The Great Tunbridge Wells Bike Ride
The 'Great Tunbridge Wells Bike Ride’ is set to return for a third year running on Sunday 13th September 2015. The ride will start at Dunorlan events field (via Halls Hole Road) at 9:00am with registration starting at 8:00am and will cater for all levels of cyclist from novice to experienced sportive riders.
The event takes riders into the heart of Kent including Hawkhurst, Hurst Green and The Weald, before returning to Dunorlan events field for the finish. There will also be a single speed section for the one-geared or retro bike fanatics.
The Routes
There is a choice of routes to choose from, 25, 55 or our longer flagship 85-mile route.
Rider times will be recorded electronically for every rider as they pass under the finish banner.
The route will be clearly signposted and uses mainly quiet roads with marshals present at some junctions. There will be mechanics and refreshments along with physiotherapists to make this an enjoyable day out on your bike.
It is a silly waste of time to make these generalizations at the same one is trying to apply specific category labels to bicycles -- especially...
Maybe the UK could try to reach some sort of agreement with the EU over things like international trade and such.
Cumbria County Council was a 1974 creation, merging the of old County Borough of Carlisle, and counties of Cumberland, and Westmorland - in which...
If BC want to insist on barriers then they should have their own stock loaded on a truck that they can rent out to organisers at reasonable cost,...
Well, there's lifetime bans and there's lifetime bans. Banning an 88 year old don't impress me much.
I think that is why blind eyes have been turned in the UK, internationally aswell, with things like the Redhook crits, there were many licensed...
Ahem - other esporters(?) might be rather surprised to hear that the UCI has taken over their events - I think that would be the Cycling Esports...
I wonder how he got to the game?
You'd need some good wet weather gear for that ride too.
It seems to me that the most likely explanation is that whoever provided that quote fails to grasp the difference between a "public right of way"...