Campaigners say cyclists could be banned from large parts of Epping Forest, following what they are calling an "anti-cycling" consultation document from the City of London about future management of the Forest.
The consultation document, which will help inform the City of London's Epping Forest management strategy for the next ten years, asks respondents whether cycling should be banned "in line with all other vehicles" or whether no cycling areas or times of day should be identified, or speed limits imposed for non-motorised vehicles.
Waltham Forest Cycling Campaign, a branch of the London Cycling Campaign, says the City needs to drop its anti-cycling stance and is calling on cyclists, making up more than 10% of visits, to make their views heard before the consultation closes on Sunday 4 October.
Waltham Forest Cyclists' website says: "The cycling section has a distinctly 'anti-bike' approach."
It says the City of London has "resisted provision being made for cycling despite 10% of forest visitors choosing to cycle", and "the consultation is mainly focussed on how to reduce and restrict cycling."
"We need to ensure Epping Forest drops their anti-bike stance and makes proper provision for cycling in order to realise the many benefits, otherwise we may well be looking at cycling being severely restricted or banned."
Although listing some benefits of cycling, the City says it can damage the landscape and create tensions with other visitors. It cites other public green spaces which restrict cycle use to a greater extent than the Forest.
Concerns raised include the dangers of mountain biking to wildlife, notably deer and horse riders, and even to the riders themselves, echoing concerns often raised in the New Forest, which has a small but very vocal group of anti-cycling campaigners.
Although cycles are allowed through much of the forest the City says it has received complaints about cyclists, notably mountain bikers, riding inconsiderately. A Forest byelaw, which carries up to a £200 fine, prohibits cycling "to the danger, injury, annoyance or inconvenience of the public".
Other questions in the consultation ask whether the City should seek further powers to manage issues resulting from cycling, and whether it should be "continuing to resist" journeys that pass through the Forest by bike but don't stop there.
The City of London calls it "the largest consultation we have ever undertaken" and says the management plan it draws up following the consultation will "conserve both the forest's character and its relevance to Londoners as a major recreational resource".
The document is split into six themes and people can choose which areas to respond to from within those criteria. The consultation ends on 4 October, and can be found here. Respondents will need to register before completing the relevant sections.
I too bought PlanetX frames and built them to my own spec. The EC130E and Holdsworth Corsa are superb frames that do exactly what they were...
That I didn't know, I assumed even a topend bike isn't worth enough for that hassle. Interesting. Still, there are definitely plenty of stolen...
Condolences to Mr Mortons family and friends....
Fallacies can be pointed out - but actually changing someone's opinion is a much more difficult task. I'll never forget the motorist who had a ...
It usually costs money for the gadgets though, unless you just use your phone and a free Strava account.
Definitely this, 100%. Judges and juries also drive, so tend to not come down on "fellow drivers" that hard. Driving isn't taken seriously in...
The EPS on the review bike is current-now-previous gen EPS v4 12v. It's replaced by the incoming wireless groupset which is not on this bike.
The bike looks, well.. mean. I'm not sure I produce enough testoterone to even look at it in the wrongway. #createmayhem
Ugh.. more strikes.. FFS not the World Champs and surely any disrutption to these world champs would affect any future bids we might have.. (for...