- This topic has 33 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 6 months ago by
joachimvadseth.
-
CreatorTopic
-
November 22, 2019 at 2:43 pm #30297
joachimvadseth
Hey guys! Haveing trouble deciding my next investment..
looking at the Canyon Aeroad CF SL 8.0 with Ultegra R8000 with direct mount calipers OR the 7.0 with 105 and didc brakes.. they are both in silver, witch I really want. But disc or no disc? If I go Ultegra disc its only availsble in black 🙁
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
joachimvadseth
Ive ridden down this climb
Ive ridden down this climb (10-15km one way and 30-40km the other way) with my chinese carbon clinchers with Swisstop pads both in the wet and dry (wet was ofc a bit mor scary) but it was no problem. A bit of heat and smelly pads is to be expected.
So I think Ill go with rim brakes as the wheels are cheaper and I can use my other wheelsets. Alså easier maitenance and no rubbing rotors. So the Aroad CF SL 8.0 in silver it will be. I see the delivery date for a small size frame is feb 2020 (Ill be getting the SX I think anyway), so the question is if they will release the new Aroad after that or if that will be the new Aeroad. However the improvments or changes, they might be marginal based on the pictures we all can see on google.
The only thing holding me back is the chance of a end of season sale. But I want my bike NOW so mebe I just have to swallow that one. How much money can I save, I dont really care. Is it 100, 200 dollars, or 500 or 1000 dollars? Yes I will only be using it on the KICKR for months and not ride it outside for a very long time, but that also dosent matter!
I need a new powermeter as well, since the Stages I have today is a 172,5mm, the XS/S framsizes uses a 170mm crank, or mebe just buy a new crank, thats cheaper tho. Or sell my current bike with the powermeter.. well see.
mtbtomo
There can be a difference
There can be a difference between disc and rim but I would never change my route if the weather changed for the worse regardless of being in the mountains or not.
Indeed I have ridden in the Alps and Pyrenees in the rain on rim brakes and not worried at all.May be it depends on the specific rims and pads but on the bikes I have, I can lock my wheels whether rim brakes bike or disc brakes bike in the wet or dry.
wycombewheeler
joachimvadseth wrote:I live in Norway guys, no riding outside for the next 4-5 months for me anyways. Been on Trainerroad/KICKR Core the last seasons.
I think I could go with 105 and calipers, as the performance is almost identical. My old 6800 groupset is probably less of a performer than the R7000 maybe anyway. But still; non-carbon shifters? Naa.. it must be Ultegra. I cant cheap out on 105. I think Ive decided for the CF SL 8.0 Ultegra with rim brakes. I got a couple of wheelsets to use in the wets anyway.
My current bikes are 53 and 52cm. Canyon says I should go for a XS frame since Im about 172cm. My girlfriends brand new Endurance CF 7.0 with 105 disc is a XS and it feels ok. Even tho Canyon says its no difference between mens and womens bike sizes.
Also, the Aeroad CF SL 8.0 is not avsilable in silver in S, only XS.
I could wait for the new model, but how much better could it be? And do I need it? Definetly no. So a 2019 bike is good enough for me. Question is if the will have a sale and The bike is still in stock at that point.I’m 175cm, and my orthers bikes are 54cm, I have Aeroad in S, it is more cramped, but as it’s supposed to be an aggresive position thats to be expected. If you don’t want an agressive dropped riding position, then might as well go for an ultimate instead.
wycombewheeler
CyclingInBeastMode wrote:……also ignore that braking power is totally irrelevant to stopping ability when the limiting factor is tyre grip?not even close to being true, friction between blocks and carbon rims is no where close to friction between tyre and roiad, even in the wet.
on the occasion when I got caught in rain that hadn’t been forecast, I was well aware of a reduction in braking and consequently chose a route home without any steep descents, meanwhile when riding on my disc braked winter bike, I can descend almost as normal.
Anyone stating there is no difference either hasn’t used disc brakes or doesn’t ride where there are hills
wycombewheeler
CyclingInBeastMode wrote:deffo go no disc, there’s absolutely zero need to go disc in any weather conditions and calipers are ridiculously easy to maintain and replace pads. If you’re one to ride in constant wet/mud for 10,000+ miles a year, live in a hilly area and use carbon rims then discs might be a consideration based on cost of wearing themout, otherwise you absolutely don’t need them.Aethetically it’s a no brainer to go caliper brake.
I have a canyon aeroad, and this is not true, braking in the dry is fantastic, braking in the wet is minimal, to the point where it’s hard to lose any speed going down anything over 10%. Ignore all these traditionalists telling you disc brakes are not better than rim brakes.
