There may be no news about his racing program or even the team he will ride for, but Lance Armstrong is back! The rumours that swept Eurobike of an improbable return to racing for the man who dominated it for most of the last decade were confirmed late on Tuesday when Armstrong announced, in an exclusive interview with Vanity Fair, that he was to come out of retirement. He said: "I’m happy to announce that after talking with my children, family and closest friends, I have decided to return to professional cycling. "It is in order to raise awareness of the global cancer burden." He added: "This year alone, nearly eight million people will die of cancer worldwide. It’s now time to address cancer on a global level." Despite winning the Tour himself seven years on the trot Armstrong’s most notable achievement was his victory over testicular cancer in the mid-Nineties, within a year of which he went on to win his first Tour de France. Although rumours of his comeback were heavily discounted by his former team, now racing under the Astana banner, speaking earlier in the day on BBC Radio 5 Live, Phil Liggett predicted his return citing Armstrong’s need for further challenges and the fact that he turned in a creditable second place in the recent Leadville 100 mountain bike race. How the powers that be at the Tour de France will react to the return of the man who dominated their race for so long should be interesting, Tour organisers, ASO, could best be described as having a love/hate relationship with the Texan with the emphasis certainly towards the latter in the years since his retirement. However Armstrong is undeniably a great box office draw and while the the Tour has tried to move on, and has done a massive amount to root out the dopers and cheats it has undeniably been tarnished by the scandals that have dogged it in the post-Armstrong era. So maybe they will find a way to make their peace with the great man. If Armstrong does race for the Astana team that will be interesting too following their very public snubbing by the Tour organisers who excluded them from this year’s race in a move interpreted in some quarters as a practical demonstration of revenge being served cold. Can he win? Well he wouldn’t be doing it if he didn’t think he could, in his favour this year’s was a pretty slow race and no-one has emerged since his retirement to dominate the greatest of all races like he did. On the other hand, ASO, under new Tour Directeur, Christian Prudhomme, has moved to dramatically change the structure of the race – changes which may not suit Lance. We’ll see. Whatever his race schedule and whoever he rides for, one thing can be certain things are going to get very interesting from here on in, and if or, as seem more likely now, when he lines up at next year’s start he will be there to win. Lance doesn’t do "first loser". Except in mountain bike races. To read the full text of Lance Armstrong’s interview with Vanity Fair click here http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/features/2008/09/armstrong200809
- News
Official: Lance Armstrong says he is coming back
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
3 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@mitsky I used to get a good 70-80% of my reports resulting in more than a warning letter I'm afraid these statistics are based on a highly unreliable police source: them saying they have 'sent a NIP'. You're not alone - Cycling Mikey is also now quoting 'NIPs sent' as evidence the police took real action. The infamous and essentially useless Met outcome spreadsheet only claims to provide 'intended outcome', and the reason they refuse to provide the actual outcomes is that they don't want victims to know how few of these punishments result in any penalty at all. There's a reason I'm still, 4 1/2 years after the event, battling Lancashire Constabulary and their assistants at the Information Commissioner for information about what they actually did about this: ttps://upride.cc/incident/4148vz_travellerschoicecoach_closepass/ The reason is that they did either nothing at all, or sent out the worthless advice letter. I'm now using the routinely ignored Victim's Code, and there has been no progress for years.
Cycling looks a lot safer per mile or per hour if you can remove from the statistics all the people riding on the wrong side of the road at night with no lights after a few drinks. Driving also looks a lot safer if you can remove the same sort of people from the statistics.
@Paul J Spanish police seem to be relatively lenient when the only potential harm from a dangerous behaviour could happen to yourself. What you're describing might be similar to how they react to crossing the street while there's a red light. While (AFAIK) technically it's illegal, usually nobody will bother you - unless something happens. In fact, I've even seen police officers doing that!
@KentRider how did you get Kent Police to request the video? ...how did you find out the consequences for the drivers? Very important questions! The last thing the police want is indisputable evidence, and their most valuable and most often wielded weapons are refusal to respond to reports and refusal to look at evidence- often disguised as 'we're so busy, we don't have the time'. Police inaction has far-reaching consequences: the NW Traffic Commissioner is supposed to supervise Lancashire Stagecoach and other bus companies, but as far as he's concerned if there was no police action, there was no problem and he follows the 'head in the sand' solution. Police officers really are the main enemies of cyclists. ttps://upride.cc/incident/sk19evw_stagecoach42_closepass/ ttps://upride.cc/incident/4148vz_travellerschoicecoach_closepass/
@wtjs I appreciate You've faced a depressingly unco-operative police force. The Met police, untill recently, were relatively good at taking action. I used to get a good 70-80% of my reports resulting in more than a warning letter. But now that they are getting more reports than they can cope with the hit rate is about 10% if not less.
@I love my bike An answer to the increasing number of EVs and the drivers also doing this with their plates is for someone smarter than me. Which is pretty much everyone. But I'm thinking that in the future, when an EV owner goes shopping and parks in the car park, the CCTV can catch the vehicle if it is illegal and call security and the staff can refuse to serve them. I'm also thinking larger shopping centres might offer free charging to customers so again, this can be denied for any dodgy plates.
@mitsky I've got ghost plates on my bikes. Actually, I think we all have! It saves the time, cost & effort of having actual ones ; ) I wonder how 'I'm a cyclist' motorists counter that? (Do EVs that charge at home miss out on surveillance?)
Spanish bullfighters: always wear a crash helmet.
No - you're getting confused - this is road.cc reader's wife - *much* more niche.
@mdavidford ‘reader’s wife?’ Isn’t that some other dubious image publishing from the 80’s and 90’s?
3 thoughts on “Official: Lance Armstrong says he is coming back”
Lance is back
Second coming yesterday, maybe he world is gonna end today…
Can you imagine…
Got to be worth it, just to see the look on old Frenchie’s face if he wins.
why is this showing on todays
why is this showing on todays top stories?