Wiggle New Forest 100 Sunday
Now in its 7th year, the Wiggle New Forest 100 Sportive has quickly established itself as one of the UK’s biggest and best events, ’a must do’. Selling out in each one of its first 6 years, you are sure to experience a magical sportive combined with post event entertainment, a Hog Roast, refreshments and live music. The Wiggle New Forest 100 Sportive is set against the stunning backdrop of the New Forest National Park. The course sweeps through the quiet leafy country roads taking in some challenging but short hills and breath-taking views. With typical speed limits of 20mph and very few cars you will be able to enjoy the spectacular scenery in peace. The event is open to a wide range of riders and abilities with 3 route options. The spectacular scenery of The New Forest National Park combined with wild animals and picturesque villages make this a truly special sportive! - See more at: http://www.ukcyclingevents.co.uk/events/wiggle-new-forest-100-sportive/#...
I had three different cyclocross bikes before the marketing departments at various bicycle companies came up with the "gravel" category. All of...
Maybe the UK could try to reach some sort of agreement with the EU over things like international trade and such.
Cumbria County Council was a 1974 creation, merging the of old County Borough of Carlisle, and counties of Cumberland, and Westmorland - in which...
If BC want to insist on barriers then they should have their own stock loaded on a truck that they can rent out to organisers at reasonable cost,...
Well, there's lifetime bans and there's lifetime bans. Banning an 88 year old don't impress me much.
I think that is why blind eyes have been turned in the UK, internationally aswell, with things like the Redhook crits, there were many licensed...
Ahem - other esporters(?) might be rather surprised to hear that the UCI has taken over their events - I think that would be the Cycling Esports...
I wonder how he got to the game?
You'd need some good wet weather gear for that ride too.
It seems to me that the most likely explanation is that whoever provided that quote fails to grasp the difference between a "public right of way"...