At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
Yes, higher is better. You ever seen a time trialist some 10-15 years ago? Low aero bars and stretched out. Now they are all riding in that high...
Alex Richardsons attack mentioned in the article happened at 3pm in the afternoon. Jen George was already 2-3hrs into her ride, and escaped to an...
"If we can't park, we can't play and if we can't park, we can't grow."...
Sorry, I left my metallurgy degree at the pub....
Stick with it and remember that empty vessels make the most noise. Many of those people on social media won't even live there, they've just been...
Fuck off
That was my reaction too on another thread but actually, as mdavidford pointed out, it's probably intended to mean "the experience of being...
Given he got the minimum for culpability/harm I don't see it that way.
great to see this elitist BS soldiering along...
Not suggesting that the hub design might not be flawed in general, but it seems pretty fanciful to imagine it would have affected the outcome of...