WADA bans athletes from blood-boosting with gases xenon and argon

Gases help body produce more blood cells by stimulating levels of natural EPO

by Simon_MacMichael   September 1, 2014  

London 2012 Anti-Doping Laboratory (picture credit LOCOG)

Tags

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) has, as of today, banned athletes from using noble gases argon and xenon – even though an approved test to detect their use has yet to be formulated.

It is believed that some athletes are using the gases, mixed with oxygen, to boost the production of red blood cells through raising the production of natural erythropoietin (EPO).

fThat in turn leads to increased stamina, enhancing the performance of those participating in endurance sports such as cycling, which has been blighted by the use of artificial EPO over the past two decades.

As with the two gases that have now been added to WADA’s prohibited list, artificial EPO was banned before a test was devised for it. In an attempt at harm minimisation, the UCI ruled in 1997 that riders with a haematocrit level above 50 per cent would not be allowed to race.

A test would finally be devised in 2000. Last year, a report following an investigation into doping by the French Senate revealed that when samples from the 1998 Tour de France – the year of the Festina scandal – were retested in 2004, the samples from 18 riders were found to be positive for EPO.

Those included overall champion, the late Marco Pantani, and points classification winner Stuart O’Grady, who subsequently confessed to doping. Other riders testing positive included Mario Cipollini, Jan Ullrich and Erik Zabel.

In February this year, The Economist reported that xenon was being administered to athletes in Russia more than a decade ago as part of preparations for the 2004 Summer Olympic Games, and in 2010 the country’s State Research Institute of the Ministry of Defence published a manual setting out guidelines for its use among sportsmen and women.

It is concerns that athletes across a range of sport, not just in Russia but elsewhere, have been using xenon to gain an unfair advantage over their rivals that has prompted WADA to investigate it and now ban its use.

WADA’s science director, Dr Olivier Rabin, told Matt McGrath, environment correspondent at BBC News: "We had serious information that xenon was being used. We believe it has been used in the preparation for some major events."

He added that the agency is working towards devising a direct test for xenon, saying: "We had some preliminary pilot results that do indicate that detection is not too much of an issue but we just need to make it solid and robust in the anti-doping context and make sure that any result in the future will be accepted by a court."

However, Dr Rabin could not confirm when such a test might be validated. He said: "I cannot give you a specific date, we usually do not, what I can tell you is that the science is very solid and certainly we will do our best, now that the gases are on the prohibited lists to make sure there are detection methods available as soon as possible."

Former elite athlete Dr Ben Koh, an expert on sports medicine and anti-doping, was doubtful that a an approved test will come any time soon, and also questioned why xenon and argon should be banned but athletes could still use oxygen tents and hypoxic chambers, which he said produced a similar effect in boosting red blood cells.

He told BBC News: "Their whole argument is based on false grounds. What is happening among elite athletes is a very artificial process, involving hypoxic chambers before competitions. This is artificial, and it is no different from the artificiality of xenon."

Besides performance-enhancing benefits, WADA also said that it was banning the gases due to the health risk to athletes, but again Dr Koh disagreed with the agency’s view.

"I would argue that xenon is actually safer than hypoxic tents, in terms of heart failure, trauma to the ear and to the lungs, the risks are very well documented from hypoxic tents, on the other hand, xenon gas from the published literature seems to be quite safe," he added.

The inclusion of the gases on WADA’s prohibited list comes four months to the day before the coming into effect of the 2015 World Anti-Doping Code, which replaces the existing 2009 version.

14 user comments

Oldest firstNewest firstBest rated

bans like these are not retro-active are they?

in 6 months hopefully they'll have a procedure and whilst they couldn't ban someone from using last year, it would be interesting if they named and shamed users.....

Racer 074 for the 2014 Transcontinental Race; 2,000 miles from London to Istanbul.

http://themartincox.co.uk/2014/03/racer-074-transcontinental-race-2014/

posted by themartincox [365 posts]
1st September 2014 - 13:08

0 Likes

themartincox wrote:
bans like these are not retro-active are they?

