- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
pollution.jpgSadiq Khan outlines ambitious plans to tackle London pollution
The new Mayor of London has announced his plans to introduce a new T-Charge” to reduce toxic pollution in central London from next year.
Sadiq Khan will try to pile the charges for the most polluting vehicles on top of the congestion charge, and further extend the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), planned to come into force from 2020.
It could run city-wide, from the North Circular to the South Circular, in ambitious plans - meaning that cars and trucks that fail to comply will have to pay £12.50 per day to travel in the zone.
A consultation will begin in the coming weeks on the proposals, but Mr Khan says he is acting with urgency, as pollution is thought to be causing over 9,000 deaths a year in the capital.
Mr Khan told the Evening Standard: "We need big, bold and sometimes difficult policies if London is to match the scale of the challenge.
“I have been elected with a clear mandate to clean up London’s air – our biggest environmental challenge.
“In the past, London has only responded after an emergency, like with the Clean Air Act, which followed the Great London Smogs of the 1950s.
“But I want to act before an emergency, which is why we need big, bold and sometimes difficult policies if London is to match the scale of the challenge.”
Mr Khan also announced that he would cancel the contracts for the Routemaster buses brought in be his predecessor Boris Johnson, saying he would bring in greener vehicles instead.
Professor Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at King’s College London, said however that the proposals were “too little and too late to provide the improvements in air quality that London needs”.
He added: “The new Mayor, Sadiq Khan’s, announcement that he will launch a formal policy consultation in a matter of weeks on a major package of measures to tackle air pollution is therefore very welcome news.”
Earlier this year we reported how campaigners announced that London needed to implement emergency restrictions on diesel vehicles, as the capital suffered a “very high” 10/10 particle pollution episode.
Simon Birkett, founder and director of the campaign organisation Clean Air in London, told road.cc diesel engines, which produce 90-95% of the most dangerous particulates and gases, need to be targeted during episodes of high air pollution.
He says people weren't sufficiently warned of the event in March, where particulates reached the maximum 10/10 score (link is external), or encourage people not to drive in the city centre, where vehicle exhaust is compounding a national air pollution spike.
Latest Comments
- mattw 4 hours 23 min ago
That's an interesting one....
- mattw 4 hours 46 min ago
I take the greatest increase being in Inner not Central or Outer London as being because much infra was previously built in Central London and...
- mark1a 5 hours 17 min ago
Controversial I know but the problems would mostly go away if the whole lot was decriminalised or legalised, dependence and addiction were treated...
- BikeyDavey92 8 hours 55 min ago
As someone who works in Insurance completely agree with this. This is why you have the product and even if everyone is well intentioned, you can...
- ktache 9 hours 34 min ago
Don't know what it was about today, maybe the banks of mist, but I received several weeks of close passes in one day.
- Sriracha 10 hours 1 min ago
I've a feeling that yellow colour attracts flying insects - either that or they're just out to get me. So the bug mesh is a valuable addition
- Hirsute 10 hours 37 min ago
At a pinch point, where the road narrows, in a blind bend, to avoid a pothole, to avoid being doored, to deter a senseless or careless overtake,...
- Backladder 11 hours 8 min ago
No more ludicrous than the UCI sock height limits!
- grumpyoldcyclist 11 hours 12 min ago
They may be limited to 50 or 60 mph, but they don't observe it and speed cameras haven't been told about the different limits....
- CyclingGardener 11 hours 15 min ago
I agree. As I said, just trying to add some context.
Add new comment
19 comments
Sadiq Khan says:
"In the past, London has only responded after an emergency, like with the Clean Air Act, which followed the Great London Smogs of the 1950s.
“But I want to act before an emergency, which is why we need big, bold and sometimes difficult policies if London is to match the scale of the challenge"
However pollution is worse today that the smog heyday of the 1950s. Boris Johnson was just very good at playing down the scale of the problem, while doing nothing about it.
[[[[[ Testsend
Great stuff guys!
The focus on private vehicles would only have a marginal effect in central London, when I've commuted around Euston & Angel I'd estimate more than half the vehicles in the evening peak on the inner loop road were diesel taxis, with a fair amount of buses in the remainder. An urgent focus on these vehicles (which are easy to regulate) would produce quick benefits - perhaps starting with making certain streets zero-emission only on a short timescale. Some comments were made about tackling these vehicles but the timescales weren't reassuring, we can't put up with another five years of the status quo, that's nearly 50,000 dead. It should be recognised for the public health emergency it is.
