A mother and daughter who both admit having close passed the same cyclist two months apart, the younger of the two motorists accepting a training course following her driving “without reasonable consideration”, believe the cyclist on the receiving end should be investigated by the police for “intimidating, aggressive and abusive behaviour”.
Tracy Haigh and her 21-year-old daughter both close passed the same cyclist on the same stretch of Ecclesall Road South at Whirlow, in Sheffield, the mother telling The Star she “pulled in a bit” to avoid a traffic island. Two months later her daughter was involved in an apparently identical incident, for which she was reported and South Yorkshire Police sent a letter offering a training course or a fine and penalty points for the “driving a vehicle without reasonable consideration to others — close pass on a cyclist” which was “recorded on camera”.
However, they have now accused the rider on the receiving end of their close passes of “intimidating, aggressive and abusive behaviour”, for which they believe he should also be investigated by the police.
Tracy said that after her close pass the rider had “screamed and shouted” at her after catching up at a set of traffic lights and had told her he “had it on camera” and she would get six points and a £1,000 fine. Her daughter said the rider was “furiously verbalising” after she close passed him as well.
“I’m a cyclist myself and when a car passes at less than 1.5m it can be scary. But his behaviour was despicable. He was very intimidating and aggressive, there are much better ways of getting your message across. If he hadn’t been like that I would have apologised,” Tracy said, accusing the man of “targeting motorists”.
She went on to claim that close passes “should work both ways” and questioned: “How many times have cyclists ‘close passed’ cars to get in front at lights?”
“Under UK law, aggressive behaviour, intimidation, and harassment, including shouting at females, can fall under various laws depending on the circumstances and therefore merits an appropriate investigation to ensure another female isn’t abused,” she said.
> Here’s what to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision on camera while cycling
Responding to the request for an investigation, South Yorkshire Police confirmed that no offence had been committed by the cyclist.
“Although you perceived the male’s behaviour to be aggressive, this on its own would not be an offence in these circumstances and no threats, abuse or insults were made,” the force explained in a written reply which also stated that the number of complaints made by the cyclist against motorists, and how many were against women, could not be disclosed as it would breach the Data Protection Act 2018.
Yesterday, we shared a video reported by a cyclist in Scotland showing the moment a motorist earned themself a £300 fine and six penalty points on their driving licence after blaring the horn at a pair of cyclists riding two-abreast before overtaking across solid double white lines and cutting back across one of the riders.

A 2023 survey, conducted on behalf of Cycling Scotland found that 97 per cent of drivers agree that close passes of cyclists put lives at risk, however over a third admit that they don’t think of someone cycling as a person, being more focused on getting past and getting on with their journey.
Eight out of ten drivers said they worry they could seriously injure someone cycling if they do not give them enough space. However, again, 30 per cent said they did not agree that people cycling have equal rights on the roads as drivers, while 83 per cent confessed to feeling frustration when trying to overtake people on bikes.
Were you the cyclist involved in the close pass incidents in Whirlow? Email us at info@road.cc

74 thoughts on ““Intimidating” cyclist angered by close passes should be investigated by police, claim mum and daughter… who both admit close passing rider”
This just highlights how
This just highlights how oblivious/ignorant a lot of motorists are towards vulnerable road users.
Yup. It’s a bit like “well *I
Yup. It’s a bit like “well *I* wasn’t scared by shooting the gun so why should someone at the other end of the barrel make a fuss? Besides I do it every day and no one has been shot yet”…
But allegedly this cyclist
But allegedly this cyclist was deliberately “targeting motorists”, presumably by riding on the road!
Quote:
Then why on earth would you close pass a cyclist?
If she really was a “cyclist herself” she’d understand the difference.
I’m guessing physics wasn’t
I’m guessing physics wasn’t her best subject at school.
I don’t think she had any
I don’t think she had any ‘best’ subjects at school.
Surreyrider wrote:
She went to school?
