Police in Peterborough are warning people to beware of “bike cannibals” who strip the parts from locked-up bikes – and are advising cyclists to carry parts around with them to avoid falling victim to the thieves.
According to Peterborough Today, there were 798 reported bike thefts in the city in the year to January 2014 – an average of more than two a day, and the figure has risen higher still to around 900 bicycles in the latest year.
Besides providing advice to cyclists such as using two locks and ensuring bikes are left in well-lit, public areas, they are also advising riders, “Where possible take all removable and quick release parts with you.”

But Sam Jones, campaigns co-ordinator at national cycling charity CTC, told Peterborough Today that the issue of cannibalisation of bikes for parts highlighted the need for secure parking facilities.
She said: “For many the risk of theft can be enough to put people off making short cycling journeys, such as to work or the shops.
“Secure bike parking is particularly important. This saves cyclists from the added burden of having to remove vital bike bits such as the saddle or handlebars every time they leave their wheels for a long period of time.”
Bikes stripped of parts are a familiar sight in cities everywhere, and have even given rise to a blog, Halfstolenbike.com, founded by a New York City-based bike theft victim, that combines pictures of them with haiku poetry.

37 thoughts on “Police advise cyclists to take bike parts with them – to avoid falling victim to theft”
So……the police know about
So……the police know about this but instead of doing something to stop it like mounting an operation to arrest the offenders they blame the victims of crime because they have nice shiny bikes.
FATBEGGARONABIKE
Don’t be silly. No such thing has happened. They are giving advice to people who might not be aware of this sort of thing.
Some people on this forum really are fucking stupid.
FATBEGGARONABIKE
It’s Cambs police. They are frikin’ useless!
FATBEGGARONABIKE
I’m sure the police are doing something about it and regularly mounting operations to catch the low-lifes who do this. In the meantime they are warning cyclists to be on their guard. I re-read the original article and can’t see where they are blaming cyclists for ‘having nice shiny bikes’.
I think what we really need is accessible, convenient and secure parking facilities in towns and cities, where we can leave our bikes, without worrying about them being nicked or stripped.
moved
moved
Operations are mounted from
Operations are mounted from time to time using trap bikes. However this is extremely costly in time and resources, two things that the Police don’t have. The majority of thefts are because owners have left them insecure or secured with cheap locks. A new bike park at the railway station has improved things! Most people don’t record basic details such as frame numbers so returning recovered bikes is nigh on impossible!
Vikeonabike wrote:Operations
You’d think it would be way cheaper now with the existence of cheap and fairly small GPS trackers. Rig up some bikes with trackers in the handlebars, saddles and wheels (inside the tire). Then the police can just drop them at crime-ridden spots and wait for the trackers to show movement. Then they can just show up at the house of the thief or the fence.
The start-up cost to work out the details is the most costly part, but the police already has quite some experience with GPS trackers.
Vikeonabike wrote:The
No, poor locking isn’t enough to cause a theft. Unlocked bikes don’t nick themselves. You also need thieves who see bike theft as offering a good reward for the low risk of getting caught and police like Cambridgeshire are happy to keep pulling stunts like this and suggest that they can’t really be bothered with it, thereby making the theives see it as even lower risk.
I’ve done both of those in my local town (including once completely unlocked at Sainsbury because I forgot both locks) and still got all the bike. I don’t do it in Cambridgeshire when I visit, because their police can find time to fine people who get confused by their stop/start cycling-on-pavement lanes but can’t go out and catch thieves.
I know police are overstretched but Cambridgeshire are especially awful at cycle policing lately. That’s probably partly because there are a lot of bikes there but also because of the influence of their police commissioner, who has featured on this site before, I think.
a.jumper wrote:Vikeonabike
I agree with this response. Bikes shouldn’t be nicked (but do get nicked). Any additional requirements or suggestions to prevent theft are by definition focussing on reducing the chances of being a victim of crime. This wouldn’t be acceptable for more serious crimes (suggesting a victim of a violent attack is responsible for preventing the attack on them is unacceptable) so why is it for theft?
The focus should be on the perpetrators, to discourage them from commiting crime, not on the victims, who may do foolish things (leaving a bike unlocked), but don’t deserve, however foolish, to be victims of another persons criminality.
FATBEGGARONABIKE
There’s no blame involved, just sensible advice given what’s happening.
