- This topic has 33 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
joachimvadseth.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 22, 2019 at 2:43 pm #30297
joachimvadseth
Hey guys! Haveing trouble deciding my next investment..
looking at the Canyon Aeroad CF SL 8.0 with Ultegra R8000 with direct mount calipers OR the 7.0 with 105 and didc brakes.. they are both in silver, witch I really want. But disc or no disc? If I go Ultegra disc its only availsble in black 🙁
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
IanEdward
Quote:
I regret getting the gravel bike (last March) with discs though right now I’m not sure if you can get a gravel frame for rim brakes or v-brakes /drop barsThere’s very few left on the market although I’m speccing a ‘dream’ gravel/CX build using a Kinesis CX1 frame, available on sale at the moment for £280 in some places (frame only, a suitable carbon fork is £175).
I’ve now got it down to £1850 for a CX/gravel bike which would weigh only 8.1kg in race mode (single chainring, lightweight tyres) and 8.6kg in gravel mode with a 2x 48/32 chainset and fatter gravel tyres. That’s using Avid Shorty Ultimate cantilever brakes which I still see people racing CX on so they must be OK. The alternative would be TRP mini-Vs which are also good (I have them on my commuter) but less mud clearance. At least they are quiet in the wet though using Swisstop pads.
You’d have to spend twice that money to get a disc brake gravel bike that light, and you’d still have scrapey squeely discs in the wet!
joachimvadseth
I live in Norway guys, no
I live in Norway guys, no riding outside for the next 4-5 months for me anyways. Been on Trainerroad/KICKR Core the last seasons.
I think I could go with 105 and calipers, as the performance is almost identical. My old 6800 groupset is probably less of a performer than the R7000 maybe anyway. But still; non-carbon shifters? Naa.. it must be Ultegra. I cant cheap out on 105. I think Ive decided for the CF SL 8.0 Ultegra with rim brakes. I got a couple of wheelsets to use in the wets anyway.
My current bikes are 53 and 52cm. Canyon says I should go for a XS frame since Im about 172cm. My girlfriends brand new Endurance CF 7.0 with 105 disc is a XS and it feels ok. Even tho Canyon says its no difference between mens and womens bike sizes.
Also, the Aeroad CF SL 8.0 is not avsilable in silver in S, only XS.
I could wait for the new model, but how much better could it be? And do I need it? Definetly no. So a 2019 bike is good enough for me. Question is if the will have a sale and The bike is still in stock at that point.TheBillder
Given that you are selling
Given that you are selling the Zoncolan and this is the “next” best bike, is resale value a consideration? The way marketing is going, will rim braking be seen in 5 years time as
a) as nasty as gear cables coming out of the side of the hoods
b) a sadly missed aesthetic and functional high point
I suppose the other point is that 105 vs Ultegra is a head vs heart debate. This is a specal bike, so will 105 move you in the same way as Ultegra? What will get you out riding and feeling that this is so nice? Hydraulic discs feel great to me on the few rides I’ve been able to try them, but for me, 105 is special level, Tiagra entirely adequate.
My summer bike has rim brakes (on Al rims) and poor wet weather braking but I haven’t yet fitted better pads. On other bikes I have had rims written off which I hate. I’m amazed how gungy things get on a medium length wet ride and the water channels in the pads are tailor-made for girt collection. I’m not enough of a cleaner stop mid-ride…
My winter bike has cable discs which I do prefer in the wet despite the howling – the braking is so much more confidence-inspiring. I am a slightly timid descender and unlikely to brake really hard often, but it still feels far better – especially with newish pads. Have sometimes heard the grit scraping sound in very wet conditions but stopping and spinning the wheels never seems to show any frictional effect.
Dingaling
I have posted previously
I have posted previously about how poor my SRAM Red disc brakes are. In the dry they are not as good as my Campag Super Record rim brakes. In the wet they are horrible. As a hobby cyclist just riding to keep reasonably fit, I don’t have to go out in the rain. When I did get rained on, towards the end of a ride, I couldn’t believe the squealing noises that the discs made. Even when I wasn’t braking I could hear scraping from grit getting between the disc and pads.
I regret getting the gravel bike (last March) with discs though right now I’m not sure if you can get a gravel frame for rim brakes or v-brakes /drop bars.
Conclusion:unless you have a compelling reason to go for discs, go with rim brakes.
ibr17xvii
If it’s for your best summer
If it’s for your best summer bike unless you live at the top of a mountain then I’d go rim brakes.
