- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
3 comments
I'd get the Ridley, I love them. No scientific reason.
I'd check the reach/stack figures for both and see how that lines up with your current bike, i.e. which fits you best
The best advice is:
1. Test ride them
2. Buy the one you really want!
I've not ridden either, but performance differences will be marginal. I would test both if you can (with the same wheels and tyres, ideally), then go with the one that feels better. You'll obviously add weight and looks into the equation.
If you can't get test rides, look at as many reviews as you can, concentrating on what they say about the ride. I bought a Merckx San Remo a few years ago; it was great in a sprint, it pointed into corners beautifully, but the rear end was too harsh. The reviews said as much.
So much of how a modern race bike rides is down to carbon layup and minutiae of frame design. You can only really tell by riding them.
Enjoy!