What did you think of “The Cycle Show”?

  • This topic has 25 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 14 years ago by paulfg42.
  • Creator
    Topic
  • #16410
    Tom H

    So what did people think of it? I didn’t have too much expectations and the low budget was pretty obvious but I’ll keep watching it. The background noise was terrible though, and the dialogue between very American Gary fisher and very Scottish Graeme Obree made me laugh. So did anyone watch it?

Viewing 10 replies - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #693417
    0
    trikeman

    Hi All,
    I thought it was a

    Hi All,
    I thought it was a little ‘magoo’ however, for a first stab at least it was cycling on TV…. I think that once the market researchers study the forums they will be able to make it more focused on what is really wanted – an attempt that gets my support. 😀

    Anyway, did anyone see the programme just before it? I thought that was a positive slot and in some cases a really frank account of Wiggo’s rise. I think he has done great considering the presssures that were highlighted in the programme. If you missed it then it’s well worth searching for.

    Regards,

    Trikeman. 😉

    #693415
    0
    andylul

    Gary Fisher?
    I thought that

    Gary Fisher?

    I thought that was Wilf from Vision On

    Watched half of it last night – don’t understand why they’ve gone for allowing that much ambient noise. The Box Hill feature was pretty annoying as they mentioned cyclists of [cough] mixed abilities (Wouter Sybrandy?) but didn’t even introduce them by name.

    Frustrated that there wasn’t any time or inclination to explain what Graham Obree was doing with his land speed attempt, showed nothing of the mechanics of his bike (other than wobbly head shot) Wilf from Vision On obvioulsy didn’t give a shit who he was and knew nothing about him. It perpetuated the myth that Obree is an eccentric pottering oaf who has no knowledge of engineering.

    Probably won’t be upset if I miss the next seven and a half episodes…

    #693413
    0
    vsmith1

    I didn’t have great
    I didn’t have great expectations, and wasn’t disappointed in that respect – which isn’t saying much. I mean a 30 min ute slot with the usual ads means that the actual content once the start, end have got involved means that the it is about 20 minutes.

    It felt rushed – clearly the content needs to link up for more references – like I’d never heard of Mansell’s stuff before and it wasn’t that well explained. Every item was just a taster – I mean the cycle checks – I’d be expecting the checks to include not just brakes and tyres but also handlebars, wheels firmly fixed, etc. The ride around Box Hill was OK. I would have a closer view of Obree’s bike. As already said, no real introduction for people – especially Gary Fisher. Most people wouldn’t know him from Adam.

    They’;ve just got to settle into it, and please don’t try to do too much variety in each 20 minute programme. Less spread more depth – get the spread across the whole series.

    #693411
    0
    didds

    Me and Mrs Didds were fairly
    Me and Mrs Didds were fairly underwhelmed too. I did think that when they advertised the show as “all cycling for all cyclists” etc that whilst it was a laudable attempt to not just have a roadie show for roadies, or a all-britches-and-camelbaks for MTBers etc, that they may end up spreading themselves very thinly as a result, but fair goes on them for trying. They are also in the difficult position of being all things to all men… which to a degree the TdF commentary has to be too… it has to encompass those new top cycling without any ideas, those that have been doing it their entire lives (possibly still without any ideas!)… then to cover commuting areas but also keep the track heads happy.

    As for last night, I thought it was pretty cheesy, fairly hokey. Coming from a cycling cafe was an attempt to keep it matey and a connection with the activity, but there were clear sound problems for whoever was stuck on the right hand end of the seating (from a viewers’ perspective). Top marks for the commuting but.. but the advice was useless. “Keep away from trucks”. Very helpful I am sure when cycling in a busy city. It did get mentioned in passing, but a better _emphasis_ might have been “don’t get up the inside of trucks and stay in a primary position in heavy traffic”. I appreciate they don;t want to post negative impressions, and that is laudable too, but the safe cycling piece was fairly unhelpful (with Bikeability instructor’s hat on there

    Oh – and Gary Fisher was a nightmare. I thought Obree was gonna chin him at one stage when Fisher prodded him for about the 5th time!

    didds

    #693409
    0
    Raleigh

    Just watched it and it was
    Just watched it and it was pretty rubbish.

    Mansell was stupid, bad at acting and had little intelligent input.

    Fisher was crazy, and took the whole of cycling into the realm of disrepute.

    Obree was classy, but his project was washed over, along with his achievements.

    Why can’t there be a proper cycling show for people who already cycle, that just seemed to be jumping on Wiggo’s success and the populisation of cycling in general.

    They need to take it more seriously.

    I can’t help but think that road.cc could’ve made a much better program, with product reviews, rides, sportive footage, racing, fitness advice and something funny.

    Shall we try and make a half hour film?

    My voice sounds rubbish on camera, but I;ll take some cool videos!

    #693407
    0
    Paul J

    Too much ad-hocish waffling
    Too much ad-hocish waffling on the couch. Doesn’t work when the show is so short! Also, some non-TV people aren’t good at the short & sweet sound-bites that are needed for that format.

    Obree, for one, would have been better served up in a separate report, with a structured and edited interview. They could have given a proper introduction too! A lot of people won’t know have known who Obree is and what he’s done.

    Ditto for Fisher – he at least got a brief introduction as the father of mountain biking (I didn’t know that).

    Finally, the patronising helmet promotion was annoying. Some of their reportage at least showed some normal cyclists, going around in normal clothes. However, anyone working for the show appears to be required to toe the “Cycling: Danger! Fear!” line when it comes to their apparel – which I think is terribly damaging. Even the sequence with the guy in the business clothes on the fold-up in the city has a helmet. Then they had Mansell deliver a, presumably pre-arranged, little sermon about wearing helmets.

    Overall: Good to see a general cycling programme on TV! Good first effort, though some tweaks still need to be made (and no doubt will be).

    #693405
    0
    Tom H

    Yeah I think they need to
    Yeah I think they need to settle into their niche a bit more, but I could see it getting better. I think people should watch it just so that it has the views and will improve. I think it would be good if they managed to get some celebrities who aren’t particularly cyclist cyclists on there, Davina comes to mind even if she’s not my cup of tea.

    #693403
    0
    palefish360

    I never thought I would see a
    I never thought I would see a Cycling Magazine programme on mainstream TV. It has rough edges, but it is here, and could help to encourage more people out on their bikes, which can only be a good thing, cant it?

    #693401
    0
    Super Domestique

    Watched and tbh just pleased
    Watched and tbh just pleased to see cycling on tv. If it makes people give it a go then, to me, that’s a good thing. You won’t please everyone obviously so here I am, my feet are up and sitting back waiting for everyone on the couple of cycling forums I use to rip it apart, etc.

    Oh well, popcorn anyone?

    #693399
    0
    Gkam84

    I set it to record, but ITV
    I set it to record, but ITV and Cycling do not go together, so I know what I expect 😉

Viewing 10 replies - 16 through 25 (of 25 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.