A study of injuries to road cyclists and mountain bikers in Canada has concluded that both groups should be urged to wear body armour as well as helmets.
The study, published in a recent edition of the Canadian Journal of Surgery, looks at incidence, risk factors and injury patterns over a 14-year period among 258 severely injured cyclists in southern Alberta.
“Trauma to the head is still the No. 1 injury in both cycling groups, which underscores the importance of wearing a good-quality, properly fitted helmet,” said Dr Chad Ball, the senior author of the research paper.
“At the same time, almost half of the injuries we noted were either to the chest or abdomen, suggesting that greater physical protection in those areas could also help reduce or prevent serious injury.”
The study examined riders with severe, multiple injuries from 1995 to 2009, as recorded in the Southern Alberta Trauma Database, which tracks trauma patients admitted to Foothills Medical Centre.
In that period, 209 road cyclists were severely injured, and 49 mountain bikers.
“Street cyclists were often injured after being struck by a motor vehicle,” said Dr Derek Roberts, lead author of the study.
Some might therefore think it odd that the surgeons suggest protective equipment rather than improvements to cyclist road safety. In the words of a commenter on Calgary TV’s coverage of this story: “Maybe governments should start doing their job and make streets safe for people to cycling on. Networks of separated bike lanes would be a good start.”
As for the idea of wearing body armour, Dr Roberts told CBC News there's not much research around chest pads, but it is something for cyclists to think about.
He said: "Although we don't know exactly how effective they are, I think that they are something we can give to bicyclists that they can consider to use."
According to the study, the cyclists sampled were just 2.2 percent of 11,772 admissions with severe injuries in the study period. The majority of the other 97.8 percent were probably pedestrians or motor vehicle occupants so it’s curious that the researchers chose not to direct their attention to the road users who might most benefit from being studied.
Researchers say that helmet use frequency could not be determined from admission statistics. However it seems likely that most riders would have been wearing helmets, especially the mountain bikers. It’s therefore interesting to note that researchers found the incidence of traumatic brain injury was identical to a 1975 study in Calgary, well before the widespread adoption of cycling helmets.
Here's Dr Chad Ball talking to CBC News about the study. To be fair, in this clip, he does point out that he thinks it's unreasonable to ask road cyclists to wear body armour.

45 thoughts on “Canadian study suggests road cyclists should wear body armour as well as helmets”
Quote: ‘Canadian study
Quote: ‘Canadian study suggests road cyclists should wear body armour as well as helmets
“Cyclists were often injured after being struck by a motor vehicle,” says researcher’
Or maybe:
‘Motor vehicles to be fitted with hi-viz padding and speed limiters’?
A study of injuries to road
A study of injuries to road cyclists and mountain bikers in Canada has concluded that both groups should be urged to surround themselves with a steel safety cage with at least four wheels for stability.
The clinicians involved acknowledged that this might be inconvenient for some but suggested that the extra weight could be offset by addition of an engine…
Let’s all wear sumo suits &
Let’s all wear sumo suits & it will all be ok . . . yeah right!
I’m sure more than 258 admissions to the Foothills Medical Centre (over 14 years) didn’t get perfect treatment – why not concentrate on improving that first?
I would like to refer the
I would like to refer the people who carried out this study to read Dr Ian Roberts book, The Energy Glut, in which he states that when he worked as in A&E, he was of the opinion that because of the injuries he was seeing, everyone should be mandated to wear helmets and protective gear.
When he moved into public health research, his opinion changed with seeing the evidence that our over-dependence on cars is what needs to be dealt with instead. It is not about being dumb and treating the symptom but dealing with the cause.
As [url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=kjaHH8YR7Pg#t=138]Chris Boardman said, if there was a gun problem in your neighbourhood, you wouldnt start demanding everyone wears body armour.[/ur]
It is probably a must riding
It is probably a must riding their winters.
Another pointless study
Another pointless study provides more pointless recommendations and completely misses the blindingly obvious again #o
In other news…..your picture is back to front 😀
jova54 wrote:In other
No it isn’t! US flag (when worn on sleeves as in that pic) is always worn with the stars & stripes upper forward corner. Stems from the days when flags were carried into battle, streaming out behind the flagpole, that’s the direction the flag would take when seen from the right.
