- This topic has 68 replies, 26 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 5 months ago by
Stratman.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 17, 2018 at 9:42 am #29203
kil0ran
Had the pleasure of driving a Merc C-Class over the weekend. I say drive but it was little more than turn the wheel every once in a while for 500 miles. So many buttons, so much automation, so much to distract you.
The only redeeming feature was that the ride was fantastic and the seats extremely comfortable.
Visibility was atrocious – privacy glass for the rear windows and windscreen, and huge A & B pillars. B pillar and roof line in particular was so badly-placed relative to the driver that it was almost impossible to see clearly when turning right from a side road. It was also possible to set the driving position so low that I could barely see above the belt-line, and I’m almost 6 foot. Made it tricky to judge gaps and passing distances relative to parked cars. I’ve also worked out why you see cars with gouges in rear doors – reversing cameras only deal with the back of the car, not the sides.
From a safety perspective I liked using the speed limiter (important, because it was so quiet you had very little idea of how fast you were wafting along) but I’d imagine it just encourages drivers to drive at the posted limit all the time, rather than considering road conditions. No other active/passive safety features on this particular car because it was a hire car.
It seems that manufacturers are effectively selling an interior/lifestyle choice rather than a driving tool these days, the car was completely uninvolving to drive, even on Sport+ mode (firmer suspension plus comedy throttle blips as you roll up to stop lines FFS)
On the plus side I now have absolutely no desire to own such a technological marvel.
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
Anonymous
OldRidgeback wrote:Luckily, while bicycles have evolved, new ones are still pretty good to ride. The fun hasn’t been engineered out of them. My new BMX cruiser is a blast.
I want one of those 26″ PK Rippers just for posing. Gave up the BMX a couple of years back now after I got back into it at a late age. Landing on your shoulder in concrete skateparks and not being able to move your arm for days has that effect. It’s great fun being able to get air in your 40s but I was going out dressed like robocop to try and avoid injury and it still found me. People at work aren’t very understanding as well when you’re 40+ and have done yourself in on a ‘kid’s bike’.
Oh to be young again!
OldRidgeback
Yorkshire wallet wrote:OldRidgeback wrote:What I loved about that old generation 911 was the fact that you had to really drive it. Modern cars are boring essentially. That includes the Aston Martin Vantage I drove at Silverstone on a track day a couple of years back. What a boring car. No, I really mean it.I know what you mean. My first car was a 1275gt mini and it felt like I was literally one of the wheels. Same with my Mk2 golf.
My wife just got an Ford ecosport thing and I have no idea where the limit is (not that I been pushing on it anyway) but power steering is so over powered there’s no feel in the wheel at all. She has a Clio before that and I just got nothing through the wheel as you could literally turn it with a finger.
I remember my old man’s early 80’s passat. Clutch that required quads of steel, no power steering and brakes that made you see god.
A friend had a Mini Clubman with a Cooper S engine back in the day. It felt like it cornered on rails. It made a great noise too. Sure, my modern Ford is quicker, but not so much fun to drive.
For the old 911s you really need quads of steel to change gear. They have a stiff clutch with an unusual ‘over the top’ action. My wife’s cousin has a mid 80s 930 Turbo and it’s the same. Now that really is a fun car to drive!
Luckily, while bicycles have evolved, new ones are still pretty good to ride. The fun hasn’t been engineered out of them. My new BMX cruiser is a blast.
Anonymous
OldRidgeback wrote:What I loved about that old generation 911 was the fact that you had to really drive it. Modern cars are boring essentially. That includes the Aston Martin Vantage I drove at Silverstone on a track day a couple of years back. What a boring car. No, I really mean it.I know what you mean. My first car was a 1275gt mini and it felt like I was literally one of the wheels. Same with my Mk2 golf.
My wife just got an Ford ecosport thing and I have no idea where the limit is (not that I been pushing on it anyway) but power steering is so over powered there’s no feel in the wheel at all. She has a Clio before that and I just got nothing through the wheel as you could literally turn it with a finger.
I remember my old man’s early 80’s passat. Clutch that required quads of steel, no power steering and brakes that made you see god.
RichChorlton
I know it’d never happen, but
I know it’d never happen, but now that we can make small, smooth engines, is there any practical need for a road car to have more than about 75 horsepower?
I’ve got a 180hp car and I like it, and I realise that’s not even that powerful any more, but all the extra power does is help me do dangerous things really.
I wonder if we should actually ban powerful cars now. Then we could concentrate on making things more efficient and probably smaller. I can’t imagine a 75hp range rover would be much fun, but maybe that’s not such a bad thing.
brooksby
Simon E wrote:
No contest.brooksby wrote:Simon E wrote:Sorry, but if we’re gonna go retro then NOTHING will top a Mini Cooper.I see your Mini Cooper and raise you a VW 1302S.