However, unless the aeroad is going to be your only bike, there is no need to take it out in the wet, keep it for best and enjoy it in the sunshine, keep it clean, and rim brakes are fine.
Also aeroad comes with very nice expensive wheels, riding in the wet is a sure way to need to replace these sooner than neccesary as the brake blockes collect grit.
Mathemagician
Welsh boy wrote:You have to wonder why Campag stuff is being sold off so cheaply though don’t you.Because their 12-speed stuff is out and so the H11 stuff is now last generation and will be discounted. It’s not rocket science.
Mungecrundle
CyclingInBeastMode wrote:
CyclingInBeastMode wrote:Mungecrundle wrote:Aesthetically, functionally, extra tyre clearance and for the sake of those lovely carbon wheels. No brainer has to be disc. Maintenance also very simple.How much tyre clearance do you need, a short drop 49mm caliper accepts a 28mm tyre on a race frame (that’s not the newer Shimano 8000/9100 that are 51mm), with better design that could be increased. We know for a fact that calipers such as the 57mm TRP957s are as good as Campagnolo Skeleton brakes, well according to Stu Kearton on this site in his review of such so increasing the tyre clearance on a racing frame designed for caliper brakes is in fact easy to do, 31mm with a mudguard I’ve done and without 35mm.
That’s before you even get to Vs/Mini-Vs, are there any road based disc framesets that can take 700C 42mm tyres with a mudguard or 50-55mm without, there have been in the not so distant past road based framesets including full carbon that have been able to accept very wide tyres with rim brakes, I know because I have a selection, off the peg from one of the big manufacturers so it has been entirely possible.
Aethetically and functionally a no brainer, explain? The former I understand is subjective, cleaner lines of a caliper braked bike to me look far better, functional, in terms of more weight and less aero for discs as well as being more expensive compared to similar spec bike how is a disc braked bike better functional/wear wise on carbon rims except for the very extreme scenario I gave above?
Are you going to argue that outright braking power is functionally better – ignoring the risk compensation aspect of that, also ignore that braking power is totally irrelevant to stopping ability when the limiting factor is tyre grip?
I’m not going to argue with you at all. It’s a completely pointless exercise in futility. Your mind is made up. In your previous incarnations I cannot recall you ever having made any claim of actually trying disc brakes but nevertheless your mind is closed.
Personally I currently have bicycles with both types and the one with rim brakes is a Dura Ace setup. My actual, real experience over many years and thousands of miles is that disc brakes are functionally superior. Aesthetically I think they look modern and suit the more organic lines of carbon frame bikes. For skinny steel classic rim brakes look better. My opinion.
Rim brakes are perfectly adequate, but I’ll be enjoying the descents with one finger braking and the superior control of disc brakes thankyou very much.
Anonymous
Mungecrundle wrote:
Mungecrundle wrote:Aesthetically, functionally, extra tyre clearance and for the sake of those lovely carbon wheels. No brainer has to be disc. Maintenance also very simple.How much tyre clearance do you need, a short drop 49mm caliper accepts a 28mm tyre on a race frame (that’s not the newer Shimano 8000/9100 that are 51mm), with better design that could be increased. We know for a fact that calipers such as the 57mm TRP957s are as good as Campagnolo Skeleton brakes, well according to Stu Kearton on this site in his review of such so increasing the tyre clearance on a racing frame designed for caliper brakes is in fact easy to do, 31mm with a mudguard I’ve done and without 35mm.
That’s before you even get to Vs/Mini-Vs, are there any road based disc framesets that can take 700C 42mm tyres with a mudguard or 50-55mm without, there have been in the not so distant past road based framesets including full carbon that have been able to accept very wide tyres with rim brakes, I know because I have a selection, off the peg from one of the big manufacturers so it has been entirely possible.
Aethetically and functionally a no brainer, explain? The former I understand is subjective, cleaner lines of a caliper braked bike to me look far better, functional, in terms of more weight and less aero for discs as well as being more expensive compared to similar spec bike how is a disc braked bike better functional/wear wise on carbon rims except for the very extreme scenario I gave above?
Are you going to argue that outright braking power is functionally better – ignoring the risk compensation aspect of that, also ignore that braking power is totally irrelevant to stopping ability when the limiting factor is tyre grip?
EddyBerckx
joachimvadseth wrote:
joachimvadseth wrote:I live in Norway guys, no riding outside for the next 4-5 months for me anyways. Been on Trainerroad/KICKR Core the last seasons.
