision is so poor that you can only see 50 feet ahead, I suggest that your licence is handed in at the first opportunity.

Facts are that you should have enough information from the view ahead in order to make a quick glance at the speedo.

She really is a special kind of stupid and selfish and really shouldn't be on the road.

 

Avatar
burtthebike replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
3 likes

OldMixte wrote:

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

Who cares about the facts?  Not you, clearly.

Avatar
Legs_Eleven_Wor... replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
5 likes

OldMixte wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

No abuse, but if you can't get a good idea of your speed from outside cues like engine tone and the speed at which the surroundings are coming towards you and going past you, maybe you should think about giving up driving.  I regularly hop off the bike and straight into the car whilst still in lycra to go and pick up the missus at the station.  As I'm driving through ___________, which is a 20 limit, I hardly ever need to look at the speedometer, because I can guage my speed with the aforementioned cues.  When I do look, I am rarely out by more than 1 or 2 mph.

Avatar
burtthebike replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
4 likes

OldMixte wrote:

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

So please tell me how far you travel when checking your speed at 30mph, 40mph, 50mph, 60mph?  After all, whatever the limit is, you have to check your speed occasionally, or does this somehow magically apply only to 20mph limits?

By using your "logic" any speed limit increases risk because drivers have to check their speed.

I'd like to think of some suitable abuse, but nothing I can think of sums up your complete lack of sense in a snappy, witty way, so consider yourself abused in whatever way offends you most.

Avatar
oldmixte replied to burtthebike | 6 years ago
0 likes

burtthebike wrote:

OldMixte wrote:

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

So please tell me how far you travel when checking your speed at 30mph, 40mph, 50mph, 60mph?  After all, whatever the limit is, you have to check your speed occasionally, or does this somehow magically apply only to 20mph limits?

By using your "logic" any speed limit increases risk because drivers have to check their speed.

I'd like to think of some suitable abuse, but nothing I can think of sums up your complete lack of sense in a snappy, witty way, so consider yourself abused in whatever way offends you most.

I use the satnav that warns me, and if you care to check the research you will find the safest speed for any road is the 85th percentile not some artificial limit imposed because it seems the right thing to do.

Oh dear Research again, so boring.

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
5 likes

OldMixte wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

OldMixte wrote:

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

So please tell me how far you travel when checking your speed at 30mph, 40mph, 50mph, 60mph?  After all, whatever the limit is, you have to check your speed occasionally, or does this somehow magically apply only to 20mph limits?

By using your "logic" any speed limit increases risk because drivers have to check their speed.

I'd like to think of some suitable abuse, but nothing I can think of sums up your complete lack of sense in a snappy, witty way, so consider yourself abused in whatever way offends you most.

I use the satnav that warns me, and if you care to check the research you will find the safest speed for any road is the 85th percentile not some artificial limit imposed because it seems the right thing to do.

Oh dear Research again, so boring.

 

 

Are you the same guy who came out with this nonsense last time round?   Trying again?  If you check the research you'll find your claim is twaddle.  It's just something some US highway engineers made up.   There's no reason why non-drivers should have to accept the jdugement of drivers as to what speed is 'safe'.  85% of drivers are no more an authority than one driver.  You don't get to make that decision unilaterally.

Avatar
oldmixte replied to FluffyKittenofTindalos | 6 years ago
0 likes

FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:

OldMixte wrote:

burtthebike wrote:

OldMixte wrote:

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

So please tell me how far you travel when checking your speed at 30mph, 40mph, 50mph, 60mph?  After all, whatever the limit is, you have to check your speed occasionally, or does this somehow magically apply only to 20mph limits?

By using your "logic" any speed limit increases risk because drivers have to check their speed.

I'd like to think of some suitable abuse, but nothing I can think of sums up your complete lack of sense in a snappy, witty way, so consider yourself abused in whatever way offends you most.

I use the satnav that warns me, and if you care to check the research you will find the safest speed for any road is the 85th percentile not some artificial limit imposed because it seems the right thing to do.

Oh dear Research again, so boring.

Are you the same guy who came out with this nonsense last time round?   Trying again?  If you check the research you'll find your claim is twaddle.  It's just something some US highway engineers made up.   There's no reason why non-drivers should have to accept the jdugement of drivers as to what speed is 'safe'.  85% of drivers are no more an authority than one driver.  You don't get to make that decision unilaterally.

"It's just something some US highway engineers made up.  "

Now why would they make that up, ever heard of Pareto?

 

Avatar
fenix replied to oldmixte | 6 years ago
5 likes
OldMixte wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

Congratulations you've just made an excuse case for driving at 20.
Let's assume everything you say is true.

So if you drive at 30 and check your speed that would be 75 feet you 'didnt see'.

So definitely drive at 20.

Avatar
oldmixte replied to fenix | 6 years ago
0 likes

fenix wrote:
OldMixte wrote:

CygnusX1 wrote:

Ms Allen wrote:

“I do respect the 20 mph limit but no one drives at that speed. It’s so hard to drive at that speed."

Lift your right foot slightly off the accelerator until the needle on the speedo is hovering on/below the "20" on the dial. See? Not that hard really!

And whilst you are doing that you are not looking at the road. It takes about 2 seconds to check your speedometer and at 20mph thats about 50 feet of action you didn't see. It's just a matter of time before the defense says he had to check his speedometer and whilst doing that he didn't see the cyclist.

Waiting for the abuse as usual but then who cares about the facts?

Congratulations you've just made an excuse case for driving at 20. Let's assume everything you say is true. So if you drive at 30 and check your speed that would be 75 feet you 'didnt see'. So definitely drive at 20.

So why not introduce the 4mph limit and the man in the red flag? Speed vs safety is always a compromise, the faster you go the worst the impact, pure physics, so if you follow your argument the motorways should all travel at 5 mph? So should cyclists, they hurt when they hit someone.

Avatar
Kestevan | 6 years ago
13 likes

Awwww didums

Sounds like the sooner she loses her licence the better.

Avatar
alansmurphy | 6 years ago
24 likes

 “I just feel really gutted. I don’t think it’s fair I’m being penalised for something everyone does.”

 

Ha ha ha!

Pages

Latest Comments