Contaminated steak defence works for Dutch cyclist who tested positive for clenbuterol

Rudi van Houts guilty of ingesting banned substance but no sanction given in echo of Contador case

by Simon_MacMichael   March 17, 2011  

Steaks courtesy http://pdphoto.org/

Dutch mountain biker Rudi van Houts of the Multivan-Merida team has been cleared to ride again by his national federation after testing positive for clenbuterol at the end of October.

While the national association, the Koninklijke Nederlandsche Wielren Unie, held that the rider was culpable of having clenbuterol in his system, it accepted his explanation that he had ingesting it innocently after eating a steak during a trip to Mexico.

That excuse will of course sound familiar to anyone following the Alberto Contador case, and a report of the Dutch decision on the Spanish website Biciclismo was quickly retweeted by the Saxo Bank-SunGard’s manager and brother, Fran, on the social network site Twitter.

Contador himself was cleared last month by the Spanish national federation, the RFEC, following his own positive test for the substance in last year’s Tour de France, accepting his defence that he had eaten a contaminated steak brought into France from Spain.

Like Contador, the 27-year-old van Houts engaged the services of the Dutch biochemist Douwe de Boer in his defence. The cyclist’s urine contained a value of 30 picograms of clenbuterol per millilitre of urine, compared to a reading of 50 in Contador’s case.

Although those amounts are tiny, under World Anti-doping Agency (WADA) rules there is no minimum threshold required to test positive for the substance.

While Contador is riding again, returning to competition in the Volta ao Algarve last month a day after the RFEC’s verdict, his case appears to be far from over.

The UCI has until 24 March, a week from today, to lodge any appeal against the Spanish decision with the Court of Arbitration for Sport, while WADA has a further month to decide whether to bring its own action.
 

5 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

OK, no more meat for me then... Liar

posted by crunch61 [31 posts]
17th March 2011 - 15:54

like this
Like (0)

I eat loads of meat, and my performance is not being enhanced.

Please can someone point me in the direction of the dodgy beef?!

solentine

posted by solentine [91 posts]
17th March 2011 - 16:14

like this
Like (2)

I could eat one (or better still) both of those steaks. Yum! Are they contaminated?

While I accept that a steak in Mexico has possibly a higher chance of being contaminated than one from Europe, what do I know.

Trouble is that the beef claim is now a get out of jail free card for anyone caught with Clenbuterol in their systems. Not a good situation.

bikeandy61's picture

posted by bikeandy61 [388 posts]
17th March 2011 - 17:03

like this
Like (0)

There was a piece on the news this morning about race horses in Ireland being put down due to the recession and the meat being exported for, I think, human consumption. That would provide an excuse for any athlete tripping the Dope-O-Meter for practically any substance known to "sports science." There isn't a cyclist in the history of the sport who has ever had half the shit that frequently gets pumped into race horses. Well, maybe one (Ricco, if you are reading this, perhaps stable-boy would be a better choice than barman?)

posted by handlebarcam [527 posts]
17th March 2011 - 17:16

like this
Like (0)

"handlebarcam" has done it again ! Raining outside in the "snow country " so he has cheered me up considerably !
Thought Conti got off because of the "non posted" advice rather than the speculation about levels of contamination .

Skippy(advocate for "Disabled / Para Sport")@skippydetour. blogging as skippi-cyclist.blogspot & Parrabuddy.blogspot currently on the road with ProTour Grand Tour Events .

skippy's picture

posted by skippy [383 posts]
19th March 2011 - 10:03

like this
Like (0)