/fascinating fact of the day
Yeah, I saw that article and immediately thought that if you could move the armour bit forward, then add some more a little bit behind you and then hold it all together with a roof…
Basically it says “DON’T LEAVE THE HOUSE, IT’S DANGEROUS!!”
crazy-legs wrote:jova54
I stand corrected
jova54 wrote:crazy-legs
I stand corrected— jova54
The flag might not be the wrong way around, but it is WRONG for a caption about Calgary, Alberta (where I grew up). NOT in the USA.
Friend of mine is currently
Friend of mine is currently in hospital with traumatic brain injury. He was wearing a helmet. Helmets don’t prevent it.
cat1commuter wrote:Friend of
Sorry to hear that; better than being dead though. Helmets don’t prevent accidents, they mitigate injury during accidents.
bikeboy76 wrote:cat1commuter
I’d rather die than be permanently brain damaged.
kie7077 wrote:bikeboy76
Fair enough; you take your chances and let the cards fall where they may.
Ok sure, why not wear a crash
Ok sure, why not wear a crash helmet for driving while we’re at it. If you crash your bike, you’re probably going to get injured. If this frightens you, pick another sport….
jazzykoenig wrote:Ok sure,
One small point, not all cyclists are involved in sport, just like many motorists are not racers. Lots of people ride bikes to get from A to B. “pick another sport” could be translated to “take the car instead, its safer” and many already subscribe to this mindset.
(No subject)
:)) =D>
I have considered whether or
I have considered whether or not to wear body armour while riding. After careful consideration of the pros and cons, I have decided to limit my use of it to lift-assisted mountain biking where the advantages of the added protection are most obvious, and where the considerable weight and comfort disadvantages are off-set by the bulk of the height gain being mechanically-assisted.
Next.
Is it 1st April???
Is it 1st April???
And what is the likelyhood
And what is the likelyhood that a cyclist wearing bodyarmour would be exposing themselves to a higher risk of heat stroke in hot weather.
“Although we don’t know
“Although we don’t know exactly how effective they are”
This is from a person qualified as a doctor; ask yourself, would he recommend a medicine in the same way?
Fool.
sometimes road.cc, I suspect
sometimes road.cc, I suspect you’re trolling us with articles like this.
“Street cyclists were often
:/
Obvious conclusion: no one should cycle, it’s far too dangerous. And don’t even think about walking anywhere without full head to toe body armour.
Oh, I know, cars should have external air bags fitted so that when they mow down people, they hurt them as bit less.
And the car could drop a mobile phone which calls for an ambulance because stopping is such an inconvenience.
I have noticed that many
I have noticed that many accidents involve a mismatch in vehicle size, and invariably the larger vehicle’s occupants come off best.
I therefore conclude that the best way to reduce occupant injury is to limit road use to only vehicles weighing as much as the heaviest available.
I’m starting design work now on a 44 ton shield that will fit over a bike, car or van to protect it when hit by a fully fully laden artic.
In the event of a large take up of ex-MoD Challenger tanks I will upgrade the shield accordingly.
Horse riders are already
Horse riders are already wearing air jackets so im sure its only a matter of time before we are being pressured to wear them too.
Does the assertion from this horse rider also sound tediously familiar?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23983566
Some Fella wrote:Horse riders
They’re not mandatory though.
“Bubble wrap, bubble wrap,
“Bubble wrap, bubble wrap, come and get your lovely bubble wrap.
You can use it single thickness or double thickness or even 4x thickness.
This product is a one hit wonder and should only be used once. The application of any kind of sticky tape or anything else will immediate void the warrenty. The use for anything else other that it should be used for will void the warrenty. This product is guaranteed pointless.”
Initially I thought that this
Initially I thought that this study was just making the same rookie mistake that most safety studies carried out by doctors make – drawing conclusions only from the consequences of injury without looking into the real world risk of receiving that injury in the first place. Then I spotted this, quoted in the second section…
…which changed my conclusion completely. I’ve decided that the only way for me to stay safe in the future is to never ride my bike in Canada.
Sorry I saw the title then
Sorry I saw the title then the picture of the ‘Merican’ soldiers and I cant get the ‘Blame Canada’ song out of my head 🙂
Stop driving cars into
Stop driving cars into cyclists and we wouldn’t need it!
I have a plan, If I ditch the
I have a plan, If I ditch the cycle clothing and ride as the Michelin Man its win win. I could get free tyres from Michelin as a mobile advert and then when some dippy car driver puts me on the deck I can walk-cycle away unscathed, result!! 😀
60kg lean keen climbing
Er did you see Ghostbusters and what happened to Mr Stay-Puft.