If Tracy Haig is indeed a
If Tracy Haig is indeed a cyclist herself and finds it scary when a car passes her close by, then she will know that there is a gulf of difference in danger between it and a cyclist passing a car while filtering. Take the offer of a course and move on is my advice to Tracy, you are making yourself look foolish.
“Sticks and stones (and cars) may break my bones but words will never hurt me.”
That said, I do think that shouting and foul language always looks awful, though I know I’ve let fly a few times when I’ve been genuinely scared.
Quote:
Oh do fuck off!
Ah, the classic ‘I’m a
Ah, the classic ‘I’m a cyclist myself’ absolution.
“I almost killed someone to
“I almost killed someone to save a couple of seconds and then they got mad at me over it and I think that’s very unfair and I am the victim here.”
If you can’t cope with being told you are a cunt, don’t behave like a cunt.
And then there’s the ‘I had
And then there’s the ‘I had to pull in to avoid a traffic island’ crap, which should read ‘I had to wait behind the cyclisty because there wasn’t enough room to pass due to a traffic island in the road’.
No, it should read, “I have
No, it should read, “I have really shit judgement and when offered the choice between being safe and waiting until after the traffic island to pass safely I decided, fuck it, i’ll have a crack at it, its not my neck on the line if it goes wrong”
“I misjudged an overtake and
“I misjudged an overtake and rather than brake and allow the cyclist to proceed safely to rectify my mistake I chose to risk their life in order to avoid ever thinking I might be in the wrong.”
“I’m a cyclist myself”
“I’m a cyclist myself”
Enough said. She’s full of sh1t & her account can be ignored.
I’m not lying! Daddy gave me
I’m not lying! Daddy gave me a tricycle when I was little and I sat on the saddle at least six times!
If you have to explain to a
If you have to explain to a motorist that filtering through traffic at 4mph isn’t the same as being close passed at 30+ mph your wasting your breath.
EM69 wrote:
You could offer to swap places. I’d be tempted to say “How about YOU ride a bike to work along this busy road and I’ll be the impatient arsehole driving a car. Though there may be more than one.”
sounds like you are an
sounds like you are an impatient arsehole whether driving cycling or probably walking
You’ve completely
You’ve completely misunderstood the post.
Default mode here.
Default mode here.
himmelsturmer wrote:
Do you know me in real life?
If not then you don’t know anything about me and you can fuck right off. And if you don’t want to give vulnerable road users enough space when overtaking then you can fuck off a bit further. Past Mars and towards Jupiter should be enough.
When a cyclist leans on a
When a cyclist leans on a car, e.g. when receiving service in a race, it is in fact exactly the same as if a car leans on a cyclist.
That’s a race not some person
That’s a race not some person commuting to work is it? It’s hardly the same thing!!!!!
Irony alert!!!!
Irony alert!!!!
Are you looking at it from
Are you looking at it from the car’s point of view or the cyclist’s?
Is the car sentient?
Is the car sentient?
Is the cyclist?
Is the cyclist?
If a bear sh!ts in the woods
If a bear sh!ts in the woods and nobody is there to smell it, is the pope catholic?
Clem Fandango wrote:
Catholic? I thought he was a freemason?
ErnieC]
That’s what they want you to think…
john_smith wrote:
ChatGPT says no…
The one good thing about
The one good thing about ChatGPT is that even if you can’t prove it isn’t sentient you still know exactly what its opinions are worth.
Get a hammer, place on a firm
Get a hammer, place on a firm surface and get “close pass denier” to slap their hand next to it. Then get them to put hand in the same place and you hit the hammer next to their hand. It’s the same right……
I assume you could be
I assume you could be commenting on Road.CC while you hammer?
The Larger Cyclist wrote:
Perhaps – if someone’s foot would do – road.cc (purveyor of socks) could partner with Timmy Mallet for a public education
broadcastvideoTikTok on this?You have to explain
You have to explain everything to drivers. That a cyclist going through a red light isn’t the same as a car. That anything a cyclists does that a driver can do will not be as dangerous. That a cyclist filter has just as much right to be on the roads as them. That most cyclists are drivers too and pay the mythical “road tax”. That traffic isn’t caused by cyclists, its caused by cars.
