No Hopers

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #24233
    JC

    After a relatively poor Giro…I was thinking how difficult (or easy) would it be to pick a team of “no-hopers”
    e.g. for the Tour de France pick a purist team that that scores the fewest points
    But you have to use up all of the available credit (or leave less than 5)
    (no 3.0 riders throughout!)
    Canvasing support for the idea/ forum competition

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 101 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #850237
    0
    Moist von Lipwig

    thanks for doing this. Very
    thanks for doing this. Very good idea, especially not being allowed just to pick 3.0s and the like – an alternative picking system I thought of whilst doing this would be to pick a single rider from each of pages 1-5 of the race.

    #850235
    0
    _Kasper

    Gesink 20.2
    Debusschere

    Gesink 20.2
    Debusschere 15.4
    Peraud 18.7
    Farrar 16.5
    Zubeldia 8.6

    79.4

    #850233
    0
    JohnnyRemo

    THOMAS DE GENDT (LTS)
    THOMAS DE GENDT (LTS) 20.2
    DARYL IMPEY (OGE) 20.1
    ROBERT GESINK (TLJ) 20.2
    CYRIL GAUTIER (EUC) 15.7
    RETO HOLLENSTEIN (IAM) 3.5

    Total = 79.7

    #850231
    0
    STEVESPRO 79

    N.ROCHE 16.3
    A.YATES

    N.ROCHE 16.3
    A.YATES 9.3
    J.FUGLSANG 24.5
    S.CHAVANEL 21.2
    S.LANGEVELD 7.4

    TOTAL = 78.7

    #850229
    0
    JC

    See attached – all the teams
    See attached – all the teams so far.
    A few reoccurring names – Boom, Gesink, Chavenal, Oss, Farrar…

    I’m away this weekend so I’ll review any new teams added before the standard Saturday deadline and post an update on Monday.

    #850227
    0
    jc2

    Looking good
    Looking good

    #850225
    0
    leortp

    G. Van Avermaet 30.5
    J.

    G. Van Avermaet 30.5
    J. Debusschere 15.4
    T. Farrar 16.5
    J. Serpa 9.8
    P. Voss 6.9

    #850223
    0
    Gmancervelo

    ALEXIS VUILLERMOZ 16.6
    SIMON

    ALEXIS VUILLERMOZ 16.6
    SIMON GESCHKE 17.3
    DANIEL OSS 16.8
    LARS BOOM 20.8
    ALBERT TIMMER 8.3

    79.8

    #850221
    0
    enrique

    Sanderville wrote:My first

    Sanderville wrote:
    My first pick didn’t qualify….
    What was wrong with your first pick?… 😕

    #850219
    0
    Mike.Franchetti

    This looks great fun
    I’m in

    This looks great fun
    I’m in with

    Damiano Caruso 21.4
    Gesink 20.2
    Westra 16.8
    Huzarski 11.1
    Luis Angel Mate 8.8

    =78.3

    #850217
    0
    sanderville

    My first pick didn’t qualify.
    My first pick didn’t qualify. I’m a prick. Here’s my second attempt.

    Arnaud Gerard 7.1
    Bauke Mollema 21.8
    Tim Wellens 21.0
    Bartosz Huzarski 11.1
    JC Peraud 18.7

    Total: 79.7

    #850215
    0
    rcorbin

    E. Sepulveda  22.1
    S.

    E. Sepulveda  22.1
    S. Bennett 18.3
    R. Valls Ferri 17.6
    J. Pimenta Costa Mendes 12
    J. Guarnieri 8.2

    Total 78.2

    #850213
    0
    jc2

    S Chavanel 21.2
    T de Gendt

    S Chavanel 21.2
    T de Gendt 20.2
    B Mollema 21.8
    J Bauer 9.6
    M Sieberg 5.9
    78.7 – by my calculations

    #850211
    0
    Moist von Lipwig

    S Chavanel 21.2
    T Farrar

    S Chavanel 21.2
    T Farrar 16.5
    C Gautier 15.7
    K Vanblisen 14.0
    D Wyss 10.9

    Total – 78.3

    Cheers

    #850209
    0
    ellethecrab

    Got that all wrong –
    Got that all wrong – sorry!!

    > ALEXIS VUILLERMOZ 16.6
    > DANIEL OSS 16.8
    > WILCO KELDERMAN 16.9
    > RAFAEL VALLS FERRI 17.6
    > MIKAEL CHEREL 10.6
    Total: 78.5

Viewing 15 replies - 61 through 75 (of 101 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.