Heidi Alexander, the Labour Member of Parliament who last year called for tougher laws to be introduced against people who cycle dangerously, has been appointed by Sadiq Khan as his Deputy Mayor for Transport.
The Lewisham East MP’s constituents include Matthew Briggs, who launched a campaign for the law to be toughened after his wife Kim was killed by Charlie Alliston, who crashed into her on London’s Old Street in February 2016.
Alliston, who was riding a fixed-wheel bike that had no front brake, was convicted by an Old Bailey jury of causing bodily injury through wanton and furious driving under the Offences Against The Person Act 1861, but acquitted of manslaughter.
After he was sentenced to 18 months’ custody in a young offenders’ institution in September 2016, Alexander raised the issue of the law relating to dangerous cycling at Prime Minister’s Questions.
She asked Theresa May: “Does she agree that the law on dangerous driving should be extended to included offences by cyclists and that the 1861 offence of wanton and furious driving, on which the prosecution had to rely in this case, is hopelessly outdated and wholly inadequate?”
> Prime Minister urged to extend dangerous driving law to cycling
In response, the Prime Minister said that the Labour MP had “raised an important issue. We should welcome the fact that the prosecution team were able to find legislation under which they were able to take a prosecution, but she makes a general point about ensuring that our legislation keeps up to date with developments, and I am sure that the Secretary of State for Transport will look at the issue.”
Later that month, Transport Minister Jesse Norman announced a two-part cycle safety review, currently under consultation, which will address not only how to improve the safety of cyclists, but also whether a new offence equivalent to causing death by careless or dangerous driving should be introduced.
> Government announces cycle safety review in wake of Alliston conviction
In December, in a written question Alexander pressed Norman over “when he plans to commence the second phase of the review of cycle safety announced on 21 September, into wider road safety issues.”
The minister, whose responsibilities at the Department for Transport include cycling, replied that a Call for Evidence would be published “in early 2018” and that “Preliminary discussions regarding Phase Two have already started.“
> Government asks for “help, ideas and evidence” on how to make cycling safer
Alexander, who succeeds Val Shawcross in her new role, will step down as an MP, with City Hall saying, “In law it is not possible for Heidi to be both Deputy Mayor and an MP.”
Observers of London politics will note that for the final 12 months of his term as Mayor of London, Khan’s predecessor, Boris Johnson, combined that role with sitting in the House of Commons as MP for Uxbridge and South Ruislip.
Andrew Gilligan, who served as London’s Cycling Commissioner under Johnson, was among those who reacted on Twitter to today’s appointment, writing: “Heidi Alexander cycles – and has voiced support for improvement. But her main recent work in the field was to lead the campaign for tougher dangerous cycling laws.”
London Cycling Campaign (LCC) told road.cc that it wanted to thank Shawcross “for her dedication and support for cycling in London,” which saw LCC members vote her and fellow co-chair of the Greater London Assembly Transport Committee, Caroline Pidgeon, Cycling Champions of the Year 2015.
“We thank Val for her subsequent efforts, as Deputy Mayor for Transport, in creating the positive approach to sustainable transport that figures large in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy,” LCC continued.
Commenting on the new appointee, LCC said: “We are looking forward to working with Heidi Alexander as she steps into her new role as Deputy Mayor for Transport, supporting her to achieve the Mayor’s ‘Vision Zero’ target of no deaths or serious injuries on the city’s roads by 2041.
“To achieve this very worthwhile aim we need to see far improved infrastructure for walking and cycling accompanied by the right legislation to ensure safe and considerate behaviour on all roads.”
Alexander, who was first elected to the House of Commons in 2010, acted as campaign chair for Khan when he was seeking selection as the Labour candidate in the 2016 mayoral election.
The Mayor said he was “delighted” that she had agreed to take up the position.
“Heidi knows this city inside-out, and her work both as Shadow Health Secretary and campaigning over the best Brexit deal has demonstrated the terrific job she will do as part of my team standing up for London,” he said.
“Heidi is respected across the political divide as a parliamentarian and campaigner, and Londoners can be confident she will ensure we deliver our ambitious plans to transform London’s transport network over the coming years.”