Crap heater, worse handling, noisy and barely altered since the 1940s. Our 1972 Beetle had the most uncomfortable vinyl rear bench I’ve ever had to sit on. Not great when you’re trying to sleep in a lay-by at night on a trip to Scotland at the age of 9.
Driving home in falling snow, my Dad had a head-on with another car at a claimed 15mph* and headbutted the windscreen, which popped out in one piece.
It never ceases to amaze me why, ‘characterful’ appearance apart, people actually like them.
* I’ve always found it difficult to believe he was driving that slowly, even in those conditions and piloting a car known for losing front grip thanks to the engine being over the rear axle.
The noise? I like the noise. It reminds me that I’m driving a machine powered by an internal combustion engine which works by burning and exploding petrol

My wife had someone slip on ice and glide into the back of the Beetle. No damage to the Beetle, but you would have thought that the other car had sped into a wall. Modern newfangled plastic bumpers, eh…?
And, you can’t tell me that a Mini Cooper is some kind of yacht, surely? My wife’s sister and her husband owned one – I remember (nightmares, frankly) trying to eat fish and chips sitting in the back of their Cooper…

Simon E
No contest.brooksby wrote:Simon E wrote:Sorry, but if we’re gonna go retro then NOTHING will top a Mini Cooper.I see your Mini Cooper and raise you a VW 1302S.
Crap heater, worse handling, noisy and barely altered since the 1940s. Our 1972 Beetle had the most uncomfortable vinyl rear bench I’ve ever had to sit on. Not great when you’re trying to sleep in a lay-by at night on a trip to Scotland at the age of 9.
Driving home in falling snow, my Dad had a head-on with another car at a claimed 15mph* and headbutted the windscreen, which popped out in one piece.
It never ceases to amaze me why, ‘characterful’ appearance apart, people actually like them.
* I’ve always found it difficult to believe he was driving that slowly, even in those conditions and piloting a car known for losing front grip thanks to the engine being over the rear axle.
brooksby
OldRidgeback wrote:New cars are designed for passenger protection, with much thicker roof pillars. They really do obscure the view. Our current Ford Focus has a particularly large blind spot at the rear. You do have to be very careful.New cars are also packed with driver assitance technology. My feeling is that these encourage drivers simply to drive to the limits, and don’t actually improve overall safety. Worse still, features like cruise control can lull a dozy driver to inaction/sleep, as one poster mentions earlier on.
Exactly. My Beetle, and my wife’s VW microbus (1973 vintage), are probably both a bit rubbish for passenger protection. Made out of thin metal, no airbags, ancient brakes, etc.
But – and this is the thing – we know that, and we drive accordingly. In the wet, or going round bends, or down hills, you slow down because you know your brakes’ effectiveness. There’s no ABS gubbins to pick up the slack, so you drive more carefully.
OldRidgeback
I rented a classic late 70s
I rented a classic late 70s Porsche 911 some years back (a 911T). I was amazed at the fantastic all-round visibility. It had large windows and narrow pillars.
New cars are designed for passenger protection, with much thicker roof pillars. They really do obscure the view. Our current Ford Focus has a particularly large blind spot at the rear. You do have to be very careful.
New cars are also packed with driver assitance technology. My feeling is that these encourage drivers simply to drive to the limits, and don’t actually improve overall safety. Worse still, features like cruise control can lull a dozy driver to inaction/sleep, as one poster mentions earlier on.
What I loved about that old generation 911 was the fact that you had to really drive it. Modern cars are boring essentially. That includes the Aston Martin Vantage I drove at Silverstone on a track day a couple of years back. What a boring car. No, I really mean it.
hawkinspeter
From here: https://www
From here: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/black-cabs-taxis-air-pollution-london-research-true-icct-a8688141.html
Some newer models of the black cabs were found to emit even more pollution than older models.The Chinese-owned London Electric Vehicle Company, formerly known as the London Taxi Company, based near Coventry, makes the TX4 Euro 5 model which was found to produce at least 50 per cent more NOx than either of the company’s earlier Euro 3 or Euro 4 models.
This means the average NOx emissions from black cabs have risen, per kilo of fuel used, over the past five years.
The research shows Euro 5 models along with older models are responsible for about 60 per cent of greater London’s NOx emissions from passenger cars.
Euro 5 and Euro 6 diesel cars are on average producing six times more NOx than equivalent petrol cars, the research adds.
brooksby
Simon E wrote:Sorry, but if we’re gonna go retro then NOTHING will top a Mini Cooper.I see your Mini Cooper and raise you a VW 1302S.
Our family Beetle – yes, she does have a name too, but I’m not telling you – is a 1970 1302S. No cassette player or 8 track. No cigarette lighter. No clock. Always starts first time, reliable, steady. Parts are cheap, everything is easy to access – you can do pretty much everything with a screwdriver and a socket set. 1600cc engine and four gears, can hit 80mph on a downhill on the motorway (once, by accident, with a tailwind
).
