When we initially reported on the Smart Hat, the overwhelming response we got was that it must be some sort of joke. This has apparently been a common reaction and the cycle helmet’s Australian designer, Toby King, is rather puzzled by how cyclists have greeted his work. “I’m going ‘it’s a safety device – it's for your safety’.”
Speaking to SBS Cycling Central, King explained how his unique design had evolved.
“My thinking was, here’s something that will improve safety with the same mechanisms and devices of other road users. Brake lights, headlights, indicators. It’s a simple and intuitive system to use. And then the extension of that line of thinking was; if you’re going to put a power system in a helmet, there’s a lot of other things you can do which are interesting and useful. Ultrasonic proximity was one thing, someone gets warned when there’s somebody close to them.”
King is hoping that the Smart Hat could one day be available for A$200 (around £110) but an industrial designer has estimated the price to be at least ten times greater than that. They also pointed out that with all the various gizmos, the helmet would be extremely cumbersome to wear for any length of time. King disputes this and also appears unconcerned by a potentially high cost.
“I know people are willing to spend 10-15K on a bicycle. What’s the value of safety, or saving yourself from trauma to your head?
“I don’t think it will weigh too much either. Our heads and necks are designed to take quite a load anyway. We’ve got eight kilograms of weight in bone and brain already.
"It’s not going to be a major problem, but if it is, some of it can be put in other areas of the bicycle. And there’s not much weight in there anyway. There’s batteries, there’s an iPhone, and a display. It’s something you don’t really know until it’s been prototyped."
King describes overall reaction to the Smart hat as ‘mixed’.
“I’ve had the knee-jerk from cyclists, 'it’s horrible', 'we hate it'. But I’ve also had a lot of people saying this is a really interesting idea – you know – nobody has done a sophisticated safety helmet before, some have said, ‘where can I buy it’, others have phoned up saying they want to invest in it."
King admits that he doesn’t actually ride a bike himself – he “honestly prefers vehicles”. However, he says that people like him might be persuade to cycle if it were safer. He believes his design would help in this regard.
“It is a safety device. It makes other road users understand what cyclists are doing, it allows cyclists to understand what other road users are doing with proximity sensors and mirrors. It can only be a good thing. Which is why I’m a bit puzzled by the reaction from cyclists, when I’m going ‘it’s a safety device – it's for your safety’.”
King’s next step will be to take his design to the New South Wales government.








65 thoughts on “Smart Hat designer puzzled by cyclists’ negative response”
This is the story that just
This is the story that just keeps on giving. It must be Christmas.
bikebot wrote:This is the
FIFY
Non Cyclist designs a helmet
Non Cyclist designs a helmet inspired by a hybrid of Max Headroom and Kryton, then gets all puzzled when his ‘target’ audience react negatively?
Perhaps he should try riding
Perhaps he should try riding a bike. Also a quick bit of research on neck injuries will give him insight into the safety ‘benefit’ of his design.
Quote:I don’t think it will
Yeah they’re designed to take about the weight of head + neck.
I keep waiting for him to
I keep waiting for him to reveal that it’s all been a BrassEye-inspired wind up. A satirical look at the ludicrous state of anti-cycling feeling.
Surely…
Next step is to remortgage
Next step is to remortgage his house to get the thing into production.
Go for it, big fellow, we’re all with you, it’s a no-brainer! <:P
vbvb wrote:Next step is to
or put it up on KickStarter… and watch it fall flat…
Has he designed one for
Has he designed one for pedestrians and motorists too? It would make their journeys safer, surely? 8|
I couldn’t believe it when it
I couldn’t believe it when it was revealed he didn’t cycle!!! :O
“here’s something that will improve safety” – I think that’s where he started going wrong
“whats the value of safety” – well, that’s actually a big question, not a rhetorical question to which he expects the answer : “whatever you want to charge, mate”
I reckon the mix of his ‘mixed response’ is actually something like this : from cyclists “no” , from a few other non-cyclists who think they know it all “oh thats a good idea”
Truly, I feel a bit sorry for him that he has got it so spectacularly wrong and cant believe it. Eventually he’ll realise that he’s flogging a dead horse, but currently the whip seems to be flying. Give it up ! Give it up !
Quote:King admits that he
Wow, no sh!t sherlock!
Even Clarkson had a go on a bike out when he tried to talk to cyclists.
Please someone ask this guy what his background in head protection design is?
