The Norco Optic C3 is an aggressively shaped short travel 29er that looks to be a solid all-rounder. Although its progressive geometry is right on the money, the bike’s overall capability and potential to inspire confidence are let down due to lackluster suspension.

The C3 is the base level bike in Norco’s Optic range and it’s a bike that’s designed to tear up the descents while being fully capable of getting you back up to the top for another go.

Norco Optic C3 | The spec

Priced at £3,000 it benefits from a carbon front triangle, and to keep the price competitive, there’s an alloy rear end. There’s full internal cable routing and handy frame protection on the chainstay and underneath the downtube. Other neat features include space for a bottle cage, and an accessory mount hidden on the underside of the top tube.

2021 norco optic c3 fork.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 fork (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

As for the spec, it’s rather interesting on this bike. A RockShox Pike Select fork delivers 140mm of travel at the front and 125mm of rear squish is damped by RockShox’s Super Deluxe Ultimate shock with a heavy hitting DH tune.

The Optic C3’s drivetrain is provided by Shimano and it’s a mish-mash of Deore, SLX, and XT, with the former providing the crank mated to a press-fit bottom bracket, SLX covering the shifter, and the 10-51t cassette and XT supplying the rear mech. Norco has wisely cherry-picked here saving money where performance isn’t 100% key and spending it where it matters.

2021 norco optic c3 crank.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 crank (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)
2021 norco optic c3 crank.jpg, by Liam Mercer

Shimano has sorted the braking too with a pair of BR-MT420 brakes. They aren’t the most sophisticated in the world but they’re mated to four-pot calipers, which summons up a good level of power. These brakes do feel very wooden, however, which can become a bit of a hazard if you’re not careful in those knee-jerk reaction moments.

As modern as the bike’s geometry is its cockpit, featuring a 780mm wide bar with a 35mm clamp diameter and there’s a 50mm stem. There’s also an X-Fusion Manic dropper with 150mm of travel. While this amount of travel is impressive to see on a medium bike, the seat tube is pretty short at 415mm. It would have been good to see an even longer dropper given the space available but I may just be asking for a little too much here.

2021 norco optic c3 seatpost.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 seatpost (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

The Optic C3 rolls on a pair of Stan’s Flow S1 29” rims laced to Shimano hubs. They get rubber from Vittoria, with a 2.4” Mazza at the front and a 2.35” Martello at the rear. The bike came out of the box with tubes, but thanks to the Stan’s rims, included valves and sealant, this was probably the quickest and easiest tubeless conversion I’ve ever performed.

Norco Optic C3 | How it rides

Thanks to the Optic’s 450mm reach, 76° effective seat tube angle and 50mm stem, it’s a surprisingly roomy, but confident place to sit. Weight feels central over the bottom bracket and when climbing, the front end is easy to weight. Pedaling is rather good too, as the rear end is pretty well behaved, sacrificing minimal travel to pedal bob. The bike’s efficiency is only enhanced thanks to those reasonably fast rolling Vittoria tyres.

2021 norco optic c3 front tyre.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 front tyre (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

However, when charging down descents, I couldn’t help but feel as if the rear suspension was underdamped. Even at the correct sag and with the rebound damping set bang in the middle of its unfortunately narrow 5-click range the bike was too excitable and skittish over quickly repeating hits. Winding the rebound damping to its slowest setting did fix this, to a point, regaining some control over its hyperactive character but it’s still a little too quick, resulting in a ride that’s a little harsher than I would like.

Midstroke support is lacking too. Through compressions and rollers the rear end bogs down in its travel, rather than offering a handful of support. Like the fork, adding volume spacers to the shock could solve this.

2021 norco optic c3 shock.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 shock (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

Something that’s also not ideal is the shock’s positioning. While the upside down shock may offer more room for a water bottle and accessories inside of the frame, it puts the adjustments in a super fiddly spot. It took some serious finger acrobatics to wind on some low-speed compression and because the bike’s cables can get in the way (they exit the front triangle and enter the rear in this area), the rebound dial can be a task to wind. If you’re a big suspension fettler, this will become a proper pain.

Moving on, there were times when I felt that the fork wasn’t quite up to the job either. It’s great for entry level bikes that aren’t expected to be ridden so aggressively but at speed the Pike Select lacked the refinement and suppleness to soak up bumps while remaining supportive. Thankfully, a pair of bottomless tokens were included with the bike and after popping one in, the fork felt much more usable but when compared to bikes of a similar price, the Pike seems to fall short which is a shame given the bike’s potential.

2021 norco optic c3 caliper.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 caliper (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

And that potential is purely down to a well sorted geometry for a bike of this type. Its slack, 65°, head angle summons up a good level of confidence at speed, when tackling tech and when pointed down something puckeringly steep (ignoring the fork’s performance). While it’s definitely not the longest medium bike on the market, the head angle regains stability, while finely balancing an agile and quick-to-corner ride.

2021 norco optic c3 head tube.jpg
2021 norco optic c3 head tube (Image Credit: Farrelly Atkinson)

Aiding performance when cornering, the low 337mm bottom bracket height makes it a hoot in the bends. It makes you feel more ‘in’ the bike, keeping weight low, and the bike planted as it’s eagerly leant.

Suspension aside, there is clearly a fun and capable bike here and while there have been a number of good spec choices, mainly within the drivetrain, the bike will come alive with some upgrades to its suspension.

