A Manchester cyclist has been caught on film riding through a red traffic light – and straight into the side of a double-decker bus he had somehow failed to spot. Thankfully, the rider seems to have got away unscathed.
The incident, filmed by a motorcyclist, happened at the junction of Portland Street and Oxford Street in the centre of the city.
As the person taking the video notes, not only did the cyclist not see the bus, but the “driver is oblivious” too as he turns right at the junction and continues on his way.
The incident is reminiscent of one filmed in London’s Trafalgar Square in January. On that occasion, the cyclist started going through the lights while they changing, contrary to the Highway Code, which says red and amber “means ‘Stop’. Do not pass through or start until green shows.”
Other vehicles were still crossing the rider’s path, including a lorry, the driver of which seems to have gone through on red, and once again the cyclist had a very lucky escape.
Even when traffic lights are green, the Highway Code tells road users to exercise caution. It says: “Green means you may go on if the way is clear. Take special care if you intend to turn left or right and give way to pedestrians who are crossing.”
While riding through a red light is ilegal, many cyclists believe it can be justified at times for safety reasons.
In February, journalist and author Jack Shenker was stopped and fined close to Holborn tube station in central London under the Metropolitan Police's Operation Safeway after going through a light on red, and he subsequently explained to road.cc why he did that.





















39 thoughts on “Video: Manchester cyclist rides through red light … and into the side of a bus”
FFS these plebs will only
FFS these plebs will only reinforce the belief for many that cyclists largely have themselves to blame.
The first video in Manchester shows why fixies should have breaks. He’s very lucky he didn’t end up under that back wheel.
brakes
brakes
Scoob_84 wrote:FFS these
that would be brakes?
Scoob_84 wrote:FFS these
that would be brakes?
–
–
Lucky that guy in the second
Lucky that guy in the second video was wearing a helmet 👿
My first thought was that he
My first thought was that he just didn’t see the lights and it was all a big mistake, but Scoob has him bang to rights, nothing hanging under cassette, no hoods, no brake, messenger bag. F U fixie douche. You aren’t Joseph Gordon-Levitt.
Less schadenfreude, more instant karma.
complete tool.
complete tool.
I don’t get it, even if its a
I don’t get it, even if its a fixie, why didn’t he stop at the red light, or before smacking into the bus?
Watch closely, actually two
Watch closely, actually two red light jumpers in the first video.
I’ve seen the second one before, and you have to be so prepared for traffic that will push through late on an amber or even red signal.
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
If you watch the vid closely
If you watch the vid closely the black cab in front goes through the red light as well
Rider is completely in the wrong but i wonder if he didn’t notice the red light and just followed the taxi through
We all make mistakes now and again and Ive accidentally gone through a red light before, due to a momentarily lack of concentration, luckily nothing was coming the other way
The second video the HGV
The second video the HGV obviously RLJ’d but not a single person mentions that. Just pointing out a cyclist who is a bit keen to go.
zanf wrote:The second video
Not a single person, except the author of the article, the person who posted the video, and most of the people commenting on it.
bikebot wrote:zanf wrote:The
Still not enough though – that ought to be the main point. The cyclist got his come-uppance for going too soon – that has to be a learning experience for them, surely?
Trouble is, the lorry driver probably learned nothing.
RLJing by motorists is too widely tolerated.
FluffyKittenofTindalos
Still not enough though – that ought to be the main point. The cyclist got his come-uppance for going too soon – that has to be a learning experience for them, surely?
Trouble is, the lorry driver probably learned nothing.
RLJing by motorists is too widely tolerated.— zanf
You’re preaching to the choir mate. But you must admit, it’s quite funny to say “not a single person mentions that”, when even the video itself has “Lorry RLJ” in the title!