He is campaigning that this thing is going to be an improvement is safty – does he have any facts and figures to back this up?
I still can’t believe this is
I still can’t believe this is not an April Fool…
this idiot is actually genuinely serious…
“he honestly prefers
“he honestly prefers vehicles”
Says it all, really.
better still – make yourself
better still – make yourself a prototype Mr. King, then go out for a ride with it on for 4-5 hours and see why we are having something of an adverse reaction to it…
I think he should go ahead
I think he should go ahead and manufacture it. I just hope that it’s done with his own money and not muppetfunding, then again a fool and their money etc…
Obviously this safety expert know better than the people who are expected to part with their hard earned. Lessons have to be learnt, no matter how hard or expensive they are.
One final note, I would imagine that those who spend $10-15,000 on a bike will be looking for something more aerodynamic and less weighty for their money.
He doesn’t seem to understand
He doesn’t seem to understand how market research works. If his potential customers don’t like his potential product, the product is wrong. He needs to go back to his drawing board and design another product.
Personally speaking, I’m not buying anything that big if it doesn’t have a gyro-stabiliser unit to stop me falling off my bike. And a jet-pack to zoom me out of the way if a lorry is going to run me over. And a tranquiliser gun to immobilise any driver who does run me over, until the police arrive. His design is just missing too many essential features.
I think the registration
I think the registration plate in the picture says a lot about the mindset of the designer. “Here, wear a cumbersome neck-injury inducing crate on your head so that I can read your registration number when you do something I don’t like – uh, I mean for your own safety!”
Going to the government smells a little bit like trying to force a roll-out.
I wonder if he will want to roll it out to pedestrians too…
Mad. Totally mad. I wonder if this guy has actually tried riding a bike with a massive weight on his head to try to understand the negative reactions?
Not all of the ideas are bad. There’s just too much crammed into a too-big helmet. And I don’t want a registration plate on the back of my head. Seriously.
perhaps we are missing a
perhaps we are missing a trick here. This thing is not designed for cyclists – it is designed for rabid right-wing anti-cyclist politicians and their lobbyists (and the Daily Fail brigade).
After all, Mr King has not tried to sell this idea to us, he went straight to his state governors.
That we don’t like it may just be adding to the attraction?
I’m just amazed. If he is
I’m just amazed. If he is genuinely ‘bemused’ by the negative reaction then he really is an idiot.
Following his logic, pedestrians should probably wear something like this (with reg plates of course)…
http://www.mywaterball.com/zorb/bumperball.html
Are we sure there is not some massive corp with a vested interest behind this?
“I know people are willing to
“I know people are willing to spend 10-15K on a bicycle. What’s the value of safety, or saving yourself from trauma to your head?”
10-15k UAD? Really? Well you go chase that market then. Good luck with that.
Prefers vehicles, can’t
Prefers vehicles, can’t believe his how much research he has put into his project without finding there are more head injuries in car incidents than cycling.
Well he can always come over
Well he can always come over here and get a job in British Government, he’s clearly removed from both what the people want and what is economically viable, so he would fit in perfectly.
Perhaps should go on UK TV’s
Perhaps should go on UK TV’s Dragons Den. One of them is a cyclist so that would be interesting and perhaps make him see sense before he remortgages his house on this.
So he’s like you people arent
So he’s like you people arent listening to my great idea. Here’s an idea! Like why dont you listen to what we’re telling you???
It looks like when Homer was
It looks like when Homer was invited to design a car on the simpsons….
Let me put a box on my head
Let me put a box on my head while I think this dumb ass idea through…DDDOOOOHHHHH!!!!
Normally I feel sorry for the
Normally I feel sorry for the struggling inventors that get as far as production then go down the pan due to poor marketing / lack of funding.
When this one goes belly-up (if it gets off the ground), I will feel releived and hope that he moves onto better things that don’t involve him working / listening to people.
Whatever the designer was on
Whatever the designer was on at the time… I’ll ha…
actually i’d rather not..
I wonder if the proximity chip will also allow me to pay for my cafe stops contactless..
iPhone in my helmet. means of payment too… maybe he IS onto something…
[/sarcasm]
I actually used the feedback
I actually used the feedback mail address on his web site to say I couldn’t tell if he was joking or not. I didn’t get a reply. Maybe I shouldn’t have worded it as “or really are a complete idiot”.
armb wrote:I actually used
Ditto, I asked if it was satire and did he cycle, also didn’t get an answer.
