Fifteen schools in Wales are to have temporary 20mph zones outside the gates as part of  a new £4.5 million Welsh Government programme to improve safety.

The schools in Powys will have a three-year speed limit imposed, mainly where they fall on trunk roads and have been identified as not having safe walking and cycling routes from homes to school.

The move comes as a result of a Welsh Government review of safety on walking and cycling routes to schools, with 56 schools being identified as needing improvements.

Earlier in the year the programme of flashing 20mph signs at key moments in the day was introduced at two schools in Powys, Newbridge on Wye CIW School and Llanelwedd CIW School, and they are now in the process of being made permanent.

Following the announcement, the speed limit will now be introduced at Banw CP School, Crickhowell CP School, Ysgol Bro Ddyfi, Ysgol Gynradd Carno, Llanfair Caereinion CP School, Machynlleth CP School, Buttington / Trewern CP School, Ysgol Glantwymyn, Irfon Valley CP School, Gungrog CIW Infant School, Llandrindod Wells CIW School Trefonnen, Archdeacon Griffiths CIW Primary, Caereinion High School, Builth Wells High School and Crossgates CP School.

Transport Minister Edwina Hart told North Wales News: “Evidence shows that 20mph speed limits can improve driver behaviour and reduce speeds around schools.

“However due to the nature of the trunk road network and some of the long distance journeys undertaken we need to balance the need of the drivers and that is where part-time 20mph speed limits can play a part.

“As well as improving safety and saving lives I hope this will enable more children and young people to walk or cycle to school.

“Where appropriate we have also identified engineering works to encourage active travel to schools. I am committed to improving safety on our trunk road network and for the communities that live nearby.”

In 2011 we reported how Road safety charity IAM said that two thirds of 4,000 people who responded to an online survey it conducted back the introduction of 20mph zones outside schools, but are less keen on physical measures such as cameras or speed bumps being implemented to enforce such a speed limit.

IAM supports the selective introduction of 20mph limits, but national cyclists’ organisation CTC disagrees, favouring it as the default speed limit in urban and residential locations.

Four in ten of those surveyed said that 20mph signs would be the best way to enforce the limit, while only one in five backed the introduction of speed cameras and a similar proportion supported a combination of cameras and road bumps to calm traffic.

Some 38 per cent of respondents said that 20mph zones should be introduced on roads with amenities such as parks and shops, but only one in four supported it being made the default speed limit in urban areas. And while 43 per cent would like to see such a speed limit on the road they live on, only slightly fewer – 39 per cent – opposed that.

And last year we reported how Leeds City Council plans to introduce 20mph zones in hundreds of streets flanking its proposed £29 million CityConnect segregated bike path linking the city with Bradford.

Leeds, which hosted the Grand Départ of the Tour de France last July and has devised the CityConnect scheme as part of its legacy from that, was to to consult with local residents in the areas concerned about implementing up to 40 new zones carrying the speed limit, reports the Yorkshire Post.

The route of what is being termed a “super cycleway,” being build with the help of £18 million from the government’s Cycle City Ambition fund, will run from East Leeds through the city centre and on then to Bradford via Wortley, Armley, Bramley, Pudsey and Thornbury.

In February last year, the council’s director of city development and director of public health delivered a report to its executive board following a meeting with the charity, 20s Plenty for Us.

The report noted that the council has “an overall aspiration for all residential streets in Leeds to have a 20 mph speed limit,” but that “securing public support is needed for the schemes to function most effectively.”