Carbon rims and descending big hills………..

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #27264
    richcrocker79

    I know this question has been done to death historically, but all of my recent googling brings up links and horror stories from four or five years ago.

     

    My question is reasonably simple, I have a set of Fulcrum quattro carbons which i love. I am heading to France in a couple of weeks, staying near Mont Ventoux and riding up and down it a few times. Will I die on the descent if I use the Fulcrum rims? they have the 3Diamant braking surface, which is supposedly fine, but the best I got from Fulcrum was ‘we’ve never had any complaints about the braking surface’

     

    Has anybody had any real world experience of a current technology set of carbon clinchers on long steep descents? I know they will get hot, I’m aware of not dragging brakes etc. but will they fail?

     

    Thanks

     

    Rich

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #895773
    0
    redmeat

    Got back from the Alps two
    Got back from the Alps two weeks ago. My friends Vision Metron 40s melted descending Col de Sarenne, leaving him with no brakes (pads shredded) and having to get a lift to the bottom of the mountain. Real world experience.

    #895771
    0
    bmstewart2004

    Hi  

    Hi  

    I have new Campag Bora Ones Carbon rims and Campag Neutron Ally’s.

    I’m using the Neutrons for the MAratona on Saturday.

    Reason being I’ve done a couple of Etapes in the past (2010/2011), the Marmotte in 2013, Challenge Vercors 2014 and Ventoux Sportive last year.

    On the first three events I’ve seen puncture’s and destroyed carbon rims probably due to over braking/ dragging brakes.

    I’ve done a reasonable amount of riding in France and subscribe to the descend fast and brake hard theory to allow rims time to cool. However when riding in the bigger sportives there are so many riders about the a certain amount of rim dragging is inevitable as you have to take account of other riders speeds and cornering lines.

    Also the weather looks sketchy for the Maratona and the braking performance of the Neutrons is streets ahead of the Bora’s in the wet despite the “new, improved” braking surface.

    Only my opinions though.

    Cheers – enjoy the event!

    #895769
    0
    Jimmy Ray Will

    I think Martyn is on the

    I think Martyn is on the money. whether or not you are going to push the rims, if you are concerned, I’d chuck on a set of alloy rims and be done with it.

    If I was going for a cycling holiday in the mountains, it would be my choice… as said above, purely so its something that I won’t have to think about. 

    #895767
    0
    Martyn_K

    Let’s roll this back a little

    Let’s roll this back a little and forget about all the armchair engineers. Reflect and take a look at yourself, you are obviously concerned hence the questions.

    I’m by no means a fast descender but enjoy a downhill and will progress through corners with as much speed as possible. I ride 45mm carbons as an everyday wheel and weigh in at 67-70 kg (time in season dependant!).

     

    In the Alps last year the bike had alu Campag Zonda’s fitted for peace of mind. I’m sure the carbons would have been fine but i did not want to take the risk. I ride in Majorca every year so am happy with descending for a longish time (compared to UK) but alpine drops are another level.

    You need to ask yourself if you will be able to dismiss this doubt you are having. Coming down large mountain passes at speed you need your whole focus to be ‘in the moment’. You need to process your speed, the feel of the road, shape of the road, oncoming dangers etc etc.

    You don’t want to then have the additional variables of ‘should i brake now or later on these carbon rims?’, ‘How mush braking have i already done?’, ‘Are the rims heating up?’. Small lapses in concentration on mountain passes can result in not so small issues.

    Bang a set of alu’s on the bike. Have peace of mind. Know that if you need to drag the brakes you have a little more wiggle room. At the end of the day having a great trip and having awesome stories to tell is much more important.

     

     

    For the record comparing club riders to pro’s in this circumstance is a chalk and cheese approach. Pro’s have closed roads meaning that they have 50% more tarmac to play with. More tarmac, equals easier cornering, equals less braking.

    #895765
    0
    wycombewheeler

    madcarew wrote:

    madcarew wrote:

    Incidentally, my basic engineering tells me that Energy is proportional to speed squared, so if braking late and hard as suggested by many (to allow the rims time to cool down) I think is probably not good advice, as ultimately the rims have to get rid of more heat (as speed will have built up more in the interim). A safer approach would be to not let your speed get so high in the first place, but still corner as quickly as you can (to reduce the amount of speed loss required). I’m quite happy to be put right by someone with good engineering knowledge. I imagine it is possible (but I think unlikely) that the rate of heat transfer through the carbon may affect the answer.


    You are neglecting the air braking energy dissipation. The more energy lost to wind resistance the less that has to be lost through the brake pads. By braking as little as possible speed is kept up and less energy heats the wheel. After all at the top energy is proportional to elevation. This becomes kinetic and then becomes heat either in the air (dispersed and negligible) or in the brake pads and wheel.
    The worst thing to do would be drag the brakes and descend the entire mountain at 20kph.

