At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I dont think Ive made a career out of it, but I fundamentally believe it to the truth of the situation so Ill keep repeating it till anyone can...
Hahaha :-P
“More of the same please. Too many middle-class, middle-aged people around here think it’s their right to cycle on the pavement.”...
Ah, but they're used by crims! Feckless yoof probably dealing / stealing when they're not wheelying down the roads or pavements (is it them that...
The point is the design should allow for wider tyres when they are most needed.
Surely actually hitting another road user PROVES their driving was dangerous! There's no opinion involved...
I realised some time back, that if I was running a bit late at work and needed to get a wriggle on to catch the train, that I make up most time on...
Two more years Geraint?
In fact the last three Tours have started, respectively, in Copenhagen, Bilbao and Florence so the tradition of alternate years seems to have been...
Where were you on the morning of the 18th January?