Suggestions for the 2013 season

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #16723
    drheaton

    It’s early, I know, but with the revival of the old suggestion thread it seems people are full of ideas on how they’d like the game to be “improved” next year!

    Obviously, this is all stuff that we’d like to see, wishful thinking really, but road.cc and Dave have always listened to what people think and have implemented good suggestions in the past (regional leagues, premium membership, the removal of the varying player values etc) so if you’ve got an idea post it below. Think of this as the place to make your request/suggestion so that Dave can see it easily. Also, tell everyone what you think works too rather than just complaining!

    Firstly off, I’d like to thank Dave for the game and strides they’ve made over the last few years to improve it into what is an excellent competition. I think that this years game is the best yet, the 4/5 split is a massive improvement over the old 1 GC, 1 AR ,1 KM, 1 PC and 5 DS split and allows for much more interesting team selections, likewise I think the constant rider values is something that should be kept next year as I haven’t missed the old system at all.

    My suggestions? Nothing major…

    1) Remove the 4/5 split altogether – I’d be happy if the current system was kept but would like to see complete flexibility, the limited budgets will restrict players from having a particularly unbalanced team and it will allow for even more creative team selections, especially where there are lots of cheap stars in a race (like this years classics). For example, pretty much all the top Vuelta teams will still have 3 of Contador, Rodriguez, Froome and Valverde so the 150 credit cap will restrict the makeup of the rest of their team. However, I guess the 4/5 split does give structure and makes the game easier to get your head around when starting out (my dad really struggled when he joined for the TdF but the 4/5 split made things easier).

    2) Expand on the premium membership with extra features such as combined purist team on the same account and stuff like that. I will probably pay for premium membership next year but I’d like to see some extra features being included for my money, not just extra races (which have been a bit shambolic this year and are very hard to follow).

    3) Teams of teams – another possible premium feature, 9 players band together into one team of players, their scores are combined in some way (straight sum of scores, average of all 9 or maybe lose the highest and lowest and sum/average what’s left) and they compete against other teams for a prize (Grand tours only maybe?). Should be fun and unpredictable, also, good for getting people to get involved on the forum.

    4) Fantasy jersey competitions – another thing to aim for when playing the grand tours, a selection of jerseys awarded to winners of particular comps:
    – a GC jersey awarded for whoever finishes 1st overall along with the bike, a black jersey possibly something road.cc themed.
    – a points jersey based on sprint stages or combined sprint points, either whichever teams gets the most intermediate sprint and flat finish line points over a race or maybe whoever scores highest just on flat stages, based on intermediate sprints would keep it interesting throughout though as you have to keep up with breaks in the mountains.
    – a mountains jersey like the points but for KoM points/mountain stages

    ideally these would be biased to make it very difficult to win them whilst still playing for overall placing, ie base it heavily on breakaway points (the KoM in particular) so that you need to pick the breaks and possibly suffer in the overall as a result, that’d make it something entirely separate to aim for like the riders aim for the KoM comp sacrificing their overall standings. Moreover, these aren’t big cost prizes and are just for fun/pride.

    5) Reduce the penalty for making additional transfers. I like the fact that there is a penalty but 20 points is very heavy, you basically need to place in the top 4 to overcome that. 10 points might bring in more tactical use of this facility and not be so penal if someone cocks up their team and needs to sort it out.

    That’s mine, just to be going on with. Also, a booby prize for whoever first mentions the ‘reset button’.

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 198 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #697989
    0
    dave atkinson

    Quote:Yeah, an excellent

    Yeah, an excellent idea. Possibly somewhere that records your final standings in each race split by season (so you can see 2011 results, 2012 resuts etc) then you can drill down into each competition and see individual stage results.

    Then a palmares section which shows good results, top 50 in stages, race overalls or anything like that.

    Then a piece of code which you can copy from the site (and is dynamic so stays up to date) that you can paste into your Road.cc signature, or a signature on other forums, and shows your best results?

    we’re not going to roll it back to 2011, i don’t think. it was a completely different engine. but forward from now we’ll try and keep everything in the game historically.

    code for your sig is a good idea…

    #697987
    0
    TERatcliffe26

    drheaton wrote:livestrongnick

    drheaton wrote:
    livestrongnick wrote:
    chrisdstripes wrote:
    Wig_Billy wrote:
    Everybody could have a ‘palmarès’ page, were any wins/podiums (stage or overall) are recorded for posterity.

    LIKE :D

    OHHH Yes i like this alot!! =D>

    Yeah, an excellent idea. Possibly somewhere that records your final standings in each race split by season (so you can see 2011 results, 2012 resuts etc) then you can drill down into each competition and see individual stage results.

    Then a palmares section which shows good results, top 50 in stages, race overalls or anything like that.

