- This topic has 36 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
madcarew.
-
CreatorTopic
-
December 19, 2016 at 9:06 pm #26591
listerine
Hi,
I’m a long time cyclist, but am a beginner at group cycling. I recently joined a cycling club, and have found my inaugural rides with the group pretty uncomfortable, primarily because the group rides in a way that I’m unusued to, and seems potentially less than optimal from a safety perspective.
– the front left rider invariably rides closer to parked cars and the kerb than I ordinarily would – some 30-50cm away, leaving very little space to avoid potholes and drain covers. If I ride further out, I break up the flow of the group.
– the group is very reluctant to take a full lane, even when to do so makes sense. The front riders will swerve left where there is space between parked cars, and lead or rear riders shout to ‘single out’ when there is a car waiting to pass, even when to pass would be unsafe (e.g. blind corner with solid white lines). In my last ride, this resulted in two drivers trying to pass, then having to abort half way through.
Am I being overly sensitive as a beginner, or do I have a legitimate cause for complaint? What do you suggest I do?
Thanks,
Michael
–
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
beezus fufoon
peted76 wrote:Sounds like this whole thread is a bit of a non question, you’re in a group of mixed abilities and ages, some who appear not to have ridden together before, some are a bit serious and grumpy some are chatting and carefree, it’s in France after the etape… meh!As a newbie, I guess it’s good that you recognise some non fluid riding styles, but from someone who rides with all sorts of groups, I find you need to recognise and adapt to the group dynamic and or be prepared to promote a particular group dymanic.
So in answer to your first post, yes you are being a bit of a sensitive snowflake 🙂
I think you’ve confused me with the original poster – I was just retelling a story from over 10 years back about an incident that stuck out – no real clear hierarchy or articulation of the rules, and as Jimmy Ray Will said, “no one ever takes the time to constructively tell them what they should be doing… instead there is the unvocalised forcing of will upon them” – of course I took the piss out of the old duffers!
edit – I’m one of the old duffers now, but I have learnt to not try to impose an unspoken set of rules by sheer force of will on an unsuspecting group of riders, competent or otherwise!
peted76
Sounds like this whole thread
Sounds like this whole thread is a bit of a non question, you’re in a group of mixed abilities and ages, some who appear not to have ridden together before, some are a bit serious and grumpy some are chatting and carefree, it’s in France after the etape… meh!
As a newbie, I guess it’s good that you recognise some non fluid riding styles, but from someone who rides with all sorts of groups, I find you need to recognise and adapt to the group dynamic and or be prepared to promote a particular group dymanic.
So in answer to your first post, yes you are being a bit of a sensitive snowflake 🙂
beezus fufoon
fenix wrote:beezus fufoon wrote:fenix wrote:beezus fufoon wrote:one ride I did I was treated like a pariah at the coffee break – the younger riders all had good handling skills, would go through and off briskly, and happily ride two abreast and chat. The “old skool” riders really didn’t appreciate it one bit – they would sit at the front for 5 minutes and slow the whole group down – looking back I guess they were less used to crashes and possibly afraid of breaking a hip or something!Crashes on the club run are to be avoided. If as you say the youngsters had great skills – why did they crash more ? I’m voting for the elders.
If the youngsters want a faster crashier club run – go off by yourselves. The NHS is quite good these days.
This was not a club run, just a one off group ride to see a tour de france time trial stage from a hotel in France. The older, more experienced members of the group seemed overcautious to me.
Obviously it was not a case of wanting a crashier ride, but of having crashed in general – the younger members of the group were far more relaxed, more confident riders, and the older members tried to take charge and impose their own overcautious approach on the entire group.
So was it your club or not ? And were the older riders newly hatched Mamils or veteran cyclists ? As far as I know – crashing hasn’t been invented recently and the older riders are probably just wiser.
If the pace was too slow – why didn’t you just tell them you wanted to get there a bit quicker and go up the road ?
And was overcautious just ‘riding a bit slower than you like’ ?
More questions than answers I’m afraid !
no not a club, we’d all done the etape a few days earlier and there were riders of mixed abilities and experience in the group – I saw myself as one of the weaker riders. There were two basic social groups together, one of riders in their late 20’s to early thirties, and another of guys around mid to late 40’s, all fairly competent riders.
