At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I just asked Bard do just that... ...
Some years back companies [a big wave to Apple here] realised that they didn't have to make newer versions of products cheaper, despite tech costs...
Well, looks like we've figured out Martin's IRL identity....
You'll then need a specific 'indoor cycling cap' for that
It wasn't a correction - more of an enigmatic juxtaposition, wrapped in a paradox...🤔
I find Klikfix systems cumbersome too; they add weight and position the bag too far out, amplifying the effect on steering. This rack system looks...
That's obviously incorrect, it's a highway (not a motorway), you should expect pedestrians, vehicles, wildlife and even trees to be there. That...
I didn't read an awful lot into it at the time, but my overriding impression was that many were misunderstanding (misrepresenting) what a "default"...
Chris Evans? Didn't know he was a right wing twat.
Well you see there are a few trolls that refuse to stay banned and keep coming back to wheel out (pardon the pun) their anti cycling mantras and...