Alexander acknowledged that Shawcross , who retires after 18 years at City Hall where she chaired the Greater London Assembly’s Transport Committee and more recently helped Khan draw up his transport strategy and five-year business plan, would be “a hard act to follow but I can’t wait to get started.”
She added: “After eight years as the Member of Parliament for Lewisham East and six years as a local councillor, I know just how important it is we ensure everyone has access to a high-quality and affordable public transport network, with safe cycling routes across the capital. London is a fantastic city.
“I know Sadiq wants its transport system to be the envy of the world and I am looking forward to playing my part in making that happen.”





















47 thoughts on “MP who has called for tougher laws on dangerous cycling appointed London’s Deputy Mayor for Transport”
The Prime Minister said that
The Prime Minister said that the Labour MP had raised an important issue.
Are you friggin’ kidding me?
*cough* London pollution *cough*
hawkinspeter wrote:
Are you friggin’ kidding me?
*cough* London pollution *cough*— hawkinspeter
While London air quality isnt as god as it could be, its alot better than other places in the UK. Over the last few days while pollution levels have been ‘very high’, they have been in places such as Port Talbot and around areas in Essex on the Thames that have shipping.
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/revealed-uks-worst-area-for-pollution-and-its-not-london-a3828791.html
zanf wrote:
I was surprised when I first read that report. I did raise a forum post about that: http://road.cc/content/forum/241150-towns-exceeding-legal-pollution-limits-your-town-list
zanf wrote:
Interesting, though I’d rather see something that was weighted by population – how many people live and breath in each of the areas listed? How many particles are inhaled per day in each region?
London may well not be at the top of such a list either, but it would be useful to know what the ordering would be when looked at that way.
FluffyKittenofTindalos wrote:
Weighted by the correlation of where there are sensors recording the pollution would be a better measure,since the places not on the list would stand out as not having lower pollution,but not bothering to record it.
Well, I don’t live in London,
Well, I don’t live in London, so not directly affecting me, but I would find it difficult to support someone who thinks that the laws about dangerous cycling need reviewing. I’ve just checked her speeches in Parliament, and none of them were transport focussed.
“Heidi Alexander cycles – and has voiced support for improvement. But her main recent work in the field was to lead the campaign for tougher dangerous cycling laws.”
Well, I don’t want to be sizeist, but if she’s cycled more than ten feet in the last year, I’ll eat my hat. Just why does the mayor think that someone so clearly identified as being anti-cyclist would make a good Deputy Mayor for Transport? I suppose it could mean that she will have to bend over backwards to remove any suspicion that she is anti-cyclist, but with a history like that, I won’t be holding my breath.
burtthebike wrote:
There were blokes bigger than her doing the Tour de Yorkshire ride on Sunday. And that was a lot lumpier than Lewisham.
If you want cycling to be seen as a mainstream activity that isn’t just the preserve of hobbyists and athletes then it’s best not to call anyone a liar if they are over a size 12 and claim to ride a bike.
“Heidi Alexander cycles”
“Heidi Alexander cycles” Never heard of that one; I’ll continue shopping at Evans Cycles.
More proof that Khan isn’t
More proof that Khan isn’t interested in doing anything positive for cycling.
Ha ha ha ha ha! London is
Ha ha ha ha ha! London is fucked.
Good luck with that.
Maybe the Luftwaffe had the
Maybe the Luftwaffe had the right idea, level the fucking shithole and start again, ensuring the polis are all in Westminster (and the house of lords are full) and ram a big fat juicy grand slam in their laps.
The actions and inaction of government are literally unlawful and complicit in harm of the population whilst discriminating in application of the law against a group that is responsible for fewer pedestrian deaths than the pedestrians themselves.
Oh yeah, Corbyn isn’t going to fix shit.
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
I notice that your post counter is at 1660 for this comment. Can I get all Dan Brown & deduce that this post is a cunningly hidden call for an army of ‘sleepers’ to awake and ‘restore’ some king/queen to their ‘rightfull’ place?