Some of it will appear overkill but all of it lessens the chances of the bike disappearing.
Every time I pick up a loaf
Every time I pick up a loaf of bread at the local Sainsbury’s, I never forget to take inside with me the bottom bracket, headset, and tires just in case.
pullmyfinger wrote:Every time
You have quick release BB, headset and tyres ? Impressive….
They must love you in
They must love you in Sainsbury’s
I had my bike part stripped
I had my bike part stripped once, not ridden to the shops since. And I am actually a bit miffed that it affected me this way.
(Same bike was then proper nicked about 2 months later, from behind a locked door.)
”This saves cyclists from
”This saves cyclists from the added burden of having to remove vital bike bits such as the saddle or handlebars every time they leave their wheels for a long period of time.”
If they take the police advice, they’ll be taking their wheels with them too.
Now I have the perfect excuse
Now I have the perfect excuse to get a trailer for these.
aslongasicycle wrote:Now I
Hmm… You’ll probably have to get two trailers. Y’know, incase they nick the first one.
Peterborough is a city!
Peterborough is a city! that’s the bit that shocked me
GREGJONES wrote:Peterborough
Yep, it has a cathedral which makes it a city.
Unfortunately, you just can’t
Unfortunately, you just can’t leave a good bike on the streets. Save the best bikes for the weekend unless you’ve got secure parking at work and home.
The bike I use as a local runaround was built for the task, with both cheap(ish) components and security additions. How much are your handlebars and shifters worth? Remove two or three bolts and cut the cables, and they’re gone, you can do it in a minute. I’ve seen them listed like that on the usual sites (after upgrading of course).
You can buy pinhead locks for wheels, seatpost and headset and there are cheaper options. The cheapest is to superglue ball bearings into the bolt heads, when you do need to take it apart use acetate (nail varnish remover) to release them.
How about:
“Cyclists are
How about:
“Cyclists are advising police to do some policing”?
Cambridgeshire police
Cambridgeshire police continues its war on cycling… 🙁
a.jumper Don’t be an arse!
a.jumper Don’t be an arse!
The issue here, the same with
The issue here, the same with most things, is that YOUR security and that of your property is YOUR responsibility not someone else’s.
The current trend for crying “VICTIM BLAMING” is crap.
There are very few real victims.
Nearly every victim, if they analyse what has happened to them, honestly, will actually find that the incident could have been avoided or its effect lessened.
Some times, rarely, fate intervenes and there may have been nothing you could have done. Being hit by a motorist on the wrong side of the road on a blind bend, for instance!
There will always be idiots who will cause you problems but how you deal with them so as not to make the situation worse is down to you!
We know there are criminals out there, junkies looking for their next score. If you walk down the street with your £400 phone in your hand eventually A. Junkie is going to ride by and grab it and sell it to his dealer for a tenner!
Same thing goes for your bike. If you don’t put your security settings on Strava or Endomondo then Billy Burglar will visit your shed or garage! Leave said bike outside ASDA/TESCO/Sainsbury et al with anything less than a D Lock and a quality Chain or cable lock, it will be gone. Leave it somewhere where it is not visible and parts or the whole bike will go fairly quickly.
If you have taken “REASONABLE” steps to avoid your bike being stolen or to avoid getting knocked off your bike, then you are a victim, if you haven’t then you are an idiot!
Harsh? Not really, I’ve analysed my own incidents and come down on the idiot side more than once!
The Police are stretched beyond belief dealing with “Partner Agency” issues. Hell they even get calls from the fire brigade to check to see if there is a fire that has been called in or they won’t turn out. Ambulance crews wont turn out to calls where there has been violence previously without Police presence.
Social Care have a list of jobs for Police to do that they haven’t got to before Friday at 4.30pm and then you have all the other safeguarding jobs that need doing!
Not to mention sitting in hospital with people arrested under mental health act waiting for crisis team to turn out (4-8 hours). Add in domestic violence.. Far to prevalent and needs dealing with properly, robustly and carefully (resource intensive), missing persons, police don’t have a lot of time left to deal with crime!
A lot of officers ride bikes, many go out of their way to hunt down bike thieves and return bikes to their owners. I’ve even done it from holiday in France after setting up a bike thief selling a known stolen bike on facebook!.