And if you want to see some ridiculous red light jumping, try ten seconds after the lights change – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtTIYREyI4Q
I hear from people who know
I hear from people who know him (Manc rider) that he always stops at red lights, though often last possible minute, but in this case his brake cable snapped and he didn’t have enough distance to skid stop. Seems a fair enough explanation.
pelicandy wrote:I hear from
Yeah it does look more like a crash rather than a RLJ.
pelicandy wrote:I hear from
Looks like he has responded on Youtube. From a Charlie Baker
Looks like he has responded
Looks like he has responded on Youtube. From a Charlie Baker
[/quote]
Really?
The light is clearly on red before he passes the lane directions painted in the road.
Its not worth it. It really
Its not worth it. It really isn’t.
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
Sorry mate, I didn’t see you!
Muppet!
Muppet!
this is why anyone who
this is why anyone who advocates cyclists ok to go through on red are fools
The light goes amber at 8s he
The light goes amber at 8s he is some 20m behind the cab and it is about 5m from the lights and slowing. He doesn’t cross the red lights until 14s. He had 5-6s to react to the changing lights but he didn’t try to brake until he was in the junction. Even if the brake (singular?) failed there is no excuse for gunning the lights, either he chose to try to shoot them unwisely, or he failed to look at them (should know the route, or be riding more carefully if unfamiliar.)
Quote: the cyclist started
Somewhere there is a motorist who follows this bit of the highway code, but I’m not sure I’ve ever encountered the fellow.
[Cyclist in the (first) video does look like a kamikaze idiot, though, as ever, just think how much worse it would have been for whoever they hit had they done that while driving a motorised vehicle]
I ride through this junction
I ride through this junction most days and have seen plenty of cars run the red going right. I’ve seen cyclists run the red too but never like that. The biggest danger at this junction though is pedestrians running their red. I never seem to see many comments about that!
Pedestrians can’t run red.
Pedestrians can’t run red. The red man is a warning it might not be safe, not a stop signal. (The red bike on toucans is the same.)
What a pair of tossers, hope
What a pair of tossers, hope the skid marks last a long time
His brake cable snapped. I
His brake cable snapped.
I ran a red today. Was a bit surprised at myself, hadn’t planned it, wasn’t in a hurry. I think I was just angry at all the cars buzzing me at 30mph and wanted to get away from the upcoming box junction that was on green man phase. I was turning right; not a nice place to stand, the middle of the box. You’d be dead in a second if things went wrong. It’s all about infrastructure, in the end, after the huffing and puffing.
One brake = single point of
One brake = single point of failure.
If you are going to rely on that system, make sure you maintain it, considering it contributes to keeping you alive. Brake cables don’t just go from new to breaking under load overnight.
edster99 wrote:One brake =
If it’s fixed wheel then it isn’t “one brake” – it’s 2 independent brakes (assuming no brake on the rear wheel, otherwise there are 3 brakes). It’s like riding a freewheel and having a brake cable snap – you still have the other brake, but you’d probably want some front wheel stopping power!
He was riding like a dick though – wet roads too.
I dis like the title of the
I dis like the title of the video.
I wonder if the motor cyclist considers this to be Schadenfreude too ?
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/12963723.Motorcyclist_fights_for_life_and_three_other_bikers_hurt_in_horror_road_crash/
Housecathst wrote:I dis like
A situation in itself cannot be considered to be schadenfreude. One derives it from a situation.
And I seriously doubt he would have titled the video like so if the cyclist was fighting for his life in hospital.
I’m not buying the broken
I’m not buying the broken cable story. Thirty years I’ve been cycling and never had a cable snap or seen it happen.
fenix wrote:I’m not buying
You have a very strange belief system. Do you not believe that countries you haven’t visited actually exist? And other people – when you can’t see them, do you think that they aren’t actually there any more? Am I really writing this, as you aren’t in the room?
Bikebikebike wrote:fenix
It isn’t a strange belief system, it is a well documented one called ‘solipsism.’ You are just a chaotic manifestation of my powerful and complex psyche. Enjoy your oblivion. [save]
I’ve never had it happen, but
I’ve never had it happen, but I’ve seen people snap a cable (on an otherwise well maintained bike) on a club run. It does happen!