- This topic has 50 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 11 months ago by
Some Fella.
-
CreatorTopic
-
September 2, 2013 at 8:08 pm #19762
Shanefutcher
How is chris horner doing so well in the vuelta.the guy is a fantastic domestique and has long successful career but never been a GC contender in the grand tours.
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
Some Fella
I think we need to talk about
I think we need to talk about Pozzovivo.
😕tomisitt
Um…I suspect most of us
Um…I suspect most of us know enough to know that a DS is a Directeur Sportif. AFAIK, Horner isn’t one.Gkam84
I give up. None of you even
I give up. None of you even seem to know what Horner has won, else you wouldn’t be asking why he hasn’t won smaller tours.Also, his grand tour results, as a DS are right up there
Colin Peyresourde
Gkam84 wrote:So Horner is
Gkam84 wrote:So Horner is obviously doping in your eyes, but to me, he’s just having a good tour.Lance’s first couple of tours, yes, I would have defended him, but it became clearer as his career went on.
Where are Horner, has always been around, doing the same job as Ritchie Porte has been doing for Wiggo and Froome.
No he’s got no-one to work for, he’s having his chance and taking it with both hands.
So if Porte goes and shows like this next year when Wiggo won’t be taking on a grand tour. Does that make him an obvious doper?
In many of the big cases we don’t actually have positive tests – LAs case in particular and Balco. As I have posted above the thought is that the testing regimes are not good enough, and so many athletes pass the tests.
Besides, as we know from the Tour, they don’t test for all types of PEDs all the time. Sometimes it is blood doping, sometimes it’s for blood PEDs and sometimes just urine.
The science behind it shows that it is easier to evade a test, than be caught. Makes you realise how dumb it is to be caught.
Given that in a poll of Olympic athletes, when asked the question would you use a PED if you knew you could get away with it most answered ‘yes’. You’d be a mug not to be using them.
I am skeptical about the ‘Sky Train’, and especially Horner. Yes, a positive result helps, but until testing catches up with doping we live in a world where the benefits of cheating are great, and the chances of being caught slim.
You don’t rise from the shadows to become a GC contender over night either. You talk about shadows, but the Schleck’s never cast a great shadow over their team – physically or metaphorically. Why has Horner not dominated a small tour, or taken the mantle in the time period from 2012 Tour? Even before, when Andy was injured I can only remember him in passing.
His ability in this Vuelta really doesn’t pass the scratch test. Unfortunately for every incredible performance it raises the suspicion on the likes of Froome and co. Though I admit the Vuelta seems to bring with it less credible performances in a country which has had no drug testing scandal, but has been known as a great place for dopers to get their fixes….Even the results of the Fuentes case were burned to prevent further testing.
SideBurn
daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn
daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn wrote:daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn wrote:
Chris Horner would have also been tested, maybe not as much as Lance; but why have his negative tests not now been re-tested as positives? Because he is/was clean?erm, because they’ve not been re-tested as far as I’m aware.
I thought they were all re-tested; that is why the s**t hit the fan? Anyone know? Surely to test some but not others would be a bit fishy?
The whole thing stinks enough without selective re-testing…If you’re talking about the ‘reasoned decision’, it was a case based on witness statements.
Googling the issue suggests that some retesting has been done, Beijing Olympics for example but Chris did not ride Beijing they chose dopers instead. It is not clear how much retesting has been done.
bashthebox
There’s a statute of
There’s a statute of limitations on retests – 8 years I think? Armstrong’s samples from ’99 tested positive after the limitations were exceeded.daddyELVIS
SideBurn wrote:daddyELVIS
SideBurn wrote:daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn wrote:
Chris Horner would have also been tested, maybe not as much as Lance; but why have his negative tests not now been re-tested as positives? Because he is/was clean?erm, because they’ve not been re-tested as far as I’m aware.
I thought they were all re-tested; that is why the s**t hit the fan? Anyone know? Surely to test some but not others would be a bit fishy?
The whole thing stinks enough without selective re-testing…If you’re talking about the ‘reasoned decision’, it was a case based on witness statements.
SideBurn
daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn
daddyELVIS wrote:SideBurn wrote:
Chris Horner would have also been tested, maybe not as much as Lance; but why have his negative tests not now been re-tested as positives? Because he is/was clean?erm, because they’ve not been re-tested as far as I’m aware.
I thought they were all re-tested; that is why the s**t hit the fan? Anyone know? Surely to test some but not others would be a bit fishy?
The whole thing stinks enough without selective re-testing…daddyELVIS
SideBurn wrote:
Chris HornerSideBurn wrote:
Chris Horner would have also been tested, maybe not as much as Lance; but why have his negative tests not now been re-tested as positives? Because he is/was clean?erm, because they’ve not been re-tested as far as I’m aware.
SideBurn
Lots of people called LA out;
Lots of people called LA out; it cost them money and or their careers…
The problem was, as LA and others said, hundreds of negative tests for LA along with some discredited positives. This is hard (if wrong) evidence of clean riding. All other evidence was, as LA said verbal evidence from discredited sources.
Chris Horner would have also been tested, maybe not as much as Lance; but why have his negative tests not now been re-tested as positives? Because he is/was clean?daddyELVIS
Gkam84 wrote:
So if PorteGkam84 wrote:So if Porte goes and shows like this next year when Wiggo won’t be taking on a grand tour. Does that make him an obvious doper?
Hilarious =))
Gkam84
So Horner is obviously doping
So Horner is obviously doping in your eyes, but to me, he’s just having a good tour.Lance’s first couple of tours, yes, I would have defended him, but it became clearer as his career went on.
Where are Horner, has always been around, doing the same job as Ritchie Porte has been doing for Wiggo and Froome.
No he’s got no-one to work for, he’s having his chance and taking it with both hands.
So if Porte goes and shows like this next year when Wiggo won’t be taking on a grand tour. Does that make him an obvious doper?
daddyELVIS
Gkam84 wrote:daddyELIVS, do
Gkam84 wrote:daddyELIVS, do us all a favour….go find some proof, or stop spouting trash.Reading your comments from many threads, you see to think that every single rider is doping, you must love the sport =))
I do love the sport, but I’m not daft enough to think that the majority (including some of my favourite riders) are clean all the time. I’m certain many riders either lose weight using banned substances, train using band substances, or race using band substances, or do a combination of these, perhaps all 3. My belief is that doping in sport needs real debate because it’s a very complicated area, not as simple as doping bad, clean good. But spouting that riders are clean when they obviously are not adds nothing to the debate.
BTW, would you have said the same thing to anyone who called LA out, back in the day?
Gkam84
daddyELIVS, do us all a
daddyELIVS, do us all a favour….go find some proof, or stop spouting trash.Reading your comments from many threads, you see to think that every single rider is doping, you must love the sport =))
daddyELVIS
Gkam84 wrote:Its simple, He’s
Gkam84 wrote:Its simple, He’s finally got a chance to do something in a grand tour. He is the team leader, he doesn’t have to worry about pulling Schleck’s nappy up or making sure he’s fed and watered.He can finally able to do his own thing, I think he’s always had it in him, just been held back by others
You’re right about it being ‘simple’, but you then you ventured into fantasy land!
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.