Cycling campaigners in Northern Ireland have warned that people are being pushed back towards car-dependency by rail providers’ strict no bikes policy on rush hour trains. This, coupled with poor cycle parking facilities at stations, means people are “being forced to revert to car-dependency behaviours once again”, they say.
The Ards and North Down Cycle Campaign Group took their concerns to bus and rail operator Translink and the Belfast Telegraph, highlighting how cyclists cannot take bikes on rush hour trains and even after 9.30am there are only four bicycle spaces available per service.
The campaigners want the “20-year-old bike on board policy” updated to modern day “climate change action plans” and suggested the no bikes policy had been hardened this year, seeing an end to leeway that conductors would apparently previously give cyclists where suitable.
“If Translink do not update their ‘bikes on board’ policy and cannot offer secure bike parking at their train stations, this results in the public — and some of our own members — being forced to revert to car-dependency behaviours once again,” a spokesperson said.
“Our group is specifically now urging Translink to update their 20 year-old bikes on board policy and align it with the prevalent climate change action plans that have been created since the day the current policy came into being.
“The annual ‘Ride On’ Belfast event allows non-folding bikes on board up to 7.30am across NI, so applying the same condition for all working mornings of the year, when less than 50 per cent carriage loading rates are observed, would be a good start.”
The campaign group also expressed concerns about the security and standard of cycle racks outside stations. The two issues combined, they suggest, will put people off making journeys by bike and train, instead seeing a reversion to journeys by car.
Last May, Irish Rail also informed customers of a bike ban during peak hours, a policy which critics said represents “a step backwards” and “essentially eliminates the possibility of mixed-mode commuting”.
From the accounts of train travel we’ve heard from readers of this website over the years, it’s fair to say that commuters in England, Wales and Scotland also feel frustration at rail operators’ stances towards bikes on trains and the often-poor action on providing safe cycle parking facilities at stations.
Theft and vandalism are rife at station bike racks. In January, Southern Rail, Sussex Police and the British Transport Police were mocked by a sign placed outside a bike rack at Chichester’s station, it renaming the cycle parking a “bicycle redistribution point”.
Back in Northern Ireland, the Belfast Telegraph says it has seen Translink’s response to the cycling campaigners and it states that the operator is seeking to introduce access-controlled shelters at some existing facilities.
Translink also commented more generally about the bike ban concerns, a spokesperson stating: “We are an active partner with Sustrans, the Department for Infrastructure, Public Health Agency, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, and Belfast City Council in the annual Active Travel Challenge.
“This initiative encourages people to try walking, cycling and taking public transport for a more active, healthier and more sustainable way to travel. We also support the annual ‘Ride On’ day in June.
“On busy commuter trains, we prioritise space for passengers, and we can accommodate up to four bicycles on trains after 9.30am and all day on weekends, subject to availability. Our customers can use Translink’s Journey Planner app to plan their journeys with bikes. To further support our passengers in incorporating active travel into their daily commute, we offer a variety of bicycle parking facilities at our stations. These are advertised through our website.”























6 thoughts on “Bicycle ban on rush hour trains and poor bike racks at stations risk commuters being “forced to revert to car-dependency”, cycling campaigners warn”
Translink stuck in the dark
Translink stuck in the dark ages just like the rest of the country. You’re not allowed to bring a surfboard on the train to Portrush either!
They can accomodate up to
They can accomodate up to four bikes, as long as there are no parents with prams or pushchairs (not saying that they shouldnt be there, just that they will often use the same space. I can remember years ago when there used to be a guard’s van that would hold loads of bikes.
Beatnik69 wrote:
I certainly agree with that and if someone with a pram or pushchair gets on and there is no other available practical seat for them I will happily offer to move my bike and stand with it. However I have noticed recently an increase in people with prams or pushchairs occupying bike spaces when there are other areas they can use just as well where you can’t put a bike and sometimes refusing to move – even if it just means moving to the seats opposite – when politely asked and shown the sign (on Thameslink trains) which specifically says “bicycle space, please give up this space if it is needed to store a bicycle”, not even “bicycle/pushchair/wheelchair space”. That can be annoying. Recently a woman with a pushchair refused to move to a seat four feet away so I could use the bike space, loudly and aggressively saying, “I suppose you think your bike is more important than my baby?” I just managed to stop myself saying, “Well, to me, frankly, yes…”
If you *really* want to see
If you *really* want to see confusion, sit – while wearing cycling gear – in a priority seat.
Then, on receiving grief for not giving up the seat, produce a walking stick.
People just cannot comprehend that riding a bike while disabled is possible.
I am the possessor, thanks
Watching someone start by
Watching someone start by ranting at group I cycle with about how cycling isn’t suitable for the elderly and get told that at least half the group are over 70 and the e-bike belongs to the 96 year old, then about disabled not being able to cycle, while stood next to a wheelchair user in an adapted tandem…
Colleague used to have a normal bike, while also using a wheelchair.
Normal bike provided enough support at the time (now have recumbent trike) for them to comfortably ride despite being sufficiently impaired to use a wheelchair if going more than 100 m on ‘foot’…