    #895763
    0
    freebsd_frank

    madcarew wrote:

     

    madcarew wrote:
    Actually CFC has a higher specific heat capacity than alloy (1.1J /gdegC on average cf  0.9 J/gdegC for alloy).

     

    You seem to have quoted a figure for aluminium which is not necessarily the
    same as when it has been alloyed with whatever.

    Ditto with CFC. The heat capacity of the fibres can vary wildly as can that of the matrix material.

    Quoting average figures is completely worthless because the distribution is so wide.

     

    madcarew wrote:
    The conductivity in alloy is the key to the heat loss. Alloy will cool down
    faster.

     

    Correct. It’s why the heatsink on my GPU in this computer is made of Al alloy.

    Wake me up when they make them from CFC.

     

    madcarew wrote:
    Your described result is very different to the real world experience of most people using carbon composite wheels.

     

    Pray tell me: what percentage of these people with CFC rims ride up and down
    alpine passes?

     

    Huw Watkins wrote:
    Mavic’s coments from one of their recent wheel launches:

    [i]”At the 2015 Etape du Tour, for example, Mavic assisted with 100 wheels, of
    which 52 were failures and 38 were carbon clinchers that had delaminated,
    product manager Maxime Brunand said.”[/i]

     

    Mavic’s real world experience seems to considerably differ from yours.

    They’re busy flogging CFC wheels too, so it’s hardly in their interest to
    mention such damning stats.

     

    madcarew wrote:
    The amount pros are paid has nothing to do with the likelihood their wheels will fail as you’ve described.  And they like to do it day after day, their livelihood depends on it so they’re not going to do it on something that fails with the certainty you’ve described.

     

    You’re entirely wrong. The pro’s will do whatever is required of them if you
    bung them enough money.

    Shoot up with whatever the latest performance enhancing drug is without giving
    a rat’s arse about the physical damage it could be doing to them?

    Sure. They’re young men on the make and every man has his price.

    If they were told to do Alpe D’Huez on a Raleigh Chopper having ingested a
    truckload of Ritalin, they’d be more than up for it….given suitable
    financial compensation and being told by the team manager that [i]”You want to
    get along in the team, don’t you?”[/i]

     

    madcarew wrote:
    As for pros going down faster and not braking as much: they corner at ‘similar ‘ speeds to a good club cyclist (what you’d go round the corner at 20 mph, they’ll do at 25 mph; however they’re slowing down from 60+ mph instead of 45 – 50 mph, which means they actually do 60% more (energy loss from) braking, or allowing for your club cyclist to be 20% heavier (85kg vs 70kg) they are still doing 45 – 50% more braking; so if it can stand up to the pros, it can stand up to a club cyclist (YMMV)

     

    You’re pulling figures out of your arse again. There is absolutely no reason
    why I can’t get up to “60+ mph” coming down an alpine pass if I choose to.

    At least I can stand assured that my wheels aren’t going to come apart when I
    come to brake.

     

     

    #895761
    0
    FatAndFurious

    To be up front, I’ve not used
    To be up front, I’ve not used carbon rims, so have no direct experience. However, I rode the Ariegeoise today and most climbs were fog bound so the roads were a bit sketchy. You need a lot of nerve to brake hard on roads like that. I saw 4 carbon wheeled bikes upside down with their owners carefully turning the wheels. It looked like they were looking for rim/brake rub. Didn’t stop to ask though, so may have it completely wrong. My route had a summit finish and we were moto escorted back down to the event ‘village’. It was a measured pace, let’s say, so you couldn’t do the “fast down, brake hard” option described above, and based on the noises there was a lot of brake dragging going on. The guy in front of me had his front wheel rim deform. On the same event two years ago, in similar conditions, I helped out a guy roadside whose front wheel had started to deform. His only option was to open out his front brakes to stop them rubbing against the rim.

    My take from all this is that carbon rim brake wheels are likely just fine if used considerately, but may be more prone to failure if not. Conditions may mean you can’t do so.

    Just one Internet user’s observations and inferences, worth what you paid for it.

    #895759
    0
    Canyon48
    Sniffer wrote:
    wellsprop wrote:
    No real world experience, but…

    Look at the speeds the pros were hitting in the Tour de Suisse, 120kph+, their wheels didn’t fail.

    Not to say they don’t fail – ever seen the video of the guy riding a Canyon down Mount Ventoux and he overheats the pads?

    Comes down to how heavy you are and how much breaking you are doing. Personally, I wouldn’t be too worried about using a pro level set of carbon wheels on a descent, one would hope that they have been tested and designed against failure.

    Not sure Pro experience helps the OP.  Pros don’t ride clinchers, they ride tubs. 

    Yeah, fair point, totally forgot to think about that!

    #895757
    0
    pablo

    All depends on your
    All depends on your confidence level if you brake alot on decents in the UK then in the Alps I wouldn’t ride carbon.
    I’m not that confident decending when we did d’huez last year I was the slowest down. I wouldn’t run carbon some of the decents are over 20k and my wheels were a little warm. I have to force myself not to brake drag.