Winter bike = disc brakes all day long.
Yes they might be a bit more of a faff every now & then to maintain but there’s plenty of help & info out there if you’re struggling (as I have been on a few occasions being new to discs).
I have the AL 7.0 Disc as my winter bike & it’s been excellent.
EddyBerckx
The disc vs no disc argument
The disc vs no disc argument has another 5 years I reckon.That’s beside the point.
There is strong belief Canyon are releasing a new, updated version of the aeroad early next year. It was / is a hell of a good bike currently…personally I’d wait to see just how good the new one will be…especially as you won’t want to ride your rim brake version in wintery bad weather 😉
Mungecrundle
Aesthetically, functionally,
Aesthetically, functionally, extra tyre clearance and for the sake of those lovely carbon wheels.No brainer has to be disc.
Maintenance also very simple.
joachimvadseth
I wash my bikes after EVERY
I wash my bikes after EVERY wet ride or once a week i general. Not living in hilly area så I dont need discs.
Anonymous
Drinfinity wrote:105 hydraulic discs.Do you really want to go down a hill and use rubber blocks to grind road grit into those nice carbon rims as a way to stop?
What grit do you get sticking to your braking surface, is that because you couldn’t be bothered to check your pads andd give your rims a quick wipe every so often? The ‘paste’ that people refer to is usually found on a commute bike that has had next to no attention to cleaning whatsoever, the amount of ‘grinding’ gunk on your best bike rims is minimal even in poor conditions because it’s very rare that riders will be riding in such conditions so often and then not bother cleaning afterwards.
And if you have to keep braking a lot going down hills then either you’re an absolute newbie riding well outside their skill level or you’re someone who isn’t interested in improving their ability to judge descents/corners and continually choosing terrain they know they cannot handle that well on the downhill sections so are always on the brakes.
Limit of braking is tyre grip and your skill level in judging when to brake and not pushing the boundaries, that applies even more so in the wet, ever wonder why those on discs have just as many incidents as those on calipers? Later braking with discs because you think you can grab a handful without worrying about modulation means you have less thinking time and more likely to put the tyre beyond its traction capability because of the higher speed into corners before braking late, this means more skids and more crashes especially riders who are a bit shonky, we see this occur in the pro ranks often because they are pushing, it’s not the lack of braking it’s the poor judgement and lack of talent.
joachimvadseth
Yeye! One day I will ride
Yeye! One day I will ride with the sound of a slightly bendt disc! But it looks good tho! Ultegra disc is not an option, as its only avsilable in black and not silver 🙁
it will be my next ‘best bike’ as Im planning to sell my Zoncolan 6870.
IanEdward
If it’s your ‘best’ bike then
If it’s your ‘best’ bike then I would go rim brakes and Ultegra, lighter, quieter and personally the benefits of discs for me are only for really rough, long descents when your arms might get fatigued, or if you’re doing significant mileage in the wet when your rims might get worn down (or maybe carbon rims, I’ve never used them and am unlikely to ever afford them!)
I would hate to spend good money on a high end bike and then have to put up with squealing disc brakes in the wet, or rubbing pads when you’re time trialling along the road and trying to just focus on keeping the gear turning! I’ve had both happen on my gravel bike with disc brakes and now it gets left in the shed unless I really need to take it out.
hobbeldehoy
It’s calipers for me. Road
It’s calipers for me. Road cyclists have been have been seeking lighter wheels for decades but discs put the weight back on the wheels. Yes discs give confidence on long and fast descents but cyclists have been doing it for decades with calipers. Learn to feather your brakes and use your body as an air brake. I think discs are being pushed for marketing reasons.
joachimvadseth
Yea ease of maitenance is a
Yea ease of maitenance is a pluss with calipers. I have pair of chinese carbon clinchers so theReynolds could be saved for special ocations.
discs looks good tho, but the 105 crankset has a lot of creaks snd cranys for dirt to collect, wich Im not a fan of. Also the 105 hydraulic hoods look ridicioulusly large compared to the mechanical shifters.
Drinfinity
105 hydraulic discs.
105 hydraulic discs.
Do you really want to go down a hill and use rubber blocks to grind road grit into those nice carbon rims as a way to stop?
aerobean
If you live in a hilly area
If you live in a hilly area get discs, if not get rim brakes -
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.