Cambridge Cycling Campaign accuses drivers of intimidating cyclists

Finger pointed at professional drivers as county council reveals rise in number of cyclists killed or seriously injured

by Simon_MacMichael   June 11, 2012  

cambridge%20bikes.jpg

Cambridge Cycling Campaign has accused some of those who drive vehicles for a living in the city of intimidating cyclists after figures released by Cambridgeshire County Council showed a 14 per cent rise in the number of cyclists killed or injured in incidents on the county’s roads during 2011.

Cyclists accounted for nearly one in five of the 337 people killed or seriously injured in Cambridgeshire during the year, in which levels of cycling rose by 8 per cent in the county and 12 per cent in Cambridge itself, reports Cambridge News.

The total number of cyclists killed or injured during the year stood at 64, reflecting the high levels of cycling particularly in Cambridge itself, but Michael Cahn, co-ordinator of Cambridge Cycling Campaign, told the website that there were concerns about the behaviour of some drivers in the city.

“Statistically, Cambridge has a very good safety record. As we have so many bicycles on the road, there will be more collisions involving cyclists,” he explained.

“Pedestrians and cyclists are very vulnerable road users. Vehicle speed is their greatest enemy and 20mph zones will make us all safer.

“Nobody wishes to harm a cyclist, but some professional drivers in Cambridge seem to try to teach cyclists a lesson and intimidate them.”

Mr Cahn continued: “We remind all drivers that the cyclist in front of them could be their daughter or son or their own parent. Treat them with respect and look after them.

“We also want to remind cyclists not to be distracted, to follow the rules of the road and to keep their bike in good working order.”

Councillor Tony Orgee, cabinet member for transport at Cambridgeshire County Council, insisted that any incident was “one too many,” saying: “There are a number of measures we and partners have and are introducing to combat this, ranging from better training to more cycling facilities and enforcement, as well as the introduction of a cycling champion.”

That appointment of a cycling champion is in line with the manifesto of The Times newspaper’s Cities fit for Cycling campaign, with Cambridgeshire County Council appointing Martin Curtis, its cabinet member for adult services and Olympic co-ordinator, to the position in March.

According to Cambridgeshire County Council’s annual traffic monitoring report published the same month, bicycles now account for nearly a quarter of traffic in the university city, which has the highest levels of cycling anywhere in Britain.

“Cycling remains a relatively safe way of getting around and the council is committed to encouraging more people to use their bike for the health and economic benefits it brings,” added Mr Orgee.
 

7 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

“We remind all drivers that the cyclist in front of them could be their daughter or son or their own parent."

Even better, remind all drivers that all cyclists have more right to be on the road than they have and that their permission to drive can be removed if they abuse it.

posted by JohnS [198 posts]
11th June 2012 - 13:27

like this
Like (2)

By 'professional drivers' i suspect they probably mostly mean 'taxi drivers' dont they?

posted by Some Fella [619 posts]
11th June 2012 - 13:29

like this
Like (0)

If Michael Cahn is aware of drivers who use their vehicles to intimidate cyclists then he is aware of drivers committing a criminal act and he should report them to the police.

Paul W

posted by PaulVWatts [111 posts]
11th June 2012 - 14:35

like this
Like (2)

PaulVWatts wrote:
If Michael Cahn is aware of drivers who use their vehicles to intimidate cyclists then he is aware of drivers committing a criminal act and he should report them to the police.

There's a good deal of difference between being 'aware' and having evidence. Which would explain why he isn't able to report anyone to the police.

Ticktock

posted by Michael5 [121 posts]
11th June 2012 - 19:01

like this
Like (4)

A witness statement is evidence. If his comment is based only on hearsay then he is not doing cyclists a favour by making unsupported comments about other road users.

Paul W

posted by PaulVWatts [111 posts]
12th June 2012 - 10:04

like this
Like (3)

'20 is Plenty' is the future and I'm not sure why the cycling community isn't concentrating on this first and 'driver behaviour' second as the latter is conditioned by impatience and the acceptance of speed has part if life. Actually I do know why we aren't behind '20 is Plenty' It's because we're all used to 33/35/40mph in a 30mph zone. We can't have it both ways. If we want safer cycling everyone has to start doing 20mph behind the wheel. It's that simple.

MercuryOne

Silly me. You're probably right....

MercuryOne's picture

posted by MercuryOne [933 posts]
13th June 2012 - 9:15

like this
Like (3)

PaulVWatts wrote:
A witness statement is evidence. If his comment is based only on hearsay then he is not doing cyclists a favour by making unsupported comments about other road users.

In my experience of such harassment cases, including one where the driver blocked the road and got out to confront the rider, the police regard witness statements as unsupported comments, not evidence.

I now have a camera on one of my bikes so another road-rager shouldn't escape if I'm riding that one when I see them. It stinks that we need to do that.

posted by a.jumper [655 posts]
14th June 2012 - 9:25

like this
Like (3)