At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
I am considering the Ombudsman....
Well said. I commented here just the other day that if you were to measure the actual effect of increased positivity/negativity towards cyclists...
Looks like they've flattened the first light-up bollard thing, then bottomed out on the raised kerb.
How on earth did anyone accuse you of being trollish...
Is the microphone any good?
Exactly my view. The old cheaper Shimano button wasn't great (and even then it wasn't awful) but the Campag one is much better.
True, but I imagine that (given headtube angle) forward and backward flex translates to at least a tiny amount of upward and downward movement, and...
According to Tobes of Cold Dark North we're still just in Fool's Spring.
If the theory test was "just introduced" then this story didn't happen in 2020....
I love reviews like this, because they make me feel a lot better about how much I've spent on bicycles (probably about this much total for the four...