A London cyclist who broke both elbows and his jaw after hitting a plastic divider is suing Enfield Council. In February 2025, Greg Simmons, a screenwriter from Edmonton, was pulling out to pass a stationary bus when his wheel hit the divider, catapulting him over his handlebars and onto the road.
“I looked to pull around a bus and the next minute I was flying through the air over my handlebars. It was just a split second but felt like it lasted for ages and I remember thinking ‘this isn’t going to be good,’” said Simmons.
And it wasn’t good. Simmons attended A&E, where it was found that he’d broken both elbows, and a later X-ray revealed a hairline fracture to his jaw. Doctors have told him he’s suffered 20% muscle loss in his left arm, and he’s still unable to fully straighten it 18 months after the incident – though he has now returned to cycling.
“My left arm is not the same as it was and I don’t think it ever will be,” Simmons told ITV.
“I’ll never have the same strength that I did but I won’t let that affect my life.”
Simmons is currently pursuing a legal case against Enfield Council. However, the local authority is refusing to admit liability, stating that the divider was not defective as it was never designed to have a pole or reflectors.
“The divider is so dangerous without a wand. It’s the same colour as the road and has no reflectors, making it almost impossible to spot when travelling at speed, especially when coupled with other dividers that do have wands,” said Simmons.
“I am lucky that there wasn’t any traffic as I could have been killed. This could happen to somebody else who may not be as lucky.”
Solicitor Osbornes Law is now pursuing a personal injury claim for Simmons, having successfully represented Richard Lander, who suffered a similar incident with a comparable lane divider in Croydon.
> Croydon cyclist breaks wrist after hitting base of cycle lane wand removed by council
“My client suffered serious injuries through no fault of his own because of a safety measure that the council installed,” said Megan Lambert, a specialist personal injury lawyer at Osbornes Law. “He has suffered considerable harm and distress, which has been compounded by the council denying liability. I would urge them to reconsider their position and settle this matter as soon as possible.”
Lane dividers have been a common feature of UK streets since the days of the Covid-19 pandemic, and this writer very nearly had an accident like Simmons’ thanks to a similar wandless divider in Bath, although its smaller size may have helped negate a full-on OTB incident.
Whether Enfield Council will pay up is still in question — bigger dividers seem to be designed purely to keep motorists out of cycle lanes without any forethought on how they’ll affect cyclists. However, they also make cyclists feel safer and reinforce cycle lanes without the council having to dig up roads.

5 thoughts on ““I could have been killed”: London cyclist who broke jaw and both elbows after hitting ‘invisible’ plastic cycle lane divider sues council”
Almost any other color would have been safer. It’s like the council said “How can we injure as many cyclists as possible and also give motorists an excuse for wandering into the bike lane?” Find the idiot in charge of this project and pay Greg out of their pension.
PS Editing is back YAY!
I have every sympathy for Mr Simmons’ injuries but struggling to muster much sympathy for his claim against the council. As a cyclist you’ve got to be scanning the road surface constantly for hazards, be they potholes, broken glass, bin bags et cetera et cetera. Would we have any sympathy for a motorist who hit a cyclist in the cycle lane and blamed the fact that they couldn’t see the lane dividers? How about a motorist who mounted the pavement and hit a pedestrian and offered in mitigation the fact that the kerb was the same colour as the pavement? Sometimes you’ve just got to admit you made a mistake.
What doesn’t really help is that the cycle lane appears to be very narrow. Any cyclist pulling out to avoid a drain or pothole would come very close to those dividers.
The dividers will be very difficult to spot in the dark against oncoming headlights.
I also hope the dividers are not installed at any point where a cyclist may want to turn right off the road, as they are very close together
@Rendel Harris that was my reflex (same as with the folks who were laid low by the Keynsham “optical illusion” cycle lane)…
… but of course it’s easy to say “I would never…” and we know (and civil engineers definitely should) that *humans* operate in the public environment.
Seems foreseeable that low, tarmac coloured orcas/armadillos might cause more problems than they’re designed to fix.
I don’t think the motoring analogy is quite fair. Cyclists already have all the tasks of motorists to deal with. Then additionally “monitoring if we’ve *been* seen”. Plus much more interest in the road surface as you say.
Ultimately cycle *lanes* – even ones with “protection” (short of concrete barriers) aren’t good cycle infra either.
The divider wasn’t defective, it was deliberately designed in a dangerous manner? That doesn’t sound like a great defence.