A study published in the British Medical Journal this week has found that female cyclists in Canada have lower hospitalisation rates than men. Researchers concluded that this may be because women tend to favour safer routes, including roads where there is better cycling infrastructure.
"Women were 50 per cent less likely to be injured to any body region and 60 per cent less likely when we were considering head injuries," study author Jessica Dennis told CBS News.
A pattern of lower injury and fatality rates for females has been observed in other transport modes, including driving and walking and the study authors point out that this is often attributed to a lower propensity for risk-taking.
"We know that women tend to ride a little more slowly, we know that women choose safer bike routes, they choose routes that have a designated bike lane, or a route that's separated from traffic," said Dennis.
She believes that much can be learnt from this. "These choices women are making, we can promote them, but we need policy makers to really buy into these separated bike routes or designated bike lanes that are going to provide cyclists the means to cycle more like a woman."
Despite this, female cyclists are more likely to sustain injury than men in some circumstances. In 2013, cycling blogger Adrian of I Cycle Liverpool discovered that in one sizeable area of Central London, 14 women, but no men, had been killed while riding bikes over the previous 12 years – all but one by a lorry or bus.
A leaked 2007 report by Transport for London's (TfL) road safety unit noted that 86 per cent of women cyclists killed in London between 1999 and 2004 collided with a lorry, versus 47 per cent of male cyclists. The report concluded: “Women may be over-represented in (collisions with goods vehicles) because they are less likely than men to disobey red lights.”
The joint study between the University of Toronto and the University of British Columbia was actually intended to examine the effect of mandatory helmet laws.
However, while researchers did not find any relationship between injury rates and helmet legislation, cycling’s modal share was one other factor that did seem to have a major impact. A major finding was that for every one per cent in the proportion of commuters who were cyclists, the risk of injuries was reduced by a third.
Add new comment
5 comments
Maybe the cyclist in the picture is EXACTLY the sort of road user that lorry drivers are looking out for?
This study is broadly in line then with the research into driving, which tends to show women drivers have fewer crashes than men.
It is noticable too with powered two wheelers. There are a lot of women riders on scooters in London these days. They are generally very cautious and often reluctant to filter (it is safe, if you know how to do it). Male scooter riders are entirely different and are as rule, far more careless. Actually, I've noticed how male scooter riders are probably the most dangerous of anyone on powered two wheelers. This isn't just the teenaged males riding with L plates on the twist and go scooters either. Older riders with full licences on larger 'super' scoots are also remarkably careless and ride far more dangerously than most motorcyclists.
Thursday mid-day I was cycling along Southwark street close to the curb with a cyclist following behind me, I heard the sound of a large vehicle approaching from behind, quickly shoulder checked and 100% EMERGENCY BRAKED to the curb, good brakes, I'm surprised the cyclists behind didn't hit me, the long flat-loader vehicle hurtling along was not leaving 5 foot or 3 foot or 1 foot or any foot gap, if I'd have continued cycling he would likely have ran me down and painted the road red with my blood and probaly the cyclist behind me too.
It's experiences like this that put people off of cycling.
https://goo.gl/maps/8AxP1SzJYkA2
In hindsight I wish I'd ignored work related deadlines, taken details from the other cyclist, chased the c*nt down, taken a snap of him and his reg and reported him to the police.
And that's why I've got a new helmet camera on order.
While this is a far too common incident on the roads, and one that none of us should have to experience, I'm not sure how this is relevant to the article?