There seemed to be two issues – firstly, the younger guys seemed to go through and off a lot quicker, doing one minute turns at the front, and maybe 2-3kmh faster. The older group members stayed at the front for 5 minutes, and obviously the pace slowed a little, but there was no real issue with anyone leaping off the front or getting dropped.
The other issue seemed to be with chatting and taking a more relaxed, fun approach, which seemed to be quite frowned upon by the more serious older group. I guess they thought that we were challenging their “authority” a little.
Perhaps another small factor was a bit of a north-south divide, while not a cause in itself, it did seem to add a little to the idea that the younger group of “southerners” weren’t taking it seriously enough.
Some of the younger members did seem to “fall into line” – trying to associate themselves with the serious riders. I myself was occasionally riding two abreast and chatting – it was a 55km ride each way and I was on holiday, and being used to riding a certain way in London traffic, I seemed to bear the brunt of their displeasure.
We were on French country roads, and while there were some heavy freight coming past at speed, there was also no kerb, so we were actually riding out of the lane and technically off the road over the kerb line.
crazy-legs
I’ve done some ride leading
I’ve done some ride leading for corporate events and at least there they will generally defer to the ride chaperones / ride leaders even though most of the people on it are CEO-type people more used to being in charge than being told what to do.
New members coming into a regular club ride are often very unwilling to take on info or advice and will take an order as unwanted criticism. Similarly, clubs themselves are often very stuck in their ways and won’t take kindly to a newcomer talling them that the practices they’ve evolved and used over the years are actually dangerous!
One key thing is to sort out the calls early on. I’ve heard any number of variations for calling out a car coming towards the group. Car up, car down, car front. Need to be careful cos a group can end up calling out all manner of random crap which at the back of the group, muffled by wind noise, other chatter, car noise etc will simply sound like AAAHH OOHH.
fenix
beezus fufoon wrote:fenix wrote:beezus fufoon wrote:one ride I did I was treated like a pariah at the coffee break – the younger riders all had good handling skills, would go through and off briskly, and happily ride two abreast and chat. The “old skool” riders really didn’t appreciate it one bit – they would sit at the front for 5 minutes and slow the whole group down – looking back I guess they were less used to crashes and possibly afraid of breaking a hip or something!Crashes on the club run are to be avoided. If as you say the youngsters had great skills – why did they crash more ? I’m voting for the elders.
If the youngsters want a faster crashier club run – go off by yourselves. The NHS is quite good these days.
This was not a club run, just a one off group ride to see a tour de france time trial stage from a hotel in France. The older, more experienced members of the group seemed overcautious to me.
Obviously it was not a case of wanting a crashier ride, but of having crashed in general – the younger members of the group were far more relaxed, more confident riders, and the older members tried to take charge and impose their own overcautious approach on the entire group.
So was it your club or not ? And were the older riders newly hatched Mamils or veteran cyclists ? As far as I know – crashing hasn’t been invented recently and the older riders are probably just wiser.
If the pace was too slow – why didn’t you just tell them you wanted to get there a bit quicker and go up the road ?
And was overcautious just ‘riding a bit slower than you like’ ?
More questions than answers I’m afraid !
Jimmy Ray Will
Ah, when you think about it,
Ah, when you think about it, there are soooo many subtle aspects to group riding… its hilarious really.
I love Beezus Fufoons comment… its so true… When a rider is clearly doing something wrong, no one ever takes the time to constructively tell them what they should be doing… instead there is the unvocalised forcing of will upon them… happy times!
The problem I have these days is that it is hard to give any one instruction. I used to be one for giving advice, making observations etc. then I read a load of comments that made it pretty clear that people really don’t want unrequested advice.
So now I keep schtum.
beezus fufoon
FatBoyW wrote:The older riders were not as fit so were struggling to keep up maybe?or you might be like our club young ones. Great skills and individual turn of speed, no concept of how to ride a group, sudden speed changes and going off only to suddenly fizzle out. All of which causes danger in the group and crashes!
Love this thread of grumpy gits! Btw plenty of Castelli on show and assos on our runs.
seriously best to ask who is leading and is the group stopping for mechanicals/punctures before the ride starts, helps everyone to focus on group riding and you know who is leading!! All good
A few things here – lack of clarity about who is leading, and an assumption about what the accepted rules are – on my ride there were no actual incidents, but what was noticable was the way in which it was “expected” we would know what was expected of us, and even after the “rules” were obviously broken, still no one would actually say what those rules were and what should’ve been done differently!
