Sydney driver could face jail for ploughing into a group of seven cyclists

Anyone can have a lapse in concentration, its the consequence that vary from nothing to carnage.

That said, his past leads to me to think he's a crap driver who has little regard for others therefore I hope he is made an example of.

Got 18 months

http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/thomas-kerr-jailed-for-crashing-into-sydney-cy...

Fair result - eligible for parole in February 2017

Looks like was already serving a non-custodial sentence for affray at the time of the crash - add that to past record of driving while disqualified and you start to get a picture of someone who is an habitual lawbreaker and maybe doesn't perceive that this impacts others.

Pretty sure that if you read through an internet load of serious injury/fatality cyclist (and pedestrian) "accident" reports will often find that the drivers have histories of driving whilst disqualified - to cut to the point, authorities need to effectively tackle driving whilst disqualified (or unlicensed) and make drivers that have lost their licenses and had them returned subject to regular and strict renewal tests at their expense (or not return licenses at all and have plenty of random roadside checks for licenses which would probably be self funding).

"Why do people still try this on? Not seeing something is NOT a defence."

Actually, it seems to be a very valid and successful defence. The issue being that of course, it should not be, it should be an aggravating circumstance and increase penalties.

I've come to the conclusion the correct response is to section such people. If you can't explain your actions, or the explanation is so ludicrous it puts you away with the fairies, then mental illness should be inferred. In the loony bin until you can satisfactorily explain yourself. If and when that happens then we can criminally prosecute.

"Thomas Kerr, 28, who claims not to have seen the riders when he ploughed into the back of them"

This would be a get out of jail free card in any UK court. In fact the police would have just handed his keys back at the seen of the crash and sent him on his way, wouldn't have even made it to court.

Haven't they spelt his name incorrectly... I thought it was quids on to be Juan ...

And the most probable cause of inattention is...

"Momentary inattention" = "My phone notified me that someone had sent me a text" probably.

He's haunted by losing his driving licence more than by having run down this group. It's Australia after all, where cyclists rank lower than 'Roos.

Between 2008-2010 Kerr was caught speeding twice, as well as driving while disqualified and driving using a mobile phone. He also had a drink driving conviction.

To be caught so often in such a short space of time is far from normal. He clearly has no respect for the law and I'd suggest these actions must be so habitual that he considers them normal behaviour. He needs to be taken off the road before he kills somebody.

If he has no memory of the crash then he's obviously medically unfit to drive and should be banned until the cause is found.

sounds like a bullshit excuse handed to him by his lawyer. he was probably fiddling with his phone or radio

Quote:

Why do people still try this on? Not seeing something is NOT a defence.

Technically, he pleaded guilty - so he did not try that on as defense.

A salutary reminder that we are all fallible.

Unless you're blind, right? Wasn't there a case in the last few years in the UK, where someone who was classified as blind or visually impaired was driving and their passenger was telling them what was coming up on the road....

My money, without having read anything about this other than the article above, would be that he was using his phone, send him down.

Not quite sure how he is 'haunted forever by the collision', yet 'has no memory of the crash'...

Why do people still try this on? Not seeing something is NOT a defence.