This continues to be a great
This continues to be a great wind up. Don’t play this guy at poker.
Dear BBC
I have found you a
Dear BBC
I have found you a candidate for the next series of the Apprentice
Regards
It seesm odd that rather than
It seesm odd that rather than just making it and seeing if people buy it, he seems to want the New South Wales government to use this to introduce compulsary regestration plates foir cyclists giving him a captive market.
😕
Just needs a head-up display
Just needs a head-up display with integrated Garmin navigation and bluetooth connection to a smartphone and it’s perfect….
nortonpdj wrote:Just needs a
Not sure if my sarcasm detector is broken again but…
It has exactly that – look at the 3rd photo in the slideshow.
He must be related to Clive
He must be related to Clive Sinclair and the infamous Sinclair C5…Fail!
southseabythesea wrote:He
The hat looks like an upside down c5 with no wheels
Sinclairs not so much a fail
Sinclairs not so much a fail as the engines were widely used and copied, cant see this being copied much though….
The poor guy wakes up every
The poor guy wakes up every morning to find it is April the 1st.
has the guy designed any
has the guy designed any other products? if so, i’d love to see them.
Huh.
looks like he has
Huh.
looks like he has designed it so his display unit blocks the top of the rider’s vision of the road.
I can’t imagine that is suitable for anything other than sit up and beg bikes.
Wonder how many of those sort of riders are going to be spending around 1,000 on a helmet?
Construction quality and
Construction quality and design that is renowned and loved the world over. That Merc’s a beauty.
Anyway, it reminded me of this fella:
For commuting I like the idea
For commuting I like the idea of a brake light. Especially when taking the lane. If course , I’d prefer the light on my bike….
Are there self contained brake light units. maybe using a gyroscope ? I googled but nothing …
There are some using
There are some using accelerometers I think
http://www.amazon.co.uk/cycle
http://www.amazon.co.uk/cycle-bike-indicator-brake-light/dp/B0012S82ZY
http://www.lucidbrake.com/
http://www.gizmag.com/velodroom-smart-bike-tail-light/27937/
http://www.ebay.com/bhp/bicycle-brake-light
I’d rather buy one from a brand name like cateye, smart-phones motion detectors are likely tiny and cheap.
I think some of the German
I think some of the German lights have a brake-light function, at least for dynamo lights. So called bicycle “dynamos” are really magnetos and produce AC, so it is not hard at all to monitor the speed of the wheel spin, and to do something different when it spins more slowly.
make him wear it for a week
make him wear it for a week in the rain
Remove the absurd no. plate,
Remove the absurd no. plate, get a decent designer to redesign the shell – and there might be an interesting concept.
I hear the Canary Wharf Group
I hear the Canary Wharf Group and London First are lining up to invest in this…
I can’t believe this isn’t a
I can’t believe this isn’t a joke. The ‘designer’ is a deluded barn pot!
Wow. And I suppose I’m
Wow. And I suppose I’m supposed to be respectful and polite in my criticism of this device and its clueless inventor.
If the helmet had a heads-up display and I could call in drone strikes on some of the more boneheaded driving stunts I see, that would be interesting.
The helmet is that big…it
The helmet is that big…it must have room to carry his mind altering drugs in
Still hoping this is going to
Still hoping this is going to end in a Chris Morris style sting operation with a number of minor celebrities and politicians queuing up to demonstrate this wonderful creation.
“King rarely cycles himself
“King rarely cycles himself in Sydney. He says it’s too dangerous, and that he “honestly prefers vehicles”, but said the device could be a way to encourage people like himself to feel safer on the road.”
If he actually got off his can and cycled on the roads, he’d become immediately aware that his helmet idea is a load of balls.
I’m interested in a brake
I’m interested in a brake light now – but reviews I’ve seen so far are mixed. I think its a good idea for it to be based on the deceleration of the bike rather than a brake lever switch. (eg hitting an incline after cruising ). Now I think a good portable brake light/ rear light – reflector combo could get some sales.
It would have to be clearly visible in daylight of course.
But there are so many flashing rear lights that it would have to set itself apart – which I suspect means quite wide or long? Hmmm?
I’d like one! Brake lights
I’d like one! Brake lights are already available from aliexpress (with sensors that fit directly on your brakes) and I have considered them. Sometimes Prius and other hybrid cars can be on my shoulder before I hear them so a proximity sensor might save my life. I already have a 18650 LED light and sometimes a Gopro-clone or Ghost on my helmet and can vouch for the fact that I notice the weight little. I did mount a tablet with virtual reality racing (Ghostracer) and navigator (Google) on my bars but I found both too distracting.