Norco Optic C3 | Value

This leads me nicely onto the Optic C3’s value and to be honest, it’s up against some seriously stiff competition, mainly from well-specced alloy bikes, namely the Canyon Spectral 125 AL 6. At £2,850 it rocks a burlier Fox 36 Rhythm fork and posher Shimano SLX 4-pot brakes. The wheels arguably aren’t as nice and it comes with full SLX shifting but its geometry is a little more progressive. Its pricier CF 8 model scored very well in our review, which you can see here.

Then Vitus’s Escarpe 29 CRS will set you back £3,200. While it is a bit more expensive, this bike gets a full carbon frame, a RockShox Lyrik fork, an SLX drivetrain and those SLX 4-pot brakes. Though, admittedly, this bike is a bit of a different beast as it gets 150mm of squish at the front and 140mm at the rear, so it would be a sure stretch to call it a short travel trail ripper.

There’s also Nukeproof’s Reactor 290 Alloy at £3,000 also trumping the Norco in spec if you can forgo the carbon front end. This bike gets its suspension from Marzocchi with the excellent Bomber Z2 matched with a RockShox Super Deluxe shock. There is a bit more travel on offer though, with 150mm at the front and 130mm at the rear. Its geometry is comparable too, getting a slightly steeper head tube and a slightly slacker seat tube angle.

Norco Optic C3 | Verdict

I think that the Optic C3 would be a better bike if there were revisions to its spec. If it swapped the carbon front end for an alloy one, and perhaps downgraded the rims while upgrading at least the suspension, it would become a much more capable bike. I’m sure that upper models of this bike would perform better thanks to higher-end forks, though each bike utilizes the same shock which may be a concern.

The Norco Optic C3 is a bike that I really wanted to like. Its geometry is excellent and let’s be honest, it’s a rather pretty bike. It’s just disappointing that the suspension specced on this bike holds it back.

You might also like:

Test report 2021 Norco Optic C3 review £3,000.00

About the bike

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it’s aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own : 

It’s a short travel 29er with an aggressive geo. Ideal for those who want to cover miles but descend quickly. It does exactly that but poor suspension struggles to keep up.

State the frame material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.: 

Norco says, “The Optic C3 is an aggressive short-travel sled that rips on descents and can get back to the top without a gondola.” In this spec, suspension holds back the descending prowess but it’s efficient up a hill.

Frame & Fork

How much suspension travel does the fork have?: 

140mm

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.: 

It was comfortable when seated and climbing though there’s not enough adjustment in the suspension to get it where I like it. It’s overdamped.

How was the bike in terms of sizing and angles? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size and intent?: 

It’s almost spot on, though I would like the reach to be a touch longer.

Overall rating for frame 


How much suspension travel does the rear end have?: 

125mm

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?: 

Yes, no nasty flex.

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame: 

Looks great.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame: 

450mm reach, 65° head angle, 76° effective seat tube, 1195mm wheelbase.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame: 

Carbon front end, alloy rear.

Riding

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?: 

Yes. Fast tyres and solid pedalling platform.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive?: 

Lively

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?: 

Great in the corners but suspension struggled at speed.

Rate the bike for sprinting: 


Any comments on sprinting?: 

Efficient

Rate the bike for high speed descending 


Any comments on high speed descending?: 

Suspension holds it back

Rate the bike for technical descending: 


Any comments on technical descending?: 

Great geo but bad suspension

Rate the bike for flat cornering: 


Any comments on flat cornering?: 

low bb creates loads of confidence

Rate the bike for technical climbing: 


Any comments on technical climbing?: 

Efficient

Rate the bike for climbing efficiency: 


Rate the bike for agility: 


Any comments on agility?: 

Shortish reach and low BB help

Suspension

Rate the fork for performance: 


Any comments on fork performance?: 

It does the job but it’s not well refined.

Rate the fork for value: 


Any comments on fork value?: 

There are better forks on bikes of a similar price

Rate the rear suspension for performance: 


Any comments on rear suspension performance?: 

overdamped and harsh

Rate the rear suspension for efficiency: 


Any comments on rear suspension efficiency?: 

Little movement under pedalling

Tell us some more about the rear suspension. Anything you particularly did or didn’t like? Any features which didn’t work well: 

It’s overdamped and doesn’t have enough adjustments. It’s also orientated in the frame in a way which makes any adjustments tricky to do.

Rate the balance and performance of the suspension overall: 


Any comments on the balance and performance of the suspension overall?: 

Not the best

Drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance: 


Any comments on drivetrain performance?: 

Can’t fault the Shimano mix

Rate the drivetrain for value: 


Any comments on drivetrain value?: 

Good mix of Shimano creates solid and crisp shifting.

Wheels & tyres

Rate the wheels for performance: 


Rate the tyres for performance: 


Any comments on tyre performance?: 

Not my favourite tyres but they do the job

Rate the tyres for value: 


Controls

Rate the controls for performance: 


Any comments on controls performance?: 

great to see four pot brakes but wooden

Summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike?: 

No

Would you consider buying the bike?: 

No

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike’s performance? would you recommend any changes?: 

Suspension needs an upgrade. It would be good to sacrifice the carbon front end for better componentry elsewhere, namely brakes and suspension.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend?: 

No

Rate the bike overall for performance: 


Rate the bike overall for value: 


Use this box to explain your score: 

Great geometry but needs upgrades to the suspension to become really good. Lots of potential here. Value isn’t as good as similar competition unless you really want a carbon front end.

Bikes

All the deals displayed on our review pages are pulled from a constantly updating database feed of the best affiliate deals available. The criteria for deciding on what are the best deals is who is offering the lowest, delivered price. In most cases we will be showing the very best deal available online, but sometimes you may be able to find an item cheaper. If you can please feel free to post a link in the comments box below. To find out more about affiliate links on road.cc click here.