    Then a piece of code which you can copy from the site (and is dynamic so stays up to date) that you can paste into your Road.cc signature, or a signature on other forums, and shows your best results?

    I like the Palmares system idea and would probably be better than the current cumulative score system as im always focused on not dropping places as its so hard to gain places after the first few races.

    Could the cumulative system be changed and done in a similar way to the IG pro cycling index?

    #697985
    0
    TERatcliffe26

    dave_atkinson wrote:ray

    dave_atkinson wrote:
    ray silvester wrote:
    Looks like the Tour of Britain has done away with the 4/5 split :O

    yup, email going out about that.

    there’s only seven ‘star’ riders coming, we haven’t made any of the uk team riders stars as we’re developing a new system for rider values next season and we kind of need to start it now :-)

    Good call Dave, not that credits will com into play, but everyone would have had similar stars anyway. I had SS and Langeveld just as I had to have stars, but now ive put in two DS’s I wanted.

    Interesting on how your doing that then regarding the new system 😕 Does that mean its going to be very complicated, and also values may change based on there likely standing in the race?

    #697983
    0
    drheaton

    livestrongnick

    livestrongnick wrote:
    chrisdstripes wrote:
    Wig_Billy wrote:
    Everybody could have a ‘palmarès’ page, were any wins/podiums (stage or overall) are recorded for posterity.

    LIKE :D

    OHHH Yes i like this alot!! =D>

    Yeah, an excellent idea. Possibly somewhere that records your final standings in each race split by season (so you can see 2011 results, 2012 resuts etc) then you can drill down into each competition and see individual stage results.

    Then a palmares section which shows good results, top 50 in stages, race overalls or anything like that.

    Then a piece of code which you can copy from the site (and is dynamic so stays up to date) that you can paste into your Road.cc signature, or a signature on other forums, and shows your best results?

    #697981
    0
    dave atkinson

    Wig_Billy wrote:Everybody

    Wig_Billy wrote:
    Everybody could have a ‘palmarès’ page, were any wins/podiums (stage or overall) are recorded for posterity.

    good idea and one we’re already working on, and not just that either… :B

    #697979
    0
    dave atkinson

    ray silvester wrote:Looks

    ray silvester wrote:
    Looks like the Tour of Britain has done away with the 4/5 split :O

    yup, email going out about that.

    there’s only seven ‘star’ riders coming, we haven’t made any of the uk team riders stars as we’re developing a new system for rider values next season and we kind of need to start it now 🙂

    #697977
    0
    livestrongnick

    chrisdstripes wrote:Wig_Billy

    chrisdstripes wrote:
    Wig_Billy wrote:
    Everybody could have a ‘palmarès’ page, were any wins/podiums (stage or overall) are recorded for posterity.

    LIKE :D

    OHHH Yes i like this alot!! =D>

    #697975
    0
    ray silvester

    Looks like the Tour of
    Looks like the Tour of Britain has done away with the 4/5 split :O

    #697973
    0
    chrisdstripes

    Wig_Billy wrote:Everybody

    Wig_Billy wrote:
    Everybody could have a ‘palmarès’ page, were any wins/podiums (stage or overall) are recorded for posterity.

    LIKE 😀

    #697971
    0
    Stumps

    My only gripe is the value of
    My only gripe is the value of some riders which appear to be quite high for their actual standing in the sport.

    Other than that it all seems to work very well.

    #697969
    0
    captain_slog

    You could borrow from fantasy
    You could borrow from fantasy football and give riders a point or two just for riding in a stage. Or a point for starting and a point for finishing.

    #697967
    0
    STEVESPRO 79

    Trust Dave and the team to
    Trust Dave and the team to make the usual PRE-season tweeks as required….Not so sure about a league of leagues….Would that stop people from gambling on stage wins in order to play a little safe at times….Just a thought… 😕

    #697965
    0
    memories of meseeuw

    Something like that sounds
    Something like that sounds good. I suppose it would then even out that way regardless of the size of the competing leagues? I’ve no idea what the average league size is? Just trying to work out if a league of 50 players would have an advantage over a league of 10 players for instance, or if it would work the other way round? I think it would probably be an even playing field if you took averages, but my maths isn’t that great to know for sure.

    #697963
    0
    dave atkinson

    Raleigh wrote:
    Did we ever

    Raleigh wrote:

    Did we ever sort out that thing where people were picking unlisted riders to save credits for more expensive ones?

    next year the rider values will work on a different basis and a rider’s value will change between competitions, rather than being set at the start of the year. also, there’ll be a more consistent base value for DSs

    #697961
    0
    dave atkinson

    how about a ‘league of
    how about a ‘league of leagues’ where your average league score counts?

Viewing 15 replies - 166 through 180 (of 198 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.