HowardR wrote:
That very much was purely conincidental, up to 1663 now which is the year of the Farnley Wood Plot … to overthrow the monatchy.lol
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
Didn’t one of the Lords claim that building the cycling superhighways had already done more damage to London than the Germans ever did…?
brooksby wrote:
No, I think that was a some self righteous prick called Michael Dunne, supposedly a christian leader within his community https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/church-claims-west-london-cycle-superhighway-will-do-more-damage-than-the-luftwaffe-a3652441.html#comments
Though Nigel Lawson (yet another titled prick) also stated that cycle lanes would do the most damage since the Luftwaffe, it would seem that being a titled prick automatically means you come out with shite, you only have to hear the same rhetoric from Robert Winston who seemingly won’t/can’t give facts to back up his claim cycle lanes cause more pollution.
typical polis
Khan is a complete waste of
Khan is a complete waste of space. You are certainly not going to get anything out of him if you ride any 2 wheel machine, bicycle or motorcycle. Hopefully he will be voted out next time around.
Biggus-Dickkus wrote:
Err, you preferred Boris Johnson as mayor? He spent £37 million on a bridge without it being built, handing out the design contract without a proper tender process to a tennis club chum. He went ahead with building a cable car almost no one uses and also the construction of very expensive buses that cook the passengers on hot days and freeze them on cold days. He took the credit for the London cycle hire scheme, thought it’d been planned by his predecessor. And Boris only started riding a bike after being banned for drining and driving.
Khan’s quite a good mayor.
So Heidi Alexander cycles and
So Heidi Alexander cycles and therefore should understand the issues and priorities. Yet somehow despite all the cycling she is grossly obese and her main recent work in the transport field was to lead the campaign for tougher dangerous cycling laws. Every bad driver claims to be “a cyclist myself” and this mass delusion seems to be spreading, or is it just a lie?
I guess that film ‘London has
I guess that film ‘London has fallen’ was actually a documentary!
Steel frame for her if she ever gets on bike.
I really shouldn’t be saying
I really shouldn’t be saying this….. but …. I can’t help my self…
I notice that both Mr Khan & Ms Shawcoross are leaning towards Ms Alaxander – is she generating a noticeable gravitational field?
Sorry!
HowardR wrote:
yeah you shouldn’t have. That was shit.
Perhaps Heidi could
Perhaps Heidi could demonstrate her commitment to cycling by immediately pushing through the Regents Park Path? http://road.cc/content/news/241411-london-cycling-campaign-urges-sadiq-khan-push-through-regents-park-cycle
I don’t understand why some
I don’t understand why some people here are commenting on her weight when she can be quite easily despised without getting into body shaming.
My problem with her is that she used the Alliston/Briggs affair to advance her political career. I understand that Matthew Briggs was one of her constituents and was particularly noisy about the loss of his wife (understandably), but surely an MP has to work for all of her constituents? How can she justify ignoring all the people with respiratory complaints caused by the criminally poor air quality and then proceed to put lots of energy into getting an old law updated that will only affect maybe one person a year?
Hate her for what she does, not for how she looks.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Because they are cowards and it’s much easier to throw stones rather than think of a vaguely intelligent or even pertinent contribution.
It also tends to polarise any debate so that sensible views and useful facts are ignored.
Simon E wrote:
If you are talking about me then I suggest you examine your own comments and mine more closely.
I made a perfectly valid point on the basis of the evidence and you saw the opportunity to start hurling abuse around, thereby polarising the debate yourself and carefully ignoring the facts. You can always guarantee someone will barge in with a politically-correct rule learnt by rote which they feel confident they can apply indiscriminately in order to assert their imaginary moral superiority over others.
Fifth Gear wrote:
If you are talking about me then I suggest you examine your own comments and mine more closely.— Simon EDid I quote you or mention you?
No.
So I’ll not be following your suggestion.
hawkinspeter wrote:
I pointed out that she was grossly obese in the context of the claim that she is a cyclist, not as a politically incorrect “body shaming” exercise. This claim sounds spurious to me particularly in light of her anti-cycling record. She is a very good example of why we need better cycling facilities.
Fifth Gear wrote:
FWIW, it wasn’t her who claimed she was a cyclist – it was Gilligan, in the context of a mainly critical tweet. Do you think that he was lying?
