- This topic has 101 replies, 32 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by
enrique.
-
CreatorTopic
-
June 17, 2013 at 11:50 am #19125
drheaton
Just tried to sit down and pick a Purist team for the TdF and it's hard!
Lots of high value riders, very few very cheap riders and not many bargains to be had, this is going to be a tough race to get right from a fantasy point of view.
My thinking at the minute is Froome plus 1 high value rider (Sagan/Cavendish or maybe Contador/Voeckler) then some mid and low priced riders but there's not much quality lower down, might have to rethink and go for lots of mid-range guys…
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
CarbonBreaker
OK, I’m new to the Purist
OK, I’m new to the Purist Leagues, so don’t laugh at the choices, (I just don’t have time to transfer each day at the moment).Sagan
Cav
Dan Martin
Rogers
Schleck
Noval
Le Mevel
Mederel
FischerSagan and Cav for the first couple of weeks, plus some beakaways from the French, Rogers and Martin for the TTT (Garmin), and Rogers ITT. Taking a punt on Schleck as I can see the peleton letting him go for a stage win to bring him out of the doldrums, and he is showing a little better form.
If I’m going to modify this, it’ll only be to bring in Contador, and or Talansky, at the expense of Cav, and anther rider. I can see Bertie beating Froome.
Thoughts?
chrisdstripes
stumps wrote:chrisdstripes
stumps wrote:chrisdstripes wrote:Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don’t know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho’ – might just about be worth it…It might muck your team up a bit but i’ve gone for Bennati. He is 18.6 credits and in my opinion a better sprinter than Kittel. Just a thought for you to ponder ;)
Thanks Stumps! I’d say Kittel is faster than Bennati, and will have the whole team working for him on 5-6 stages, whereas Bennati will get over the lumps better and is more likely to get to Paris, but does he still have the finishing power? And with his teammates looking after Alberto? Down to personal taste, and Bennati has done naff-all for me every time I’ve picked him, including dropping out of last year’s Giro after about 6 stages when I had him in purist. So my decision is based at least partly on spite… Possibly not the most sensible criteria on which to base my selections… 🙂
Stumps
chrisdstripes wrote:Yeah,
chrisdstripes wrote:Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don’t know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho’ – might just about be worth it…It might muck your team up a bit but i’ve gone for Bennati. He is 18.6 credits and in my opinion a better sprinter than Kittel. Just a thought for you to ponder 😉
dave atkinson
chrisdstripes wrote:Yeah,
chrisdstripes wrote:Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don’t know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho’ – might just about be worth it…kittel’s lead man for the flat stages and degenkolb first choice for the lumpier ones, according to the team. certainly the odds for the first stage suggest it’s kittel going for the win.
chrisdstripes
Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as
Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don’t know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho’ – might just about be worth it…
Stumps
chrisdstripes wrote:Happy to
chrisdstripes wrote:Happy to reveal my existing team as a) I might still change it and b) its not like its going to give anyone any ideas they hadn’t already thought of – probably only one or two unpopular picks. Panicked about having no GC guys and changed it at the last minute – trying to defend top ten in overall purist…Sagan
Froome
Talansky
Kittel
Garcia
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
El Fares
PalaciosFeel free to critique!
I started off with Sagan and Cav in my team – got neither now 😕
Kittel is a surprise he normally bottles it and packs in unless i’m thinking of someone else. Good team though, you should do well.
chrisdstripes
Happy to reveal my existing
Happy to reveal my existing team as a) I might still change it and b) its not like its going to give anyone any ideas they hadn’t already thought of – probably only one or two unpopular picks. Panicked about having no GC guys and changed it at the last minute – trying to defend top ten in overall purist…Sagan
Froome
Talansky
Kittel
Garcia
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
El Fares
PalaciosFeel free to critique!
thefatcyclist
Hello all….. The Fat One
Hello all….. The Fat One has returned for the TDF, how the devil are you all, hope you are all well, especially GKam…(i’m sorry I didn’t know, if there is anything I can do for you down here in Fife, just let me know.)Anyhoo, one purist team for the race. Picked in 3 short bursts and changed 3 times, but at least it has cyclists in it, some young, some fast, some can go up hills, and some I have never even heard of.
The new team name..
Where did all these cyclists come from?listed below.
Mark Cavendish (OPQ)
Peter Sagan (CAN)
Thomas Danielson (GRM)
Rohan Dennis (GRM)
Rein Taaramae (COF)
Christophe Le Mevel (COF)
José Ivan Gutierrez Palacios (MOV)
Matteo Bono (LAM)
Murilo Antonio Fischer (FDJ)I did have another team with Scleck, Tommy V, Hoogerland in it, but changed it. I think it might have been better,
but hey. Not enough French, breakaway guys. Bottom 1/3 of league. 😀Cheers chaps.
Stumps
Well after having my team set
Well after having my team set in stone i’ve had a rush of blood and taken out Sagan almost redoing the whole team.I now want to go somewhere where there is no internet until the race starts, i dont think the stress could get any worse. :”(
stereojet
ARGH! Porte and Pinot or
ARGH! Porte and Pinot or Froome and Dennis? :”(TERatcliffe26
6 are the same as 6 of mine
6 are the same as 6 of mine Frankiejayfrankiejay
Picked my final team. I’ll
Picked my final team. I’ll show my cards because, honestly, it’s all in fun. We’ll call this the stars, scrubs and Schleck approach. Feel free to critique:Froome
Sagan
Quintana
Dennis
Schleck
Hoogerland
El Fares
Mederel
FischerJAndrewHill
None of those. I Went for
None of those. I Went for three riders almost guaranteed more than one outright win. Plus Likely breakaways.andynic
Really hard. I’ll probably
Really hard. I’ll probably change it all again, but at the moment down to a choice between Porte, Dan Martin and Quintana (or anyone cheaper, I guess) for my purist team. Any thoughts?chrisdstripes
stumps wrote:Dr, they were
stumps wrote:Dr, they were just 2 examples rather than list the whole lot mate. I get what you mean though about sacrificing one just to get another who MIGHT do something.People have complained about the values but i think its great, we are really having to think about who to put in to get a balanced team. :D
I think its pretty good (as opposed to great), I just wish the list of sub-5 credit riders was a bit longer. I’ll shut up now before I turn into Enrique. -
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.