    #895755
    0
    redspear999

    I had a similar concern for a

    I had a similar concern for a recent trip to Mallorca; ride carbon clinchers (DCR premium rims) or swap to alloy rims. Took the carbons and all turned out fine. Probably not as testing as ventoux/alps though but they survived descending Sa Calobra for 10km behind a line of cars (constant braking) with no fade at all. I’m 68kg and by no means confident going downhill; much prefer going up! 

    Mind you I’ve had a cheaper set (chinese) delaminate in the past but couldn’t pin point when that happened or why…My guess would be that with half-decent rims and reasonable technique it should be ok…

    #895753
    0
    part_robot

    FFS don’t make this about

    FFS don’t make this about cycle helmets 

    And watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ET1jRVynOBA and its sequel.

    #895751
    0
    Anonymous

    There are a fair few slopes
    There are a fair few slopes in the UK you can hit 50mph whilst being ‘sat up’ so that isn’t enough, you must apply some braking otherwise on slopes such as the one the OP is attempting could mean they are still going to be going faster than is safe for them or what they feel comfortable at.

    As I posted previously regarding choice of descents, I agree with your ‘smaller hills’ comment. Getting into bother on high speed slopes can have horrendous outcomes and there was one here on road cc from in the UK where it seemed apparent the rider bit off more than they could chew and paid for it dearly.
    A friend of mine came off badly three years ago in Spain, luckily only knckering his knee and a severe concussion..
    This is part of the reason why I think cycle helmets are dumb, too many get overconfident and wouldn’t take as much risk without a helmet.
    See far too many close calls in the last 10years or so, nothing like it used to be. Overtly aggressive and much higher risk too often ending in a spill is the norm these days

    #895749
    0
    Nixster

    Good advice on technique

    Good advice on technique above (except the keep braking between corners suggestion, don’t do that) regardless of rim material. To which I would add, if you want to slow down between corners, sit up. Wind resistance will limit your speed. Then get in the drops for the twisty bits. 

    If you’re not confident transitioning between tops and drops at speed, pick smaller hills. 

    #895747
    0
    CXR94Di2

    When I was in Tenerife on a

    When I was in Tenerife on a cycling holiday one of the chaps had a lovely Pinarello Bike with some Enve carbon wheels.  After one day of descending Mt. Teide, he was down the local cycle shop to hire some basic alloy rimmed wheels.  He was very concerned how hot the rims were getting under long repeated braking periods.  He thought his rims would delaminate or tyre explode.

     

      I on the other hand, had carbon wheels with disc brakes and had no issues at all yes

    #895745
    0
    madcarew
    freebsd_frank wrote:
     

    The problem with carbon fibre composite rims as compared to Al alloy rims is
    that CFC does not have a specific heat capacity anywhere near that of Al alloy.

    What this means is that if you apply a certain amount of energy by way of heat
    to a certain mass of CFC, it’s temperature will rise considerably more than
    the same amount of energy applied to the same mass of Al alloy.

    That scenario is what happens when you’re going down an alpine pass. You’re
    scrubbing of your speed big style and the energy you have is proportional to
    your mass and velocity. You “lose” that energy when you apply your brakes but
    it is largely gained by your rims resulting in a rise in temperature of the
    material that they’re fabricated from.

    Al alloy: No probs. Large specific heat capacity. No failure of the rim or
    glue attaching tub to said rim.

    CFC: Big probs. Low specific heat capacity so the rim gets hot enough for the
    matrix material in the composite to melt – it’s just some shitty old polymer,
    after all. Result? The walls of the rim fall apart, your tyre comes off and
    you faceplant…if you’re lucky. If you’re unlucky, you’ll go over the edge
    and an ambulance will come along and scoop up the bits of you they can find at
    the bottom of the valley.

    I hear people saying: “But the pro’s ride CFC rims”.

    Sure they do. But they’re paid a pile of money to do so; you’re not.

     

    Actually CFC has a higher specific heat capacity than alloy (1.1J /gdegC on average cf  0.9 J/gdegC for alloy). The conductivity in alloy is the key to the heat loss. Alloy will cool down faster.

    Your described result is very different to the real world experience of most people using carbon composite wheels.

    The amount pros are paid has nothing to do with the likelihood their wheels will fail as you’ve described.  And they like to do it day after day, their livelihood depends on it so they’re not going to do it on something that fails with the certainty you’ve described.

    As for pros going down faster and not braking as much: they corner at ‘similar ‘ speeds to a good club cyclist (what you’d go round the corner at 20 mph, they’ll do at 25 mph; however they’re slowing down from 60+ mph instead of 45 – 50 mph, which means they actually do 60% more (energy loss from) braking, or allowing for your club cyclist to be 20% heavier (85kg vs 70kg) they are still doing 45 – 50% more braking; so if it can stand up to the pros, it can stand up to a club cyclist (YMMV)

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 48 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.