Simon E
Sadly true.Griff500 wrote:[quote
…. And too heavy.Griff500 wrote:[quote=Kapelmuur]It’s not been mentioned that cars have grown too big.
When I replaced my MK 2 Polo (800kg) with 1.2L Fabia I found the newer car is both bigger all round and weighs half as much again yet the amount of interior space is almost identical. The performance of the 54bhp 1.2L 3-cylinder engine is certainly less responsive.
It has much fatter A-pillars and 3/4 panels so visibility is worse so I’m less confident reversing into small spaces. And this a 15 y/o bottom of the range model. I won’t want to replace with a newer car because with the ever growing degree of unnecessary complexity and proprietary parts etc in each one I probably won’t be able to afford to have anything fixed.
Sorry, but if we’re gonna go retro then NOTHING will top a Mini Cooper.Yorkshire wallet wrote:Put some extra lamps on and this is about as far as cars needed to evolve.
Anonymous
my first half decent car
my first half decent car (after the W reg 1.3 MKII Escort I bought off grandad), was an ex company MKII VX Astra.1.3L SOHC with 75bhp. Enough room for 5 adults, bloody good sized boot, weighed 880kg and my regular fuel economy was 46mph with a max of 55mpg if I really held the needle @ 56mph (done a few times up to peterborough. For a petrol engine at that time and that size car there were few if any that could match it. acceleration was decent, handling whilst not sports like was fine given the 155/13 wheels.
No power steering, no leecy windows but it had a sunroof! I took it to 189,000 miles (put 125k on it in 6 years) before the rust got the better of it and it was still running despite a cracked valve so I was able to drive it to the scrap yard … I got £1!
Whilst the estate was a bit of a munter the MKIII was nicer and gained power steering and bigger wheels but again was heavier due to all the bits n bobs manufacturers started throwing into motors, particularly crash protection stuff and river aids like power steering and mod cons like electric windows.
I got creamed from behind in the MKII whilst sitting at lights, I had a sore neck for a few days but that was it, the other party’s motor was a write off, the Astra was repaired and had a new exhaust, I bloody loved that car, it got me through the Lake District one January when it was snowing and most others were sliding on compacted snow or ice just outside Barrow.
If the Astra had the latest frugal injection engine and a radio I’d buy that, well except I probably wouldn’t cos I don’t really need a car any more. Don’t want/need anything else. IMO the main reason why fuel economy hasn’t really moved on since the late 80s in petrol cars is weight, of course increased power draw and aerodynamics not changing much also has an influence.
New Nissan Leaf is heavier than my 2001 Passat Estate (which at 1440kg is no lightweight!), it’s no wonder electric cars struggle for range unless you buy/rent even bigger polluting batteries!
A sub 800kg mid sized car with a modern petrol engine and driven sensibly would I reckon get you 60+mpg average. Problem is in this H&S festoone era and governments allowing distracted driving modules/entertainments systems in motors as well every driving aid possible motor weights have just got greater and greater and only changing to more expensive metals can offset some of that.
Bmblbzzz
Kapelmuur wrote:It’s not been mentioned that cars have grown too big. Every new model is longer and wider than the one it supersedes. For example, the current VW Polo is bigger than an original Golf.I ride mainly on rural roads and lanes and am constantly menaced by the enormous 4 x 4s that appear to be compulsory in Cheshire. They fill the width of the road and very few attempt to pull in for cyclists.
And part of the reason they’re getting bigger is not for any driving or even ergonomic advantages, it’s simply “so I can see over the other cars”.

don simon fbpe
kil0ran wrote:Yorkshire wallet wrote:A sensor in my car has gone that’s not even related to ESP but because this one sensor has gone it’s turned off my ESP. I’m sure there’s some Audi logic somewhere but I can’t see it. Don’t need ESP anyway as the 4wd kicks in better without it and I don’t need the over intrusive braking, sometimes you need to push a little over the traction limit to get the best out of it.Climate control has failed in my Passat. It’s a nylon cog that’s stripped on a motor buried deep in the dash. Need to rip the dash out to replace it – not much change from 12 hour’s labour. Means I have no heat in the car and can’t keep the windscreen clear. Car simply isn’t worth fixing, and all because someone in marketing said that Passat-buyers demanded automatic climate control, rather than having a manual slider to switch the airflow from hot to cold.
And that’s a 2005 car – one of these modern lumps is so integrated that if anything electronic fails it’s hours and hours of labour to fix.
Has it got a dipstick? My 2016 Volvo doesn’t have a dipstick so when the oil warning light comes on the main dealer has to plug it in to the computer so they can find out how much oil to put in.
Grahamd
freespirit1 wrote:Yorkshire wallet wrote:Put some extra lamps on and this is about as far as cars needed to evolve.
I had one of those!!
Gutted when I had to sell it
Likewise, especially as I had paid to have a cassette player fitted.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.