PS.. rant over.. very tired after a weekend set of nights dealing with IDIOTS (who I do actually appreciate, because they keep me in a job)
This conversation seems
This conversation seems unbelievably stupid to me. One person seems to be saying “it’s not the victim’s fault, it’s the fault of the police.” Another person says “it’s not the police’s fault, it’s the fault of the victim.”
For goodness sake, it’s the criminal’s fault!!
Burglary isn’t the fault of the victim just because they don’t live in a castle is it?
Whatever you do, if a thief really wants something, they’ll get it. You have to balance risk and practicality and sometimes you will have stuff stolen. That doesn’t make the victim an idiot, and it doesn’t make the police useless. But it does make the thief a scumbag who should be punished.
DaveE128 wrote:This
One thousand times this!
Vikeonabike wrote:Leave said
Its such a pity that most larger stores (and many councils) tuck their bike parking away out of the way, and out of sight of the public, then, isn’t it?
I like my QR wheels, but I have to carry an extra cable just to try and make sure they’re still attached to my frame when I return to my bike (next time I need a new wheel I’m going to go for security skewers…).
I swapped out the QR on my seatpost for an allen-key clamp.
The bottom line here is that bikes still owe way too much to the sport of cycling.
If you are using a bike for transport, for actually going place to place, shopping, socialising, rather than doing 100 miles with the club on a Sunday, then you don’t need QR anything.
You need security clamps for seatpost, saddle, wheels; built in or bolt-on lights; and/or one of those electrocuting anti-theft devices like in the original Robocop (you also need a rack, and mudguards, but that’s a separate rant).
.
.
Mean while in other news cops
Mean while in other news cops threaten a 4 year old girl with confiscating her bike for riding it on the pavement with stabilisers and make her cry. This is the reality of how cops see cyclists – soft target and a menace.
The problem here is the
The problem here is the design and placement of cycle parking, so often at a mall or town centre you can’t see the cameras covering the bike racks because there aren’t any.
Get it Datataged then when
Get it Datataged then when the police find them (I know what you’re thinking they wont) at least they will be able to idenify the owners of the bits – arrest them and return parts!!
I don’t see anything much
I don’t see anything much wrong with the police advice, although it might have been nice to have seem some hint in their statement that they are being a bit more proactive.
The issue of bike stripping really gets to me. OK, QR parts are somewhat impractical for security reasons but even bolts only require a small spanner or allen key. I don’t think it takes any longer for me to remove my front wheel with a spanner than with QR. I always use a D lock and secure my wheels with a cable regardless of the QR status of the bike I’m using (cable goes through the bars on the BMXs too) but I still worry about returning to a bike with no seatpost or pedals. Removing lights is a PITA too.
In the car I just stop, get out, hit a button on my key fob and walk away. Is it any wonder utility cycling is so unpopular?
Matt eaton wrote:
In the car
You can get bikes like that – horseshoe locks, bolted on lights, retractable cable lock, alarms – but you won’t see them in the sports shops that pass for bike shops in this country.
Oh and police advice is not to leave anything in your car, either. They’ve little time for that either.
Apparently the police are too
Apparently the police are too busy warning 4 year olds for riding on a path to do a man’s work and actually arrest lawbreakers.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/11460844/Police-warn-four-year-old-girl-for-riding-on-the-pavement.html
Just glad I live in a country that allows me to carry a weapon so I can shoot the scum that dares pilfer my bike.
it’s simple I paid £60 for a
~X( it’s simple I paid £60 for a brand new Tesco value vertigo Picadilly and can go to the shops leave it unlocked only to find sympathy notes and contributions on the saddle when I return. Horses for courses decent bike for proper rides but cheap and nasty for security, it’s still passed many posers on the way!
Lucan07 wrote: Horses for
Yes, but why should I have to endure uncomfortable riding on an inferior or shabbier bike just because I don’t often do “proper rides” – most of my riding is commuting, shopping or just general recreation within 5-10 miles. I have a decent enough bike (approx. £500 with everything on it) and I’d rather the police were more proactive in dealing with the criminals, than me having to dumb down my property.
Maybe they should advise BMW/Jag/Mercedes owners to get something cheaper, older and shabbier to reduce car theft. I think we’d have a bit of an outcry there.
reads like a Bicycle Movement
reads like a Bicycle Movement Alert would be useful for such scenarios (!),
B-)