Or could it just be that overweight people are still able to ride bikes? And that the world can’t be neatly divided into pro/anti cyclists?
CasperCCC wrote:
I don’t know who is lying or if anyone is lying. I suggested the possibility on the basis of the evidence.
Yes, overweight people can ride bikes but I know a lot of cyclists and I’ve seen a lot of cyclists and a reguar cyclist rarely presents as grossly obese so it is a perfectly reasonable point to make. As for the world being divided into pro and anti-cyclists I don’t remember suggesting such a thing but carry on with your strawman arguments if you want to continue to deflect from the debate.
Fifth Gear wrote:
Hello..
a) i’m a regular cyclist
b)i’m obese
c) i see people with high BMIs riding bikes everyday
d) A persons weight or appearance is no indictaion on how they will perform in this role.
e) F*ck you, you judgemental body fascist.
Deeferdonk wrote:
While I’m sure you’re telling the truth, could you just tell me how many mile you cycle every day?
Fifth Gear wrote:
repeat post deleted
Fifth Gear wrote:
Sounds to me as though you don’t think that grossly obese people can cycle. I don’t know whether she cycles or not, but I’ve seen plenty of obese people on bikes and that’s something to be encouraged, not disparaged.
hawkinspeter wrote:
Obviously cycling is something to be encouraged as part of a healthy lifestyle. I don’t know why you interpret my comments to sound as though I don’t think it is possible to cycle when grossly obese. I’ve seen obese cycle riders but I’ve never known a grossly obese regular cyclist. I would have thought we are both on the same side in that we both want to encourage more cycling for everybody and I think it is counter-productive to start attacking each other on grounds of rigid politically correct rules. I have not “disparaged” anybody.
Fifth Gear wrote:
I apologise if I’ve mis-interpreted your comment, but it sounded like bullshit to me.
I’m not attacking you at all, I’m just calling you out on a comment that I think is unfair to a lot of people. I’m not particularly motivated by political correctness – it’s just I feel that body-shaming is often considered to be socially acceptable (e.g. making fun of men with small appendages or women struggling with weight control), so I call it out when I notice it.
Like you say, we’re on the same side.
Fifth Gear wrote:
She’s also a very good example of why we need better politicians.
If Alliston was put away for
If Alliston was put away for eighteen months in September 2016, doesn’t that mean he’s probably already out of jail? Gosh, the media coverage to get his side of the story has been deafening…
Well maybe once she sees the
Well maybe once she sees the crash statistics she’ll understand that cyclists are predominantly the victims of poor driving rather than otherwise. In her previous role she was after all sticking up for a constituent, perhaps without having reviewed the DfT data on road crashes in full.
As for body shaming her, that’s uncalled for. Hopefully she does actually cycle and perhaps might start cycle commuting to her new job, in which case she’d certainly learn a lot.
Take comfort from the fact
Take comfort from the fact that Khan does nothing other than pose for photo ops and whinge about central government, so the impact of this appointment will be zero.
He has no idea what to actually do with the mayoralty and the sooner he is replaced by someone who has even half a clue, the better.
You mean the guy who railroaded through a ton of new cycling infrastructure despite very well funded and organised opposition? Yeah, I think I did.
Talk about damning someone with faint praise – I must have missed all the “quite good” stuff he’s done – what is it?
Didn’t South Park do an
Didn’t South Park do an episode comparing Boris Johnson and Sadiq Khan? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0BuPgrBwHU
When I read that she’d quit
When I read that she’d quit parliament to work for Khan, I did think the word ‘work’ really needed to be in inverted commas. Given that Khan doesn’t appear to actually do anything about transport, indeed seems to be completely inert in general, I’m not clear what ‘work’ there is for her to do.
And, no, I’m not convinced she’s really much of a cyclist. BMI arguments aside, where’s the evidence to support that claim?
