There may be no news about his racing program or even the team he will ride for, but Lance Armstrong is back! The rumours that swept Eurobike of an improbable return to racing for the man who dominated it for most of the last decade were confirmed late on Tuesday when Armstrong announced, in an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, that he was to come out of retirement. He said: "I’m happy to announce that after talking with my children, family and closest friends, I have decided to return to professional cycling. "It is in order to raise awareness of the global cancer burden." He added: "This year alone, nearly eight million people will die of cancer worldwide. It’s now time to address cancer on a global level." Despite winning the Tour himself seven years on the trot Armstrong’s most notable achievement was his victory over testicular cancer in the mid-Nineties, within a year of which he went on to win his first Tour de France. Although rumours of his comeback were heavily discounted by his former team, now racing under the Astana banner, speaking earlier in the day on BBC Radio 5 Live, Phil Liggett predicted his return citing Armstrong’s need for further challenges and the fact that he turned in a creditable second place in the recent Leadville 100 mountain bike race. How the powers that be at the Tour de France will react to the return of the man who dominated their race for so long should be interesting, Tour organisers, ASO, could best be described as having a love/hate relationship with the Texan with the emphasis certainly towards the latter in the years since his retirement. However Armstrong is undeniably a great box office draw and while the the Tour has tried to move on, and has done a massive amount to root out the dopers and cheats it has undeniably been tarnished by the scandals that have dogged it in the post-Armstrong era. So maybe they will find a way to make their peace with the great man. If Armstrong does race for the Astana team that will be interesting too following their very public snubbing by the Tour organisers who excluded them from this year’s race in a move interpreted in some quarters as a practical demonstration of revenge being served cold. Can he win? Well he wouldn’t be doing it if he didn’t think he could, in his favour this year’s was a pretty slow race and no-one has emerged since his retirement to dominate the greatest of all races like he did. On the other hand, ASO, under new Tour Directeur, Christian Prudhomme, has moved to dramatically change the structure of the race – changes which may not suit Lance. We’ll see. Whatever his race schedule and whoever he rides for, one thing can be certain things are going to get very interesting from here on in, and if or, as seem more likely now, when he lines up at next year’s start he will be there to win. Lance doesn’t do "first loser". Except in mountain bike races. To read the full text of Lance Armstrong’s interview with Vanity Fair click here http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/09/armstrong200809
- News
Official: Lance Armstrong says he is coming back
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
3 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
I'm not saying the officers acted with malice, just with stupidity and ignorance of physics and the law. (Once again, well done CyclingUK, who are a very fine organisation!)
@jackcycles There is no taking away or suffocating freedoms of other road users. Drivers are still free to drive. They are not and nor have they ever been free to to drive wherever they want, however they want. A cycle lane has never prevented someone from driving to a place they could previously drive for unless the plan was always to pedestrianise somewhere. What do you think about bus lanes and taxi lanes? I don't disagree that ideally cyclists simply share the road with cars. There is no question of joined up infrastructure or why cyclists aren't using the shit infra they are provided. The massive issue with that is that drivers aren't getting better, they are getting worse. Its nothing to do with cyclists and their behaviour and everything to do with motorists being absolutely unwilling to share the road with cyclists. I see this every time I go out on the bike. I see it every time I take my kids out on the back of the bike. Doesn't matter that I have small children on my bike, a large proportion of drivers couldn't care less and will bully me and put our safety in danger purely because they have the power in our dynamic. The other day within 1 minute of leaving my front door I saw a driver nearly hit the curb on a straight road because he was looking at his phone and then a middle age man cut the corner of a road I was coming to the end of so much that I had to swerve to avoid him. Drivers won't change so we have to remove them from the equation. They have to be treated like the children they are. If you can't share then we will take it away.
"...investigation will commence into alternate testing along with appropriate training for officers..." Translation: we'll try to understand the law, you know, that legal stuff we're meant to be upholding.
Do that one about "avid cyclist" => "angry motorist" again...
@andystow "Alright mate, no need to state the obvious"?
"Both the rider and Birmingham Bike Foundry have launched a legal appeal, supported by Cycling UK’s Cyclists’ Defence Fund, arguing that the process employed which led to the destruction of a £6,500 legal e-bike was “fundamentally flawed”." Good to see my money being put to good use. Keep it up! As others have said, if the police can just confiscate and destroy something which has broken no laws with no attempt to contact the owners, there is something seriously wrong that needs to be sorted out in court. I hope the owners are adequately compensated, including legal costs, and the police learn how to test an ebike.
@Mr Blackbird and what would you say to cyclists who think there are already too many motorists on the road?
Interesting the article on e-bikes having the statement that many English councils encourage pavement parking at the same time Scotland is moving in the polar opposite direction of fining drivers that do. This isnt just in the major cities either, the area I live in, Houston, Bridge of Weir which are medium sized villages have had people fined for even marginally encroaching walkways with their cars. If only English councils would follow this common sense approach. If they want to bag on about cyclists being on the roads, you have zero argument if you then allow cars to block the paths and cycle lanes you want them them to use instead.
“And what would you say to motorists who think there are already too many cyclists on the road?” "Get a grip!"?
3 thoughts on “Official: Lance Armstrong says he is coming back”
Lance is back
Second coming yesterday, maybe he world is gonna end today…
Can you imagine…
Got to be worth it, just to see the look on old Frenchie’s face if he wins.
why is this showing on todays
why is this showing on todays top stories?