It does seem like you'd have to be a complete nutter to voluntarily drive through London yourself so you're probably right about that. I'm baffled though why taxis are treated any differently than private cars (being able to use bus lanes etc) as they are just a proxy for personal cars for lazy people who can't face commuting on mass transit systems with the great unwashed.
On a really niggly point, I wonder what percentage of bus passengers are truly using them to get from A to B as maybe they're not covered by tubes/trains against those having a travel card who see one passing and can't be bothered to walk 200m. Maybe a tiny incremental charge for using them would free up / speed up buses for people who do need them? If you could combine that with chucking taxis out of bus lanes and removing some of the bus lane bottlenecks then they'd become a better alternative.
I did say I'd stop moaning about this......
The Dutch system of zoning could be implimented in London. This is where, unless you have a bike, you can't directly travel between zones other than by a ring road making going by bike a quicker option. The scheme in Walthamstow that caused a huge stink when it was brought in last year was based on this system, in should be rolled out across London.
Its not just London air quality is attrocious in most built up areas even relatively small towns.
I wonder of we would sacrifice clean drinking water at the alter of the car?
Isn't there somekind of legal mechanism to take action against councils that fail to maintain clean air?
Cars are needed in London. If you work in central London almost anyone can get in via public transport but if travelling elsewhere public transport can be terrible. Try having kids and getting around the suburbs without a car. London needs fewer people travelling for work and school.
That's just making excuses. I hear so many times "oh you need a car when you have kids". The same people then go on to moan about childhood asthma going up in London. How can we expect people outside of London to reduce car usage when we have the best public transport and can't make small sacrifices?
Sorry, I'll stop ranting.
This is going to be a lot of fun to watch, just get yourself a map and look at the area covers by the north circular vs the south circular. Tom Conti will be furious.
I give it a week before the first change.org petition appears
It's a start of doing something that's urgently required...it may cause disruption in many circles, but it's good to see him starting as hopefully he intends to go on!
A bold plan would be to remove private cars completely unless electric.
Congestion charging just allows the status quo with a nice revenue stream.
That was kind of Zac Goldsmith's panacea which I found a bit depressing. The idea of just replicating the current situation with electric cars is hardly ideal. I've no idea why car ownership is up over 40% in zone 2. I live 10 minutes walk from one of the best stations in SE London and everyone on the road has a car.
The objective here is tackling pollution not congestion or road safety.
In the wider context removing cars altogether would be better.
Good for him. I've just returned to London after two blissful months in the mountains outside Valencia. First ride through London yesterday saw me coughing and spluttering my way around the streets - it's that bad.
The solution to the local problem is quite simple: get private ownership of diesels down, however politically unpalatable it is to tax them off the road.
It still won't solve the wider problem of too many people living in too small an area of the country. London is so busy these days that I can't actually think of a pleasant form of transport. Tube, bus, cycling, driving, walking... it's just a pain in the arse to get anywhere.
Ditto, I was coughing my guts up, and they have the audacity to say this is just moderate levels of pollution. 'Moderate' doesn't kill people, this pollution is killing people.
How many people do the councils employ to hand out parking tickets? How many police do they assign to 1 murder? Now consider that London pollution alone is killing roughly 9000 people per year. So by right, there should be thousands of police checking vehicles and fining owners of vehicles who are illegally poisoning people to death. Is there not some kind of gadget that can be used to spot check vehicle emmissions?
Simply implementing a toll and allowing vehicles to continue polluting won't fix anything, the current congestion charge hasn't stopped diesel vehicles so the new one won't either. There needs to be people out there checking vehicle emissions.
Yeah, exactly. Its all very well charging for nominal pollution-class of the vehicle, but I regularly see cars with something obviously wrong with them and great clouds of visible crap coming out of their exhausts. I don't believe for a moment that the nominal pollution-rating of most vehicles has more than a tangential relationship to how much crap they actually put out.
Not only are there those that are visibly, obviously faulty (do the police ever stop those guys?) its been widely reported that garages sometimes just remove catalytic converters rather than replace them, and of course the EU emissions tests have been shown to be useless anyway.
There need to be on-the-spot checks for actual emissions of individual vehicles.
That's great news he's planning it to be wider than than just very central London.
I agree... now we just need to roll it out across other major urban areas.
I still don't see that with the vast amount of public transport there is in London, why people still drive. Perhaps with a bigger price incentive for public transport they wouldn't need cars at all.
Perhaps it should be car-free with a high quality rental scheme for when people want to visit the rest of the country eg holidays and visiting family.