- This topic has 25 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by
paulfg42.
-
CreatorTopic
-
July 23, 2012 at 7:48 pm #16410
Tom H
So what did people think of it? I didn’t have too much expectations and the low budget was pretty obvious but I’ll keep watching it. The background noise was terrible though, and the dialogue between very American Gary fisher and very Scottish Graeme Obree made me laugh. So did anyone watch it?
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
paulfg42
Thought the 2nd was pretty
Thought the 2nd was pretty good, although a bit of a background piece on Eddy would have been good. Hopefully they will be able to include that sort of thing when they move to an hour for the show.
BigBear63
Just reading thru some of the
Just reading thru some of the comments had me laughing my man breasts off.The show was pretty dire but it has promise.
Needs to be more selective about who they interview on the couch. Obree & Mansell? Didn’t work. One is a mad a march hare and the other is terminally dull. The Wilf Lunn lookie-likie, mentioned by a few commenter’s, (for those under 40 that’s the nutty professor guy off the BBC kids show for the deaf ‘Vision On’), whom I understand invented the mountain bike. No not Wilf Lunn…the lookie-likie. Oh forget it. He was rubbish anyway. No not Wilf the Yank was rubbish.
Show 2 was much better and so I remain hopeful.
russyparkin
but other wise pleased as
but other wise pleased as even if it is a bit wet, it will evolve and improve im surerussyparkin
i think it needs to be longer
i think it needs to be longer and have a few bike features or race / rider history. maybe do a feature on some greats like steve peat, jason mccroy, faustino coppi, wiggins etc. maybe like gadget show of old, have informed people testing helmets or wheels etc. utilise the formatBhachgen
Just watched it on the
Just watched it on the itvplayer. Really badly edited version on that, with the ads in the middle of a sentence and the show cutting off early at the end.Definitely much better than last week, especially wrt the sound. If it is going up to 1 hour later in the run then that sounds like a positive – as long as it doesn’t result in lots of padding which would be almost as bad as the current rushed nature of it.
There was clearly a lot of unused material so they might like to consider putting “full-length” versions of some of the reports or interviews online. For example the report on the megavalanche was entertaining enough but I wasn’t bothered about seeing much more, while I might click into the full length version of the Merckx interview. Others might feel the exact opposite.
OldRidgeback
The bit on bike sizing was
The bit on bike sizing was reasonable as was the downhill MTB race item. But trying to suggest Gary Kemp is uber-trendy is a bit of a stretch of the imagination. He was – 30 years ago. The interview with Eddie Mercx came across as really amateurish. I think the presenters are part of the problem.Sadly Biggins
The second episode did seem
The second episode did seem to be an improvement on the first, but that’s not difficult. I still can’t see how they can deal with the breadth of cycling disciplines they are purporting to cover in only 30 minutes in anything other than a superficial way, although I read somewhere that it is going to be 60 mins long from episode 4. If true, it might develop into something good.Super Domestique
Seems they listened
Seems they listened (imho).Less background noise. Intro’s to the people on the show with either pics or captions.
Smoother transitions from one peice to another.
Yes, a work in progress and who’d not love to see an hour long show but as I said before, just happy to see bikes on tv.
paulfg42
I thought the features were
I thought the features were ok but the links, and the chat on the couch, were a bit cringe-inducing. Obree was under-used – his comment after the Box Hill feature was quite illuminating, and the show could have done with more of that. Not a bad start for a show trying to cater for all cyclists though.And Nigel Mansell is a dick.
colinth
It wasn’t great but just
It wasn’t great but just pleased that there’s actually a cycling show on ! Hopefully it’ll improve, probably needs to be an hour if they’re going to do the sofa chat stuff as well. I like Fisher, Obree and Mansell, but the three of them together was toe curlingChrisleeks
I was tremendously excited to
I was tremendously excited to hear of this new programme and its trailing throughout the tour de France only served to heighten this excitement. I spoke to many during the Tour who were really starting to get into the event and seemed to spend much of it explaining how things worked and what was happening for this army of new fans to this great sport. So it was difficult to imagine a better time to launch this new series. So how did it go?The biggest problem for me was the length. I see countless programmes that are stretched out painfully over one hour where as you enter a commercial break you have a lengthy foretaste of what is to come followed by an equally lengthy reprise after the ad break. This programme would easily have filled an hour and perhaps allowed a little time to educate some newer and younger fans. Graeme Obree’s heroic exploits were in the mid 90s and could have been explained with a brief vt biography. The same is also true of Gary Fischer. These two visionaries, notwithstanding their eccentricities, seemed to be struggling to get a word in over the hubbub behind and presumably some producer pointing to his wrist as they attempted to cram everything in.
Cycling is enjoying its greatest growth for decades on the back of olympic and tour success and people just getting out on to the road. Could ITV not release another half hour for this show? Having seen some of the other offerings on ITV4 I would venture yes.
A long overdue effort but let’s seize the opportunity and make this the must see offering it could be
Raleigh
Crosshouses wrote:
ACrosshouses wrote:A complete turn-off for non cyclists, like my wife.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Kapelmuur
Dull, disappointing and
Dull, disappointing and amateurish. Was there anything in it that a cyclist wouldn’t already know?A complete turn-off for non cyclists, like my wife. It just confirmed her opinion of cyclists as boring obsessives 🙁
Raleigh
andylul wrote:The Box Hill
andylul wrote:The Box Hill feature was pretty annoying as they mentioned cyclists of [cough] mixed abilities (Wouter Sybrandy?) but didn’t even introduce them by name.If people only knew how SICK Wouter Sybrandy was…
I mean this seriously though, he’s actually quite good
andylul
The Brad Wiggins prog is
The Brad Wiggins prog is still on ITV Player for another three weeks (although there are some technical issues at the moment)If that link doesn’t work, try going to ITV Player direct or youtube
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.