Nope. Only applicable once its been classified as banned. Though i'm interested in how this fits in with the biological passport. If a riders red cell level spikes, then it will be picked up, so wouldn't they get the same treatment as someone who used EPO?

'It's the closest you can get to flying'
Robin Williams response when asked why he enjoyed riding so much

posted by Simmo72 [348 posts]
1st September 2014 - 13:21

1 Like

Quote:
more than a decade ago as part of preparations for the 2014 Summer Olympic Games

Did you mean 2004? There were no summer Olympics in 2014.

posted by Saratoga [19 posts]
1st September 2014 - 13:30

1 Like

International Sport - do whatever it takes (that you won't get caught for and as long as there isn't a test for).

Is winning really that important? Whatever next? Gene therapy?

posted by ronin [151 posts]
1st September 2014 - 13:32

4 Likes

Saratoga wrote:
Quote:
more than a decade ago as part of preparations for the 2014 Summer Olympic Games

Did you mean 2004? There were no summer Olympics in 2014.

All that training and breathing gases for nothing.

posted by SteppenHerring [220 posts]
1st September 2014 - 16:13

2 Likes

Saratoga wrote:
Quote:
more than a decade ago as part of preparations for the 2014 Summer Olympic Games

Did you mean 2004? There were no summer Olympics in 2014.

Good spot; that's been fixed.

John Stevenson's picture

posted by John Stevenson [1126 posts]
1st September 2014 - 17:39

0 Likes

Quote:
"I would argue that xenon is actually safer than hypoxic tents, in terms of heart failure, trauma to the ear and to the lungs, the risks are very well documented from hypoxic tents, on the other hand, xenon gas from the published literature seems to be quite safe,"

There's a strong chance that they would use tents and gas so banning one or the other does make it slightly safer for the athlete

posted by kitkat [213 posts]
1st September 2014 - 17:41

0 Likes

If they are going to start banning noble gases then surely they should ban hyperbaric chambers as well? They are performance enhancing and elitist as well (due to cost).

posted by untakenname [2 posts]
1st September 2014 - 17:46

3 Likes

At risk of dumbing this thread down... I'd be gutted if I ran a bike brand named after a susbstance that WADA went on to ban. Although, on the flip side, "Argon 18... so fast, they banned us". If their marketing team want to use that I'd be happy to receive a cheque. I'm sure someone will correct me on the naming of said lovely bike brand though.

posted by Steveal [27 posts]
1st September 2014 - 18:32

3 Likes

Ha ha, was thinking the same thing. Great strap line. Is it too late to launch my anabolic steroid brand, have I missed the boat?

'It's the closest you can get to flying'
Robin Williams response when asked why he enjoyed riding so much

posted by Simmo72 [348 posts]
1st September 2014 - 20:11

1 Like

It's very noble of them to do this (someone had to do it...)

If cycling is indeed a sport of self-abuse why aren't more cyclists sectioned under the mental health act?

posted by hairyairey [290 posts]
2nd September 2014 - 21:08

2 Likes

TBH, athletes who train at elevated levels (e.g. Kenya) get this boost 'naturally'? Are WADA going to ban Kenyans, or anyone who can afford to train there? What's the difference between using a hyperbaric tent vs. travelling to Kenya to train? And then, what's the difference in taking Ar/Xe? They're all ways to achieving the same end.

OK, so EPO injections, I can se that as bannable, as you're circumventing the body's own EPO production. But beyond that, where do you fairly draw the line?

posted by truffy [367 posts]
2nd September 2014 - 21:17

1 Like

It's the Colombians that are more of a threat with living at altitude - but their "biological passport" will show that they have a naturally high haematocrit. However over 50% your heart is pumping syrup not blood. I did hear stories of riders having to ride their bikes at 04:00 to stop themselves having a heart attack.

If cycling is indeed a sport of self-abuse why aren't more cyclists sectioned under the mental health act?

posted by hairyairey [290 posts]
2nd September 2014 - 21:59

0 Likes

If you do it, it's not bad. But you pay for it later.

posted by dogcc [113 posts]
4th September 2014 - 14:58

0 Likes