Please note that our live blog can sometimes be slow to load and you may need to refresh your browser if it seems to be taking too long.
Live blog: Team Sunweb channel Mission Impossible, swerving cyclist intentionally blocking car infuriates social media (but is all as it seems?),+ more
All the news from the site and beyond as we start a new week (and month)
Mon, Oct 01, 2018 14:22
Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
12 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
lesterama 1 hour ago
But will FLAs catch on more than BOLAs?
mdavidford 2 hours ago
'Blinking Orange Lights of Absolution' please - you know we're all sticklers for correct usage around here.
Surreyrider 2 hours ago
Road CC - surely you know that the flashing lights of absolution mean all rules and laws are suspended. Although to be fair, in Surrey they don't bother and just park in bike lanes because nobody ever stops them.
Surreyrider 2 hours ago
That headline is misleading - it's not what he said, as the quotes in the story confirm.
mdavidford 2 hours ago
Or a mirror?
tomlew 3 hours ago
Poor derailleur. Took a few kicks in the shifter's stead :(
OnYerBike 3 hours ago
@Pub bike The photos aren't Tom Pidcock's bike/shifter - they are just images of the same shifters he uses (SRAM Red AXS) from road.cc's image library, from when road.cc reviewed that groupset a couple of years ago. It would appear that all the photos from that review clearly showing the bonus button (a feature which is highly pertinent to the story) happen to be of the left-hand shifter (presumable because the photoshoot was set up with the background on that side of the bike). You can use your imagination to picture what the right-hand shifter might look like.
Pub bike 4 hours ago
The left hand shifter is pictured twice above which is confusing as it was the RH shifter which had the problem. It would be really good if there was a photo of the offending piece of asphalt. And maybe someone stamping on it in a rage?
mctrials23 4 hours ago
All I could think of watching that crash was how nice it would be to have that rain here in the UK at the moment.
wtjs 4 hours ago
@Sriracha Too bad the Police themselves, whose job it is to discriminate between legal and illegal and promote public understanding of the same, don’t know the difference They certainly don't know the difference between criminal offences proven by indisputable evidence, and reports they can just ignore with no action required - to the police they're the same thing. While preparing today for our Britain in Bloom regional Judgement Day I looked at the parish council notices display case. There was a Lancashire Constabulary poster urging people to report offences to the Neighbourhood Policing Team. I know, as result of choosing offences to report where I am not prevented from finding out what they actually did, the fate of those reports: straight into the bin
12 thoughts on “Live blog: Team Sunweb channel Mission Impossible, swerving cyclist intentionally blocking car infuriates social media (but is all as it seems?),+ more”
Hmmmm….the swerving cyclist
Hmmmm….the swerving cyclist?
Any video we post to a police authority as evidence of dodgy driving needs to contain at least 5mins of video prior to the alledged incident? Unless the OP has this additional content that shows them driving along minding his own business and being viciously swerved infront of by this cyclist then I’d be healthily sceptical of the nature of this clip.
Riders rarely (I won’t say never!) go off on one at a vehicle putting themselves in very significant danger without due cause?
No sound on the video so can
No sound on the video so can’t tell if the car is beeping or not.
…additionally it’s no
…additionally it’s no longer accessible on Faceache #justsaying
boardmad wrote:
It’s still on FB, just went for a look.
The other day, I was watching The Purge TV series, and was discussing with the better half, as to whether we thought that if murder was legal for one night of the year, would we or anyone we know actually go out and kill. Given the comments on the FB post, I would suggest not riding on Purge night.
I’ve seen it so many times on forums, but it still worries me how many people think that its OK to suggest murdering someone, because they ride a bike.
My bad…I don’t use the
My bad…I don’t use the facebook so am probably doing it wrong.
I’ve given up being disappointed with heinous driving behaviours…I got yelled at, then swerved and brake-tested coming into town last week just because I filtered infront of stationary traffic at a light then had the temerity to be infront of a van who objected on principle to my existence.
If I’d got that wrong and come off infront of traffic behind me, that van driver would have killed someone…plain and simple.
Swerving cyclist – I’d says
Swerving cyclist – I’d says he’s being a bit of a dick.
I’d find it hard to defend
I’d find it hard to defend the cyclist – if the driver behind is being a dick then it is usually better to let them get ahead and away from you as soon as possible. Nothing good can come from swerving like that in front of a driver.
But there must have been a trigger to the behaviour – interesting that there is no sound and no earlier footage. It looks like the video was taken on a phone rather than a dashcam, so why was the passenger (I’m assuming) filming at that point unless there had been an earlier incident between the cyclist and the driver?
Any other comments on the internet about this? The facebook post only seems to have about 5 replies, which isn’t what I was expecting from the title which suggested social media was erupting over this.
There’s reference to an
There’s reference to an original video which shows more of the story, plus a comment about the driver *thinking* he had given them enough room. Has anyone seen it? The hate and the violence on that FB thread is too depressing to trawl through to see if anyone linked it.
The guy is a major cock, if
The guy is a major cock, if just for playing with his own life. I’m assuming he also wouldn’t have done that if 2, 16 stone rugby players were in the car.
If he’d ended up under the wheels I doubt the police would have prosecuted the driver based on that evidence.
The reason I can think of for doing it is it’s actually Mark Cavendish practicing his sprint finishes.
Yorkshire wallet wrote:
I think he must be a relatively new cyclist too. He’s clearly not done that much before as it wouldn’t take long before he meets a motorist who is as much of a nob as he is. And crunch.
Let the nobby driver go – at least they’re ahead of you and not about to mow you down.
fenix wrote:
Ditto the above.
Whatever the driver was doing, riding like this is nothing but stupid.
If someone is driving like an idiot, then it’s so much easier (and not to mention safer) to let them get by.
Someone cycling like that shouldn’t be on the road.
Yorkshire wallet wrote:
Not sure about that. I’m confident drivers aren’t allowed to run over cyclists for riding like dicks.
Surely, in the same way the safest thing for the cyclist is to let the mental driver to get past, isn’t the safest thing for the driver to let the mental cyclist get out of the way rather than continuing to try and force past in that situation?