I think I could go with 105 and calipers, as the performance is almost identical. My old 6800 groupset is probably less of a performer than the R7000 maybe anyway. But still; non-carbon shifters? Naa.. it must be Ultegra. I cant cheap out on 105. I think Ive decided for the CF SL 8.0 Ultegra with rim brakes. I got a couple of wheelsets to use in the wets anyway.
My current bikes are 53 and 52cm. Canyon says I should go for a XS frame since Im about 172cm. My girlfriends brand new Endurance CF 7.0 with 105 disc is a XS and it feels ok. Even tho Canyon says its no difference between mens and womens bike sizes.
Also, the Aeroad CF SL 8.0 is not avsilable in silver in S, only XS.
I could wait for the new model, but how much better could it be? And do I need it? Definetly no. So a 2019 bike is good enough for me. Question is if the will have a sale and The bike is still in stock at that point.Make sure you’re signed up for their newsletter to get info about any sales that happen…and pull the trigger if they have the bike you want.
Else I think you’re crazy paying full price for a bike that was designed over 5 years ago and is about to be potentially replaced…when you cant ride it for another 5 months anyway!
Your choice anyway. A few of my friends have them and love them, you wont be disappointed
mtbtomo
If its a summer bike, or good
If its a summer bike, or good weather bike, I don’t think disc brakes are there yet so far as being consistently quiet and rub free. So I’d go rim brake.Disc brakes are good for winter when it doesn’t matter about the rubbing, grinding and howling.
Either rim or disc have enough power regardless of conditions and anyone that says they don’t probably needs to look at their set up.
IanEdward
Quote:
Learn to read the roadExactly, reading the road, riding to conditions, if it’s wet it takes all of a few seconds to dry your rims, and frankly, if I’m riding in wet conditions, I have no interest in setting PBs on descents anyway!
A few pieces of rubber grinding away at a wet aluminium rim is no way to stop in an emergencyAnd a few pieces of hardened metal and fibre grinding away at hard steel are? I’m being flippant of course but rim brakes are far better designed than people give them credit for, soft rubber pads are far less prone to the sort of squeeling in wet conditions which puts me off discs altogether, wet winter riding is unpleasant enough without adding humiliating, deafening screeching into the mix. As it happens I ride through some long wet grass on one of my CX training loops and my discs are useless afterwards, they don’t work as well in the wet as everyone claims they do, still need to dry off!
Good Swisstop pads on aluminium rims have seen me through some atrocious weather conditions, riding down a rivulet of melt water on an unploughed road covered in compacted snow springs to mind, and I’m on the same rims as I was two years ago (although sharing winter duties over two bikes helps that).
Anyway, as someone above posted, this argument will never die, it’s down to personal choice, I just find the ‘no brainer’ attitude a bit hard to swallow.
srchar
I know it wasn’t the OP’s
I know it wasn’t the OP’s question. I was just being facetious after the comment about Ultegra being the emotional choice.
I assume the Campag stuff is cheap because it’s 11 speed, whereas the new stuff has 12 sprockets out back. And I’m spreading the word to the road.cc massive because there are a few Campag riders on here and it really is stupendous value for such nice components – Super Record for Ultegra prices.
Welsh boy
srchar wrote:TheBillder wrote:I suppose the other point is that 105 vs Ultegra is a head vs heart debate. This is a specal bike, so will 105 move you in the same way as Ultegra?If we’re talking about being moved, the debate really needs to be Chorus vs Super Record 🙂
H11 shifters & chainset + SR mechs + Chorus chain & cassette currently comes in at £850 on bike24.com, if you fancy a DIY build. That is a ludicrous bargain.
But that wasn’t the question! You have to wonder why Campag stuff is being sold off so cheaply though don’t you.
In answer to the original question, discs every time. A few pieces of rubber grinding away at a wet aluminium rim is no way to stop in an emergency. Learn to read the road; disc brakes are fine; don’t need discs and all the usual arguments dont account for the need to carry out an emergency stop in the wet or the fact that a pair of brake blocks can wear out in 3 or 4 wet winter rides and a pair of aluminium rims can be trashed in 2 winters. A no brainer, disc every time.
srchar
TheBillder wrote:I suppose the other point is that 105 vs Ultegra is a head vs heart debate. This is a specal bike, so will 105 move you in the same way as Ultegra?If we’re talking about being moved, the debate really needs to be Chorus vs Super Record 🙂
H11 shifters & chainset + SR mechs + Chorus chain & cassette currently comes in at £850 on bike24.com, if you fancy a DIY build. That is a ludicrous bargain.
joachimvadseth
And hey, how is the size of
And hey, how is the size of the shifters? (ST-6800 vs R8000) i really like the 6870 Di2s small compact size very well..
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.