Home
Comments that riders should stick to stationary bikes at home or gym ignites lively debate

A doctor in Singapore has ignited a lively not to mention heated debate regarding the presence of “recreational” cyclists on doing the presence of cyclists on the island state’s roads after writing to the southeast Asian country’s leading newspaper, the Straits Times, to urge that they instead use stationary bikes in the gym.

Singapore, once one of the jewels of the British Empire, may be more than 6,500 miles from the UK, but the general gist of the letter will be familiar to cyclists everywhere; we take up too much space that would be better used by cars and should not be on the road.

That’s one of the issues debated in 29 pages of comments that the letter has so far generated on the Strait Times website, and along with last week’s events in Brazil when a driver ploughed into a critical mass ride using his car in effect as a weapon plus ongoing arguments over issues such as cycle lanes in New York City and countless UK stories we have reported shows that tension between cyclists and motorists is a global phenomenon.

In his letter, published last Tuesday, Dr Terence Teoh – it’s unclear whether he is a practising doctor of medicine – says: “The explosion in the number of adults taking up recreational cycling on public roads, who are also usually well-educated, has swayed public opinion.

“Recreational cyclists have managed to paint other road users, particularly motorists, as irresponsible, especially in according cyclists the right to use public roads.

“Yet almost every morning, scores of cyclists occupy a full lane along Upper Thomson Road and other roads.

“It takes only a single cyclist with his "reasonable" appeal for a 1.5m safe distance from a motorist to disrupt optimum usage of a public stretch for other users.

“It does not make sense to encourage recreational cycling on public roads.

“I can sympathise with the poor blue-collar worker cycling to work but not a recreational cyclist. To those who still insist on cycling, kindly use your stationary bike in your home or gym.

“It is safer and in the best interest of the public,” he concluded.

The website iPayRoadTax, which alerted us to the letter, manages to effectively punch a few holes in Dr Teoh’s argument, which seems mainly aimed against organised chain gangs of mainly expatriate workers who get together in the early morning and tend to ride more than two abreast, contrary to local law, partly for their own safety.

The Straits Times has used Dr Teoh’s letter as the starting point for a wider discussion on “What more can be done to make roads safer for both cyclists and motorists?” and whittled down the 150 suggestions received to a poll of 10 questions that garnered more than 2,000 votes.

The most popular response, gaining more than a quarter of the votes cast, was “"Designated cycling lanes. Or better yet, allow cyclists to share bus lanes that are already delineated,” while second was the cyclist-friendly “"Promote bike commuting. It is green, reduces car population and usually involves lone cyclists travelling at a slow safe speed."

However, support for some of the other proposals, such as banning cyclists at certain times or simply outright, demonstrates a strong anti-cycling sentiment held by a significant proportion of respondents.

The questions voted on, and level of response they got from the 2,205 votes cast, are, in descending order:

  • "Designated cycling lanes. Or better yet, allow cyclists to share bus lanes that are already delineated." 26.53% (585 votes)
  • "Promote bike commuting. It is green, reduces car population and usually involves lone cyclists travelling at a slow safe speed." 20.91% (461 votes)
  • "Fund and create a culture for all cyclists to develop a self-governance system, whereby all cyclists will understand the need to ride safely." 11.75% (259 votes)
  • "On roads where there are more than 2 lanes on each side, one lane should be set aside for cyclists in the early hours of the morning (maybe before 6am)." 7.44% (164 votes)
  • "Make cyclists pay road tax and create a narrow lane dedicated to cyclists." 6.44% (142 votes)
  • "Make the left-most lane 1.5m wider and add a divider where there is no bus stop. Start a COE system for bicycles to get the funds to do this." 5.8% (128 votes)
  • "Ban cycling in large groups of more than 3 cyclists as such groups hog road lanes and make it difficult for other road users. Permits should be made mandatory for group cycling." 5.03% (111 votes)
  • "Have a system of signal lights to tell all road users when cycling is not allowed, eg. during restricted hours, heavy congestion, etc." 4.67% (103 votes)
  • "A direct ban of bicycles on roads meant for motorised vehicles will solve all problems and safety issues." 4.63% (102 votes)
  • "Cyclists should be allowed on the road at stipulated times - from 1.30pm to 3pm and from 9pm to 5am." 2.77% (61 votes)
  • Other: 4.04% (89 votes)
     

Born in Scotland, Simon moved to London aged seven and now lives in the Oxfordshire Cotswolds with his miniature schnauzer, Elodie. He fell in love with cycling one Saturday morning in 1994 while living in Italy when Milan-San Remo went past his front door. A daily cycle commuter in London back before riding to work started to boom, he's been news editor at road.cc since 2009. Handily for work, he speaks French and Italian. He doesn't get to ride his Colnago as often as he'd like, and freely admits he's much more adept at cooking than fettling with bikes.

6 comments

Avatar
Justin Canham [1 post] 6 years ago
0 likes

Surely it is more logical for recreational car drivers to ride cycles at the gym. They are not getting much exercise so this would clearly more beneficial and would also stop cars cluttering up the road that should primarily be for cyclists.

Avatar
Karbon Kev [693 posts] 6 years ago
0 likes

what an idiot! good god where do these people come from for heaven's sake ....

Avatar
Charlie_ [7 posts] 6 years ago
0 likes

There are around 200 fatalities on Singapore's roads annually. Half of those are motorcycle / scooter riders, and around a quarter are pedestrians. I'd bet that none of those killed are killed by cyclists. From the point of view of overall harm reduction, a switch to cycling might be the move to make.

Avatar
OldRidgeback [2847 posts] 6 years ago
0 likes

Yet another idiot from the moron clone factory?

Avatar
Paul M [363 posts] 6 years ago
0 likes

This guy may not be a medical doctor (could be some whacky professor type instead, or just someone up his own *rse about his PhD) but all the same I never cease to be amazed by doctors' attitudes to cycling. It's like the BMA here promotes compulsory helment usage, and in Northern Ireland issued a press release in support of a private member's bill for this. Such tunnel vision - all they see is the head injuries, which account for a small minority of on-road cyclist injuries, of which only some would be mitigated by helments, possible some made worse, which are greatly outnumbered by pedestrian and indeed car-occupant head injuries, and which divert attention from the vastly greater public health benefit of encouraging exercise which cycling provides.

Avatar
Celeste08 [38 posts] 6 years ago
0 likes

My favorite is definitely the last one: "Cyclists should be allowed on the road at stipulated times - from 1.30pm to 3pm and from 9pm to 5am." 2.77% (61 votes) I think those voters have shares in the bike lighting industry...