Yesterday I was held up massively by all the car traffic. Perhaps I should start whinging about that like drivers do.
I’ve had a variation of this
I’ve had a variation of this behaviour a couple of times with female cyclists, who have pulled out in front of me when cycling and forced me to brake sharply to avoid hitting them. Each time I yelled “woah” (or something similar) as I tried to avoid the collision, and they then make out like I’m the scary evil man for shouting.
It’s probably a good idea to
It’s probably a good idea to give any cyclist you don’t know a wide berth unless they look as though they know what they’re doing.
I generally do, but every now
I generally do, but every now and again someone still does something stupid enough to take me by surprise
Not sure how all police
Not sure how all police forces deal with video evidence but the Met police have stated they want footage 2 minutes before and after an incident.
This has now been cut to one minute each side.
Presumably to show anything that the cyclist might have done to inflame the situation.
The Met then went further to say that cyclists could be prosecuted for anything the footage shows them doing which is illegal.
So in principle we have to be on our best behaviour at all times (with regards to cycling legally) as we never know when something might happen with a driver…
So overall it is unlikely the cyclist did anything wrong as the police would have charged them.
And with regards to the difference between a cyclist filtering and a driver close passing… CyclingMikey showed it well in this clip:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikWFQquoZto
I think Jeremy Vine also had a hammer v hand clip on Twitter but I can’t find it.
http://x.com/thejeremyvine
http://x.com/thejeremyvine/status/1492768026965463040?s=61&t=wlq_RPAZ5AFe3jBf_Xl1Jw
says tweet deleted but Google found it so hopefully it’s the link above
“How many times have cyclists
“How many times have cyclists ‘close passed’ cars to get in front at lights?” = SO, she’s not a cyclist then…
I’d never dare pass a cyclist (not unsafely) or screw them over when driving…most (and know) drivers go too fast away to fast…and caution is not in most drivers minds when navigating the roads.
Fucking cyclists targetting
Fucking cyclists targetting drivers and making them pass them dangerously. Anyone that says “i’m a cyclist myself” as some sort of defence should get twice the punishment as well. Thats just admitting you know that what you did is horrible or you are simply lying in an attempt to get away with something. Either way. Double it.
Quote:
Is that like when Russia complains every time Ukraine fights back?
No, Israel not Russia.
No, Israel not Russia. Palestine not Ukraine.
President Putin says thank
President Putin says thank you for your contribution.
Israel thanks you for the
Israel thanks you for the continuing support of their genocide of women and children.
Yawn.
Yawn.
So you support Israel then?
So you support Israel then? Who have murdered far more than what the Russians have?
Or do you lap up everything the msm tells you? What a good little patriot you are.
dubwise wrote:
back at ya.
He’s right though, however
He’s right though, however you feel about Russia’s invasion, you are supporting Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians.
So Ukraine are allowed to
So Ukraine are allowed to retaliate but not Israel and before you (possibly) sprout the whole appropriate response BS, please share what you think an appropriate response would be? Are you ok with the israelis being kidnapped or killed or is that an acceptable loss in your view because as it wasn’t a huge number so we can let it slide.
“So Ukraine are allowed to
“So Ukraine are allowed to retaliate but not Israel”
Neither of them is.
“Not Russia”, “not Ukraine”?
“not Russia”, “not Ukraine”?
He’s not right at all. And neither are you.
I absolutely lose my shit
I absolutely lose my shit when I’ve been close passed.
Every fucking time.
It’s called adrenaline.
If the dozy buggers can’t work that out they really don’t have a clue.
I think the best answer is a
I think the best answer is a Cipollini bottle throw. That way you can keep your composure and still get your message across.