Helmet front and rear lights are already common. A helmet with these built in should exist already (yes, e.g. “Urbanize Lazer”). Accelerometer brake light and proximity sensor connected warning (light/tone) would add safety. The “smart” phone rack and display should come one day.
But someone should tell the inventor the cyclists are so caught up in their image — read the comments above — that it will only be when the pro peleton starts wearing them that cyclists will follow. A cheap plastic fairing would improve bicycle speeds but hardly anyone uses them (while paying $4000 for an aerodynamic S-Works Venge) because the pros do not.
The most disappointing thing
The most disappointing thing about this story for me is this…
When I first read about this I thought “Superb! The Great Australian Larrikin is alive and well.” I really thought it was a windup, even the fact that it was pitched straight to councillors just helped convince me. I kept waiting for the grand reveal on some Australian Piss-take programme saying “Look at the tossers we have on our councils.”
Sadly I fear that I may have been wrong all the time. The Great Australian Larrikin is dead! :”(
what a tosser.
what a tosser.
If I had to wear one of those
If I had to wear one of those awful helmets, I’d probably give up cycling.
“Mr King told road.cc that he’s just trying to improve cyclist safety. Smart Hat, he said, is for responsible cyclists who want to be part of the road user community.”
Sounds like Mr King has had a ‘king useless idea to suppress cycling.
It’s hard to be certain about the real motive behind this product. Either it’s a deliberate attempt to use ‘safety’ to camouflage and justify the oppression of cycling, or it’s crap design through genuine incompetence.
This helmet is effectively victim-blaming physically manifested in a product design. While using ‘safety’ as the excuse.
It has all the signs of being designed by someone who doesn’t cycle on the road and thinks they know better than cyclists.
‘Thinking one knows better’ is not the same as actually ‘knowing better’. See Dunning-Kruger Effect for details.
Registration plates were popular with the Nazis, the Third Reich much preferred cars to bicycles, they invented the autobahn, and introduced legislation to discourage cycling. Third Reich number plate on bicycle. http://is.gd/2KbEqj
For more info, see: http://www.roadswerenotbuiltforcars.com/hitler/
The helmet is large, largely due to all the utterly unnecessary crap built-in. Unlike motorists, cyclists are only too aware of carrying excess and unnecessary mass.
Unnecessary crap includes: Visor, wiper blades which entails increased battery capacity switch and motor. – All quite unnecessary, something to break & wear-out.
In-helmet display & processor.
As helmeted-head size increases, the probability of impact would increase, substantially increasing the likelihood of additional brain and neck injuries, that would not have occurred had the helmet not been worn. Does it feature a slip-plane to eliminate rotational injuries?
What it really needs is to be able to: Suppress mobile phone use; stop drivers driving dangerously and stops drivers coming within ten feet.
[motor-vehicle proximity detector controlling a portable EMP generator]
Unless and until that’s true, it’s of absolutely no interest, even if it were given-away free.
As it is, I wouldn’t wear one even if I were paid to do so. Even on a normal, solo bicycle.
PS, It’s unsuitable for most recumbents too. (due to inclined seat and head position)
Well done Recumbenteer you
Well done Recumbenteer you have now invoked Godwin’s Law so this thread is now closed =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
The cynic in me looks forward
The cynic in me looks forward to the second version… which is basically a normal helmet with a number plate holder attached to the back.
This will be well received and before you know it, the number plate ‘challenge’ will have been addressed.
I’m actually really confused.
I’m actually really confused. Is this a joke or not??
deblemund wrote:I’m actually
that’s part of the brilliance. It’s so ridiculous yet some people seem to be taking it seriously that it’s hard to work out where it’s going.
I’m putting my money on this being a hoax. The ‘inventor’s’ 3d modelling and visualisation skills (if he did it himself) are reasonably competent so he may well have some background in industrial design. If this is the case then one of the first things he would have done is make a physical prototype out of cardboard or foam and tried it out, whereupon you’d see instantly that it was patently lethal. He hasn’t done so and has gone straight to some 3D visuals which are great for selling a half baked idea to the gullible because they make it look like a finished product.
Is it April 1
Is it April 1
Does he own a mirror?
Does he own a mirror?