The Daily Mail has published a story claiming that drivers, cyclists and even joggers could “risk being ticketed” under a “completely wrong” Labour council speed limit, brushing over the fact that the restriction is a temporary restriction during roadworks until the end.
In yet another piece on “London’s war on drivers’ wages”, the tabloid claims the 10mph speed limit is further “proof vehicle owners are being driven off the streets”.
When checking the speed of the cars driving past with a speed gun, they note that a cyclist was recorded reaching speeds of 18mph, and a runner reaching 12mph, despite speed limits not applying to runners or cyclists.
However, it is later revealed that the speed limit, which is on St John’s Street, North London, is due to the temporary narrowing of the carriageway due to roadworks.
> 20 of the most hysterical Daily Mail anti-cycling headlines
“Islington Council have sensibly applied a temporary speed limit along a very short stretch of roadworks to ensure people’s safety,” said Simon Munk from London Cycling Campaign.
“The only part of this ludicrous non-story that has validity is the comment that the 10mph limit is ‘half-hearted’ – the more sensible option would likely have been to make this section walk, wheel and cycle only, possibly permanently.”
The plans for St John’s Street include a southbound cycle lane, rain gardens and cycle parking spaces.

Ryan, 24, told the Daily Mail: “It feels like they’ve half-pedestrianised the road. They should either fully pedestrianise it and not have cars coming down or not.
“You see people outside pubs standing in the street, on a Friday night there are loads of people standing in the street. You can’t actually walk down the pavement.
“But half-hearting, going, oh we should pedestrianise things, the 10mph limit just feels like a halfway house and it’s not helping anyone.”
The Daily Mail claims that the concerns are that the speed limit will continue indefinitely, due to the fact that the council painted it onto the road surface.
However, the council have said that the limit will only apply while the roadworks is in place. As the Daily Mail mentions, it is not unusual for speed limits of 10mph to be in place during road works.

Cab driver Noor Yaghob, 45, also told the Daily Mail: “If the reason is because of the roadworks it’s fine. If it’s not, if it carries on after I think it’s completely wrong.
“Recently because there’s a lot of work going on here and there are a lot of people moving about. It used to be a wider road and now because of the works it’s so narrow. I think it’s justified under the circumstances.
“I’m a minicab driver. So when I look at it I want to [drive] faster, but you have to follow the speed limit.”
Councillor Rowena Champion, Islington Council’s Executive Member for Environment, Air Quality and Transport, said: ‘The works at St John Street require temporary narrowing of the carriageway.
‘During this time, in order to keep local people and road users safe, we have put in place a temporary 10mph speed restriction. This restriction will be removed on completion of the works at the site.
‘We continue to work with local residents and businesses to ensure that access to all addresses and businesses is maintained throughout the works, and disruption is kept to a minimum.’

18 thoughts on ““Ludicrous non-story”: Daily Mail claims drivers, cyclists and even joggers “risk being ticketed” by 10mph speed limit… but ignore fact local restriction only temporary during roadworks (and speed limits don’t apply to runners or cyclists)”
Ludricous non-story from a
Ludricous non-story from a ludicrous non-newspaper
Quote:
Good for you Ryan, let’s fully pedestrianise it then!
From the article :
From the article :
And that is exactly why we need speed limits.
Fully Agree. Plus it should
Fully Agree. Plus it should be a condition of getting a private hire or taxi license that the vehicle has GPS speed control fitted. The tech exists so why not?
But but what about when a
But but what about when a chimney is about to fall on your car, or a terrorist / other threat appears nearby, or the police need to commandeer the vehicle to pursue a criminal. “If it saves one life” / “what would *you* do then” etc. (the incredibly rare but massively salient event argument).
You forgot driving pregnant
You forgot driving pregnant wife to hospital. Which obviously entitles the driver to put all other road users in danger.
Safety wrote:
They have to rush as otherwise the baby could be delivered and they wouldn’t have a “Baby On Board” sticker on the back of their car.
hawkinspeter wrote:
They have to rush as otherwise the baby could be delivered and they wouldn’t have a “Baby On Board” sticker on the back of their car.— Safety
“Ignorant Oaf On Board” was spotted on the back of a Golf.
chrisonabike wrote:
Woke leftie driver defies common-sense and insists “it’s my right to drive next to chimney being demolished” as fate of car flattened by a fallen chimney stack divides readers: “sorry but he had it coming to him” said allmyproblemsaredowntoboats1975 “absolutely asking for it” agreed Farage4eva26.
Regrettably there wasn’t space to print such comments as “Isn’t it a bit sad that he died?” and “couldn’t more have been to prevent this?”
I remember walking past a
I remember walking past a speed camera on a Sunday morning years ago and it went off even though there were no drivers around at the time…
I think if the Daily Mail
I think if the Daily Mail wrote that the sky is blue, I’d go outside and check.
If the Daily Mail wrote that
If the Daily Mail wrote that the sky is blue, I wouldn’t need to check because I wouldn’t have read it.
Likewise, I don’t care that
Likewise, I don’t care that they seem to think they caught a runner/jogger at 5min/mi pace.
We are talking about the
We are talking about the “Hurrah for the Blackshirts” Daily Fail here, folks
I’m sure they can’t
I’m sure they can’t permanently change a speed limit without a Traffic Regulation Order, in which case there would be an easily found document detailing the new speed limit.
The roadworks would require a Temporary Traffic Regulation Order, and there also would be an easily found document.
bensynnock wrote:
If by “easily found” you mean on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying ‘Beware of the Leopard’.
Thank you Mr. Dent, did you
Thank you Mr. Dent, did you ever get an answer to the question of who will rust first?
In all these articles I have
In all these articles I have yet to see a 10mph sign, only paint on the road.