Could not agree more. Have
Could not agree more. Have just deleted my Twitter account because I am so sick of seeing “There was no need for you to be so angry” in comments on close passes, either experienced by yours truly or by others. With a seriously bad fast close pass one is inches, and one flinch from oneself or the driver, away from death or life-changing injuries, and they wonder why one is a wee bit agitated about it?
Rendel Harris wrote:
I’m confident you won’t regret it! Although I’m passing judgement in some ignorance (being rather a social media hermit barring this site).
Some folks on Twitter might reget your decision of course. Either for fellow-feeling or someone else to get in a lather about. Of course they can always do that here, and they do.
I deleted mine, not long
I deleted mine, not long after it was renamed to the meaningless ‘X’.
I was just fed a hatred filled stream to my timeline tailored to wind me up. It’s all engagement to Elon Musk, so he doesn’t care.
I really, don’t miss it.
Must say, two days without it
Must say, two days without it and feeling better already. Realised just how much time I wasted checking back for replies et cetera.
Rendel Harris wrote:
I’d like to follow your example, but I never got on the Twitter train in the first place. When it transitioned to X, I almost considered signing up for it just so that I could close my account.
I’ve never been on Shitter or
I’ve never been on Shitter or LookAtMeAGram.
The only reason I’m still on Facebook is the Club announcements and messenger – otherwise I’d have jacked that in ages ago too.
Social media is full of egotistical, narcissistic, gob-shite cockwombles.
a1white wrote:
I still check it occasionally for bike Twitter, and of course the World Bollard Association… but it is definitely trying to feed me some disturbingly toxic content. Videos that would reinforce some pretty unsavory stereotypes or conspiracies, such as:
That, and a crazy amount of “watch people (almost?) die” videos. I don’t interact with this stuff, and just scroll past it once I figure out what it is, but I don’t know why the algorithm “thinks” it should serve it to me.
If I can figure out elsewhere to get my bollard fix, I think I’ll delete my account today.
Wow! This could be the birth
Wow! This could be the birth of the Unsubscribe movement! (Or is it de-platforming?)
Bikestorms not Twitterstorms?
WBA is too good just to be confined to one platform (from what I see here). Hope they consider diversifying – if they haven’t already?
chrisonabike wrote:
Oh yeah, and chemtrails, anti-vax, etc. garbage. Account deactivated.
This is quite a good insight
This is quite a good insight into the mindset of drivers whatever our views on it. I would wager that a massive majority of drivers would say that a cyclist giving this woman grief was the worse “crime” out of that and the close pass.
She went on to claim that
She went on to claim that close passes “should work both ways”
I am frankly astounded at the level of stupidity in this country.
That is one the reasons for
That is one the reasons for using twitter as you find these sorts of statments all the time !
bikeman01 wrote:
I’m not. Neither am I surprised at their desire to publicise it either.
worth reading the full story
worth reading the full story in the Sheffield Star to be remided of the phrase: “peddled like billy-o”. Hope to hear this being used on team bus talks in the future and during podium interviews.
the article would appear to be a good argument for parents not to teach their children to drive
i did once suggest to a little old lady that she shouldn’d open her car window when someone bangs on it…not everyone is as pleasant as me
…She had failed to stop at a Give Way (with a reminder sign “GIVE WAY TO CYCLISTS” and then due to vehicle congestion had come to a stop across the shared path with me less than a metre away and didn’t ever look in my direction…angry yes but I reconciled the situation knowing its always the cyclist appearing out of nowhere that is the problem and that the cause of the line of cars was the existence of the shared path.
Intersting article in The
Intersting article in The Spectator advocating drivers who have a dashcam to “snitch” on littering/flytipping by other drivers.
I assume the same writer (and the paper) is happy for drivers (and cyclists) to use video evidence against dangerous driving too…
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/long-live-the-litter-lout-snitches/
Good comments on the story in
Good comments on the story in the Sheffield Star.
mattw wrote:
Yes, most unexpected. I was so surprised at not seeing the usual Gammon bollocks under a cycling-related story that I nearly stopped for a red light.