Like this site? Help us to make it better.


Selle San Marco Aspide Short Open-Fit Sport Wide



Compelling and well made entry-level saddle, especially for more upright riding positions
Pressure-relieving channel
Two width options
Firmer than the Racing version

At every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works. Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.

What the scores mean

Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.

  • Exceptional
  • Excellent
  • Very Good
  • Good
  • Quite good
  • Average
  • Not so good
  • Poor
  • Bad
  • Appalling

Selle San Marco's Aspide Short Open-Fit saddle offers great value for money if you're after a saddle with a sizeable open channel and a choice of widths. It's not without fault, but at £54.99 it's a cost-effective option for those looking for comfort on a budget.

The Short Open-Fit Sport saddle is the entry level version of the Aspide Short range. It comes in Narrow (139mm) or Wide (155mm) – we're testing the Wide here.

> Find your nearest dealer here

We've already tested the second-tier Racing version too, with Matt finding it a decent performer. This entry-level Sport version gets a glass fibre reinforced shell accompanied by steel rails, Pullfoam padding and a Silkfeel cover. All these spec choices mean it's less than half the price of the Racing model.

I found the pressure-relieving channel effective, and the sweeping shape encourages a fairly specific 'sit zone'. This isn't a saddle you feel you can shift around a lot on.

2021 Selle San Marco Aspide Short Sport Saddle - Wide - rear.jpg

There's a little more compression in the central section versus the very front or rear, and it's supportive, especially in fairly upright positions. Perhaps inevitably, it lacks the level of flex Matt found in the carbon-reinforced Racing version.

Saddle comfort is totally subjective, but pinning myself onto the tops in a more genteel position than my more aggressive normal position produced good levels of comfort. On the drops, though, I couldn't get as far forward as I normally would like to thanks to the shorter profile.

2021 Selle San Marco Aspide Short Sport Saddle - Wide - nose.jpg

Regarding widths, the sizing follows the Selle San Marco's 'idmatch' system, which uses three measurements: your intertrochanteric distance (sit bone width), a comparison of thigh width and intertrochanteric distance, and finally your pelvic rotation.

> Buyer’s Guide: 31 of the best saddles

I found the Sport saddle comfortable for a couple of hours, maybe a little more, after which the distinct edges of the channel started to become apparent and cause pressure.

2021 Selle San Marco Aspide Short Sport Saddle - Wide - logo.jpg

By comparison, the Fizik Antares Versus Evo R3 Adaptive Saddle proved far more compliant in that area – although it's also vastly more expensive at £250.

The cover is quite grippy under a chamois – there's no sense of slipping – while the rails are good quality, if a little weighty. At 276g the mass takes a fair hike compared to the 190g Racing version, but then that saddle is £134.99.

For around the £54.99 of the Sport, you could opt for the very good, short and heavily channeled Bontrager Aeolus Comp (£49.99), while bargain hunters should also consider the Fabric Scoop Sport, which impressed us at just £34.99 – though that doesn't feature a pressure-relieving channel.


If you're after a cost-effective, good quality saddle from a reputable brand that includes a modern short design and is arguably best suited to less-aggressive ride styles, this Selle San Marco is a compelling choice.


Compelling and well made entry-level saddle, especially for more upright riding positions

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website test report

Make and model: Selle San Marco Aspide Short Open-Fit Sport Wide

Size tested: 155 x 250mm

Tell us what the product is for and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about it?

Selle San Marco says: "The new Aspide short resumes the essential shape and the unmistakable design, which has always characterized the Aspide range, but shortens its length (250mm) to make it an even more comfortable. Its shape, combined with the large central cut-out (Open-Fit), guarantees maximum comfort and adequate support of the ischiatic bones in different pedalling situations."

Tell us some more about the technical aspects of the product?


Low density foam with variable thickness structure that follows the movements of the pelvis when pedaling, for guaranteed comfort, long lasting resistance and ideal support.


Breathable covering with high abrasive resistance. It is less subject to deformation compared to traditional materials. Bio-compatible. Silk-touch surface nish. The Plus version has increased resistance and durability characteristics.


Techno-polymer: engineering polymer with high physical and mechanical characteristics (rigidity, toughness, ductility) that allow it cope with static and dynamic loads and ageing.

Rate the product for quality of construction:

Put together well.

Rate the product for performance:

If it suits your shape and riding style, you'll be happy with the performance.

Rate the product for durability:

So far so good - the materials are high quality and look like they should last.

Rate the product for weight (if applicable)

276g is fairly chunky, but acceptable given the price.

Rate the product for comfort (if applicable)

I found this comfortable for rides of around two and a half hours, and better suited to a more relaxed position.

Rate the product for value:

Tell us how the product performed overall when used for its designed purpose

Very well, especially for the entry-level or budget-conscious rider.

Tell us what you particularly liked about the product

Pressure-relieving channel, two width options, good value.

Tell us what you particularly disliked about the product

Stiffer than the more expensive versions, quite heavy.

How does the price compare to that of similar products in the market, including ones recently tested on

For around the £54.99 of the Sport, you could opt for the very good, short and heavily channeled Bontrager Aeolus Comp (£49.99), while bargain hunters should also consider the Fabric Scoop Sport, which impressed us at just £34.99 - though that doesn't feature a pressure-relieving channel.

Did you enjoy using the product? Yes

Would you consider buying the product? It would be on my shortlist for speccing up a cheaper 'runaround' bike

Would you recommend the product to a friend? Yes

Use this box to explain your overall score

Saddle performance is subjective, but the indications are that this model offers a great value entry-point to road saddles, complete with channel cutout and shorter, wider profile. The lack of flex and relatively basic padding can lead to pressure points at the sides of the channel after a few hours, but for an entry-level saddle (and rider) it's good.

Overall rating: 7/10

About the tester

Age: 30  Height: 188cm  Weight: 80kg

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for:   I ride:   I would class myself as:

I regularly do the following types of riding:

Add new comment


JMcWatt | 2 years ago

I've tried, but never got on with Selle saddles, currently using a Specialized Romin. However, this does look like something I would like to. Slighly reminecent to the old Romin but with a flatter and wider seat area. 

Latest Comments