Hey, not only that ill tell
Hey, not only that ill tell you about all the exercise i do. I’m not the world’s most prolific cyclist but I generally cycle 16 miles round trip, 2 or 3 times a week for commuting ( drive other days). If the weather is ok I’ll go a 30 mile or so ride around the edge of the peaks at the weekend or take my MTB round Cannock Chase. I’ve travelled down to London and done the Dunwich dynamo the last 3 years. I swim twice a week, about 80 laps a go of the local 25m pool. I jog a couple of times a week, my big Sunday run will usually be 10 miles or so (depending on what races I’m training for) I ran my second half marathon of the year on bank holiday Monday – my worst hm time ever because of the heat- took me 2 hrs to get round. Last November I ran my first full marathon in Birmingham. I attend a yoga class every Monday with my wife.
I am 17 stone and have a BMI that classifies me as obese. I have issues with food and my mental health that make it a struggle for me to keep my weight down.
I was bullied at school for being fat. I have had people shout fatty at me from cars. I have been judged on my appearance as n made to feel inadequate.
So please don’t judge people purely on their “fat-ness”. It doesn’t mean we are lazy. Life is more complicated than that.
I think this is called over sharing!
Is that enough info for your curiosity?
Deeferdonk wrote:
I certainly did not judge anyone “purely on their fatness” and I didn’t abuse anyone either, unlike you.
I referred to someone who is “grossly obese”, not just high on the BMI index, and asked a reasonable question about that person.
It really isn’t all about you but I’m sure you enjoyed your opportunity to start ranting under cover of the imaginary moral high ground you think your particular circumstances allow you.
It would be nice just to have a civilised and objective exchange of views on occasion but it seems that just isn’t possible any more.
Fifth Gear wrote:
Why mention she is “grossly obese” at all? Isn’t that judging someone on there fatness?
Your saw a picture of her and your first thought was “fat” and articulated that in a written post.
Plus you didn’t just say was obese, you said she was “GROSSLY obese”.
Sorry for pointing out that you happen to be on the spectrum of body shaming and body fascism but it does everyone good to check their prejudices.
Deeferdonk wrote:
Why mention she is “grossly obese” at all? Isn’t that judging someone on there fatness?
Your saw a picture of her and your first thought was “fat” and articulated that in a written post.
Plus you didn’t just say was obese, you said she was “GROSSLY obese”.
Sorry for pointing out that you happen to be on the spectrum of body shaming and body fascism but it does everyone good to check their prejudices.
[/quote]
If you had read the comment without flying off the handle you would realise I mentioned the obvious fact she was grossly obese in order to make a serious point where I asked a question about her fitness for the job. I said grossly obese because that is what she is and I did not mention simply being high on the BMI index as you wrongly inferred.
You seem to think the issue cannot be mentioned because that breaks your number one rule of political correctness and entitles you to start abusing others.
I have no prejudices in this regard and neither did I express any but you are hyper-sensitive about the issue which is your problem and not mine and something I can’t help you with.
Fifth Gear wrote:
If you had read the comment without flying off the handle you would realise I mentioned the obvious fact she was grossly obese in order to make a serious point where I asked a question about her fitness for the job. I said grossly obese because that is what she is and I did not mention simply being high on the BMI index as you wrongly inferred.
You seem to think the issue cannot be mentioned because that breaks your number one rule of political correctness and entitles you to start abusing others.
I have no prejudices in this regard and neither did I express any but you are hyper-sensitive about the issue which is your problem and not mine and something I can’t help you with.
[/quote]
“I’m not prejudice against fat people I just question the ability of a fat person to do a job. I’m just saying she’s fat because she is obviously fat. Look at her fatty fatty grosley fat but I’m not prejudice against fat people. Did I mention she’s fat and I don’t think fat people can do this job but I’m not prejudiced against fat people. She’s not just high on the BMI index, she is grossly fat. I just couldn’t imagine a fat person riding a bike, but I’m not prejudice against fat people. I’m not politically correct, if I see a fat woman I just come out and call her grossly obese and question her ability to do her job because of it, but I’m not prejudiced against fat people “
I got fat from about 11-14,
I got fat from about 11-14, not American fat but fat enough to get all the “get a bra” type comments in PE. Luckily I came across skateboarding which was for rejects anyway and by the time I was 17 I was looking like Iggy Pop. Follow that up with glandular fever and I’ve never been fat since.
Any time I’ve started to put weight on it’s just back off the treats and try and up the exercise.
Weird how people remember you as fat though even when you aren’t anymore. I was still fat to people at school even with a six pack.