Gent – Wevelgem in Flanders Fields

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #21052
    livestrongnick

    So teams picked and i’ve got 4 cheapos and couldn’t resist picking this 3.0 rider – Nicola Testi :))

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 54 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #783515
    0
    Twybaydos

    If it was not your game today
    If it was not your game today gkam then well played sir

    Sep wasn’t in purist! 12356 purist 12456 std

    #783513
    0
    Gkam84

    And what if it had come in?
    And what if it had come in? Nothing, I can’t win anything from the game, so if I had come first, the prize would go to second place.

    I can still win schwags, because I am not employed by and take no payment from Road.cc or their parent company đŸ˜‰

    #783511
    0
    STEVESPRO 79

    Gkam84 wrote:I did it knowing

    Gkam84 wrote:
    I did it knowing that I had no chance of winning anything. Unless I had 1,2,3,4, plus the 5 break aways, which was very unlikely.

    I just did it to see how it compares to others scores

    And what if that would have been the closing scenario……. Like I said very amateurish at best….
    I am not sure who annoys me most about the game…You and your rule bending or Enrique`s persistant moaning……..and to be in Enrique`s league is not good…. Rant over….

    #783509
    0
    Gkam84

    I did it knowing that I had
    I did it knowing that I had no chance of winning anything. Unless I had 1,2,3,4, plus the 5 break aways, which was very unlikely.

    I just did it to see how it compares to others scores

    #783507
    0
    chrisdstripes

    13456 for one team, and 1236
    13456 for one team, and 1236 for the other. Happy with that. Remember being criticised by gkam for lack of “community spirit” last year. But in fairness you didn’t do it covertly. A bit shoddy, but scrapping the stage is crazy talk!.

    #783505
    0
    Twybaydos

    123456
    Booooo rescinded!

    123456 đŸ˜€

    Booooo rescinded!

    #783503
    0
    STEVESPRO 79

    Once again I find that a game
    Once again I find that a game that I subscribe for has once again allowed people to cheat by not allowing for the clocks going forward..I think I am right in saying that this happened last year or the year before if not both.. A little amateurish, for a paid for service….

    Having said that I saw the loophole and decided not to take advantage of it…. I have a conscience, and in my eyes its cheating, and I think the entire stage results should be scrapped…

    Disappointed…..

    #783501
    0
    Gkam84

    Just because I help run the
    Just because I help run the game. I have no way of making changes to my team that everyone else has, I cannot cheat

    #783499
    0
    Wig_Billy

    chiv30 wrote:Gkam84 wrote:1

    chiv30 wrote:
    Gkam84 wrote:
    1 Degenkolb 2 Demare 3 Sagan

    So with 50 for the break and 1,3 I’m looking good :evil:

    A few of us will want a stewards enquiry with you and ur break men I think đŸ˜• :W

    Why? The deadline was the same for everyone.

    #783497
    0
    chiv30

    Gkam84 wrote:1 Degenkolb 2

    Gkam84 wrote:
    1 Degenkolb 2 Demare 3 Sagan

    So with 50 for the break and 1,3 I’m looking good :evil:

    A few of us will want a stewards enquiry with you and ur break men I think đŸ˜• :W

    Anyway 1,3,5,6 purist for me

    #783495
    0
    livestrongnick

    1,3,5,6 so far for me
    1,3,5,6 so far for me

    #783493
    0
    Gkam84

    Crap, I swapped in Thomas for
    Crap, I swapped in Thomas for Boonen

    1 Degenkolb 2 Demare 3 Sagan 4 Vanmarcke 5 Boonen 6 Van Asbroeck 7 Tsatevitch 8 Hutarovich 9 Hushovd 10 Roelandts

    #783491
    0
    Wig_Billy

    My purist team finally did
    My purist team finally did better than my standard.

    #783489
    0
    Gkam84

    1 Degenkolb 2 Demare & 3
    1 Degenkolb 2 Demare & 3 Sagan

    So with 50 for the break and 1,3 I’m looking good đŸ‘¿

    #783487
    0
    Gkam84

    Degenkolb wins Demare 2nd
    Degenkolb wins Demare 2nd

Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 54 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.