Our live blog can sometimes be slow to load, so you may need to refresh your browser.
- News

Live blog: Trump trade war with China to cause US bike prices to soar, dinosaurs on bikes, Paris-Roubaix winner Mat Hayman to retire + more

Help us to bring you the best cycling content
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £2.49. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
15 Comments
Read more...
Read more...
Read more...
Latest Comments
@Mr Blackbird It's quite a skill.
@Terry Hutt good point, although while doing testing without a helmet I broke my shoulder and have suffered various other contusions. So I suggest the control should not be "no helmet" as in my experience that adds the confounding variable of your other limbs and appendages as (for some) instinct will mean you sacrifice them to protect your head...
@mdavidford or the highly skilled cycle football / radball players...
@No Reply dunno about childish, but I haven't heard that one since the 90s. Can't say I miss it.
Bit harsh on the BMXers.
@No Reply Er, nope - there are no age restrictions on the site. As previously noted, though, if it were restricted to adults, your choice of language would seem to mark you out as someone who shouldn't be on it.
@Mr Blackbird This is an adult forum. If adults are getting so worked up over the term bum chum, then they need to get a grip. People have a right to be offended, people have a right to offend. But if someone finds offence in something, it doesn’t mean its offensive. It means they are offended. Two different things. I am as free to offend as you are to feel offended. Freedom of speech. Do you want to silence freedom of speech? Or just silence things you don’t like?
@No Reply You obviously have a lot of knowledge of cyclo cross and make a valid point, but why detract from your comment by using a phrase that is probably offensive to the majority of readers?
@chrisonabike I think the important message here is that your head will fly 20% further if you are wearing a collapsible helmet. Has anyone researched how far your head will fly if you're not wearing a helmet at all? Seems worthy of a research grant.
Any cyclist caught cycling backwards (on a non-fixed wheel bike) should be jailed for at least 2 years and have their bike confiscated. Such a despicable manoeuvre is dangerously confusing to motorists and pedestrians.
15 thoughts on “Live blog: Trump trade war with China to cause US bike prices to soar, dinosaurs on bikes, Paris-Roubaix winner Mat Hayman to retire + more”
This year’s Red Bull Hard
This year’s Red Bull Hard Line – off the scale mental IMHO.
Regarding the mamil Tweet.
Regarding the mamil Tweet. Yes the guy was seems like a total dick (although she’s doesn’t actually explain what happened apart from she was attacked – an extremely strong word to use btw) but going onto twitter and using a word like ‘MAMIL’ – a word with very negative connotations…as she very well knows. That’s not acceptable either. I saw the thread last night and it’s not acceptable to define an entire sub group of people by one persons actions.
I’ve seen it too many times on twitter/FB and so on. It’s not right. Who cares what the guy was wearing/riding? If he’s a dick he’s a dick. 99% of the dicks on my route are wearing normal clothes and riding non racing bikes, but I dont rant and rave about ‘ALL’ ‘utility cyclists’ being bad…it’s just that my route is heavily dominated by that ‘type’ of cyclist, and most are absolutely fine as with all groups.
MAMIL #everdaysexism no?
MAMIL #everdaysexism no?
typical over reaction, just ignore him or tell him to fuck off.
Oh and as for being ‘attacked’, being told ‘you’re cheating is not being attacked!
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:
Definitely #everydaysexism though, and very much a dick!
StoopidUserName wrote:
Actually no, her version of someone saying something to do with her being a female and overtaking him is without merit and I personally think it’s made up cobblers, he saying it was cheating, yes, I can beleive that but that’s not sexism at all.
I think her story is full of holes frankly, she’s already an overeacting drama queen when she’s said she’s been attacked when she wasn’t so why should I beleive everything she’s said?
Is MAMIL really that negative
Is MAMIL really that negative? It’s pretty much a literal description of a lot of leisure cyclists… I’ve never perceived it negatively, and I’m not insulted by it. I am middle aged. I am a man. I am (when cycling) in Lycra.
vonhelmet wrote:
MAMIL is a little bit negative – it’s got some connotations of men past their prime dressing up in lycra to try and recapture their youth. However, I think what might be opbjectionable in this use of the word/acronym is the negative generalisation in the tweet “Fragile MAMIL egos”, that suggests all middle-aged male cyclists are dicks like the one in this incident.
henryb wrote:
It’s all about context. I’m happy to take the pee out of myself and fellow middle aged peeps in lycra…but in this context, it’s being used not lightheartedly but in a derogatory way (whether she meant that or not, probably didn’t even think about it).
I stopped following a lot of the mainstream cycle campaigners on twitter after a couple years as I saw too much of this sort of thing. All cyclists are equal…except some are more equal than others. There are ‘people on bikes’ (a popular term used to normalise people riding bikes) and there are scum – that’s people wearing lycra on ‘racing type’ bikes. Doesn’t matter how practical it is for a long commute, you dont fit in to the accepted norm thus can be demonised as a problem.
That’s my take, many are not like that of course, but I dont like the hypocrisy of people who moan about all the daily mail style cyclist bashing then do the same thing to a sub group themselves. It’s not something to get too worked up about, but still.
Just ride your bike and be happy! 🙂
vonhelmet wrote:
I’m technically a MAMIL too so it’s likely not negative when we say it. However it’s often used in a derogatory way and in her case it was very definitely intended to be derogatory.
vonhelmet wrote:
Yes. Nearly always connected with ‘negative’ behaviour.
Groups blocking the road
Weaving in and out of traffic
Only one speed – maximum
Not obeying the road laws
Wiggins wannabes (until they catch up with the current batch of winners).
No one else get a label for what they wear in the way cyclists do.
i know guys can be d!cks but
i know guys can be d!cks but i honestly can’t picture in my mind how that confrontation went down.
I do know that it is compulsary to lightheartedly say “ho, ho that’s cheating” or similar to an e-bike rider if you chat to them at the lights.
Or maybe i’m just thinking it through from my privileged male position and i’m part of the problem.
#everydaysenseofhumourbypass
#everydaysenseofhumourbypass ?
If I’m riding in London,
If I’m riding in London, which I often do with the dog in the basket, a lot of the issues I have with other cyclists (especially close overtakes/undertakes at speed) are with what one might term MAMILs … middle aged, male, in Lycra …
To coin another acronym, though, I do find certain McBobs to be in a world of their own and not give the proverbial about anyone else on a bike, almost inadvertently sent one into the Regent’s Canal a few months ago when he zoomed past me on my left on the towpath when there simply wasn’t space to do that (actually hit my arm as he passed me, I was riding about 3 feet from towpath edge).
‘McBobs’ … ?
Oh, Male commuting bankers on Bromptons.
Emma McInnes, if that is your
Emma McInnes, if that is your real name: you are Serena Williams and I claim my £5.
As all we have is a totally
As all we have is a totally one sided tweet, we can’t tell how tongue in cheek the ‘cheating’ comment is. Perhaps he overtook her by natural means, then she put on the after burners to overtake back then blocked him off. Who knows?