FatBoyW
The older riders were not as
The older riders were not as fit so were struggling to keep up maybe?
or you might be like our club young ones. Great skills and individual turn of speed, no concept of how to ride a group, sudden speed changes and going off only to suddenly fizzle out. All of which causes danger in the group and crashes!
Love this thread of grumpy gits! Btw plenty of Castelli on show and assos on our runs.
seriously best to ask who is leading and is the group stopping for mechanicals/punctures before the ride starts, helps everyone to focus on group riding and you know who is leading!! All good
beezus fufoon
fenix wrote:beezus fufoon wrote:one ride I did I was treated like a pariah at the coffee break – the younger riders all had good handling skills, would go through and off briskly, and happily ride two abreast and chat. The “old skool” riders really didn’t appreciate it one bit – they would sit at the front for 5 minutes and slow the whole group down – looking back I guess they were less used to crashes and possibly afraid of breaking a hip or something!Crashes on the club run are to be avoided. If as you say the youngsters had great skills – why did they crash more ? I’m voting for the elders.
If the youngsters want a faster crashier club run – go off by yourselves. The NHS is quite good these days.
This was not a club run, just a one off group ride to see a tour de france time trial stage from a hotel in France. The older, more experienced members of the group seemed overcautious to me.
Obviously it was not a case of wanting a crashier ride, but of having crashed in general – the younger members of the group were far more relaxed, more confident riders, and the older members tried to take charge and impose their own overcautious approach on the entire group.
peted76
Freddy56 wrote:All club runs need a Club run captain. Regardless from 3 to 30 riders. someone , experienced needs to be in charge, picking the route, callling puncture proceedure and direction. Whistle is great for regular changes at the front and picking the cafe stop.In a sport full of alphas- who shun team sports, an organised individual is necessary to wrangle the egos and opinions.
errr hang on…. There’s a puncture procedure…. and….. you have a whistle!
fenix
beezus fufoon wrote:one ride I did I was treated like a pariah at the coffee break – the younger riders all had good handling skills, would go through and off briskly, and happily ride two abreast and chat. The “old skool” riders really didn’t appreciate it one bit – they would sit at the front for 5 minutes and slow the whole group down – looking back I guess they were less used to crashes and possibly afraid of breaking a hip or something!Crashes on the club run are to be avoided. If as you say the youngsters had great skills – why did they crash more ? I’m voting for the elders.
If the youngsters want a faster crashier club run – go off by yourselves. The NHS is quite good these days.
Freddy56
All club runs need a Club run
All club runs need a Club run captain. Regardless from 3 to 30 riders. someone , experienced needs to be in charge, picking the route, callling puncture proceedure and direction. Whistle is great for regular changes at the front and picking the cafe stop.
In a sport full of alphas- who shun team sports, an organised individual is necessary to wrangle the egos and opinions.
beezus fufoon
one ride I did I was treated
one ride I did I was treated like a pariah at the coffee break – the younger riders all had good handling skills, would go through and off briskly, and happily ride two abreast and chat. The “old skool” riders really didn’t appreciate it one bit – they would sit at the front for 5 minutes and slow the whole group down – looking back I guess they were less used to crashes and possibly afraid of breaking a hip or something!
Bob Wheeler CX
Great thread. Welcome to the
Great thread. Welcome to the real British Cycling. The last thing you’ll see, is that Castelli logo soaring away in front of you…
Mungecrundle
It will take more than a
It will take more than a couple of outings to adapt your riding to the group style. Especially if you are unused to riding in close proximity with other cyclists. It takes a fair bit of trust in the rider in front to sit 4 inches off their back wheel at 20 mph plus. Likewise the niceties of taking a turn on the front, not overlapping wheels, picking up the calls and signals that are vital to group communication. But it’s another set of skills that are fun to learn.If the club has been around for some time it might be fair to assume that the ride leaders are actually reasonably competent. Ultimately though, if you are still not comfortable and depending on how the club is set up, you could suggest breaking into smaller groups or join a steadier group.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.