A driver who hit and killed a cyclist near Chollerford, Northumberland in August of last year had been told by a sleep specialist that he shouldn’t drive the day before the crash. Neil Urwin had also been handed a DVLA leaflet entitled ‘Tiredness Can Kill Advice for Drivers’ during his appointment at the sleep clinic at Hexham general hospital.
The Guardian reports that the 56-year-old forklift truck driver from East Acres, Barrasford, had sought advice from his GP in the months before the collision after suffering from obstructive sleep apnoea, which caused his night-time breathing to be interrupted, and him to wake up. This led to him feeling tired during the day and he eventually went to see a specialist.
Newcastle Crown Court heard how on August 8 she had told him that he should not drive. He was also scheduled for a sleep study and given some equipment to wear at night to record his sleep patterns. He suffered restless sleep that night and the sleep monitor caused him to wake up twice.
Despite the advice, Urwin went out in his new Ford Fiesta the following day to go fishing in Rothbury. On his return journey that afternoon, he hit Andrew Charlton while driving at 50-55mph on a straight section of the A6079.
Hit from behind, Charlton went up onto the bonnet and over the top of the car. Despite wearing a helmet, he suffered catastrophic brain injuries and later died at Royal Victoria infirmary in Newcastle.
The court heard that the section of road gave Urwin a 327-metre unrestricted view before the point of impact. There were no skid marks on the road and no signs of emergency braking before the crash.
Urwin told the police he saw Charlton two to three car lengths ahead of him and demonstrated that he gave the cyclist 54cm of space as he went past him in the car.
Richard Bennett, prosecuting, said that Urwin could not explain why he had not spotted Charlton before that moment.
“Either Mr Urwin was nodding off at the wheel before he saw Mr Charlton at the last minute or he was simply so tired he was not able to concentrate properly as he drove along the road. In short, the prosecution says the defendant’s driving that day fell far below what was expected of a competent and careful driver and it was obvious that it did so.”
Urwin has admitted causing death by careless driving but denies the more serious charge of causing death by dangerous driving.
The case continues.
Comments on this article have been disabled.
The Sentencing Council has decided that the harm of causing death with a deadly vehicle is trivial so custodial sentences to be exceptional, not an...
I don't think standard flash patterns are ineffective, no. But I'm sure that human perception of a change in flash intensity and frequency is...
£4.
No, that's very doubtful while proper testing would be fully destructive.
In that £1000 exactly scenario, beginners should probably be made aware that pedals will be extra.
What's wrong with dropping down on to the Millenium Bridge, or the swing bridge, then the brief, but satisfying climb back up the hill? #training....
The relatives might of course disagree, but in general I'd countenance a relatively light sentence* if only we could fix it so that those who...
Id forgotten that I got a second hand set of project two's for my getting to work bike over twenty years back.
My bet is that all these tires popping off are from people with bad pressure gauges or they're simply just putting too much air in on purpose. ...
David9694 - you were right! These new autonomous vehicles really are conspiring to run out of control!...