Great choice of photo – not
Great choice of photo – not only is it American, but flopped so the flag is backwards. I know, Blame the UK!
The 26-68x injury rate per
The 26-68x injury rate per kilometre cycling vs motor vehicle stat is the kind of thing that gets quoted around and feeds the “cycling is dangerous” mindset. These numbers have to be carefully controlled though, and these smack of an apples to oranges comparison – a km to km comparison of car vs bike incidences (including large numbers of motorway kms for a car, and large numbers of tiny bike kms for kids) is clearly meaningless.
The source of the numbers are in many ways flagging Toronto as worse than other places (abstract below). Also the fact that they find falls & injuries are more common on sidewalks suggests to me that they are including kids cycling to school on the pavement/sidewalk, short distance, low skill, many accidents. If you lump these into your commuter cyclist accident rate it’s no wonder the data looks crazy.
“This analysis uses data from a survey of Toronto commuter cyclists that collected information regarding accident history as well as regular commute route to work or school. By relating the route information of the 1196 respondents to facility attributes in a Geographic Information System (GIS), defensible estimates of travel exposure on roads, off-road paths and sidewalks were developed. The rate of collision on off-road paths and sidewalks was lower than for roads. The relative rates for falls and injuries suggest these events are least common on-road followed by off-road paths, and finally most common on sidewalks. The rate of major injuries, an injury that required medical attention, was greatest on sidewalks and the difference between paths and sidewalks was negligible. These rates suggest a need for detailed analysis of sidewalk and off-road path bicycle safety. The absolute event rates per bicycle kilometer were found to be between 26 and 68 times higher than similar rates for automobile travel, re-confirming the urgent bicycle safety crisis. Examination of rates for sub-groups of cyclists suggest that experience is an important factor in bicycle safety. The same survey conducted in Ottawa, Canada found event rates much lower than Toronto. This result may confirm urban form, traffic levels and attitude do affect bicycle safety. The analysis also demonstrates a successful method to quantify bicycle travel exposure information and should be considered for further use as complement to other existing techniques.”
This has got too dull….Sighs…
Result of study: Cyclists
Result of study: Cyclists should start driving cars instead
Bicycle riders need to be
Bicycle riders need to be endowed with supernatural powers to enable the cars of dangerous and rude drivers to be lifted up and safely placed nose down in a ditch.
CanAmSteve read Crazy-Legs
CanAmSteve read Crazy-Legs post further up. But yes it is an ‘Merican’ flag
Thx – still the wrong
Thx – still the wrong country, but the flag is “flying into battle” correctly
Why are doctors and other
Why are doctors and other self-appointed “experts” on traffic safety so obsessed with cyclists?
What about pedestrians? Should they be wearing body armour, too? No doubt it would save even more lives.
The idea would be incredibly popular with general public.
The whole study is just a waste of time and a distraction from the real problems.
The best improvement in road
The best improvement in road safety would come from removing all seat belts and air bags from cars and installing a large and lethal spike in the centre of the steering wheel in place of the horn button. Might make drivers a little more respectful of road conditions.
Batch.
batch wrote:The best
‘I am sorry m’lord but the cyclist swerved in front of me so I ran over him instead of braking and impaling myself.’
See I can be facetious too.
batch wrote:The best
[[[[ Yup…and balsa-wood bodywork.
P.R.
The helmet lot seem unusually
The helmet lot seem unusually quiet on this one, given there doesn’t seem to be any objective difference between the suggestions here and their ideas.
Why do I get they’ll have conveniently forgotten this next time some oppurtunity to tell someone about how you split yours in two once comes up.
Maybe the next step should be making Wiggo wear armour. After all if he doesn’t he’s got no one else to blame? Am I right?
All new cars should be made
All new cars should be made of marshmallow, that way you could combine a collision with a quick snack :B
Some great research
Some great research conclusions there…
““Trauma to the head is still the No. 1 injury in both cycling groups, which underscores the importance of wearing a good-quality, properly fitted helmet,” said Dr Chad Ball”
Followed by
“researchers found the incidence of traumatic brain injury was identical to a 1975 study in Calgary, well before the widespread adoption of cycling helmets.”
So they’re obviously making a difference then…
I do worry about this safety
I do worry about this safety culture that is thrown at us. My kids use power tools to build stuff ride there bikes – invented skeleton skateboarding down our close.
Maybe I should just wrap them in bubble wrap, sit them on a chair and place an exclusion zone round them which allows for nothing to enter the zone.
i wonder where the balance is