A row over a cycle lane in Bolton has spilled into the local press, angry residents insistent that a new cycle lane is the cause of rat-running motorists using their street as a cut through and making the route “like a motorway”.
Residents of Lord Street in Farnworth, near Bolton, took to the local newspaper The Bolton News with complaints and claims about speeding drivers putting nursery children in danger and causing damage to parked cars in collisions.
The subject of the ire, however, was not the conduct of road users but a new cycle lane on the main road through the town, Market Street, which was installed as part of a £5m project to boost active travel in the area and was accompanied by new pedestrian crossings.
However, residents of Lord Street claim the cycling infrastructure has made congestion worse and means their road has “become a rat run”.
“You’ll see car after car after car after car,” one local complained to the local paper. “There’ll be seven or eight cars all speeding down because they’re trying to bypass Market Street. If a bus stops there, it will block the road completely, and then they’ll all start cutting through here. And they’re speeding – nobody is going at a respectful speed.
“If we – as people who live here – are trying to park, you’ll have one behind you and one behind you and they will not give you space to park. It’s always been a lovely, quiet street, but it’s become a main road since they’ve started all of these – these supposed improvements or whatever. Who owns a bike? Nobody has seen anybody use it at all.”
Another resident, Philip Tonge, told the local press rat-running drivers were causing damage to people’s cars, clipping wing mirrors and hitting parked vehicles.
“With schools and nurseries being so near, it’s really dangerous for the kids,” he said. “I can see they’re trying to encourage a different way of travelling – but to me it just makes the whole road layout more confusing.
“You’re suddenly mixing pedestrians and cyclists with cars at those junctions where it’s unclear who’s going to have right of way. The other side of it to me is – because you’ve now separated the bikes from the road, it’s harder to spot them. You look in your mirror when you turn left off the road and you can’t see them.”
> Bike lanes crucial to preventing cycling near misses, major new study suggests
Other residents told the paper “everyone’s going to hit each other” and “nobody in Farnworth cycles”.
Sharon Hall added: “We’re worried about the constant amount of traffic and the kids coming out of school – there’s three schools here. In the morning and at team time it’s like a motorway – three cars here have been hit. It’s just dangerous, there’s going to be an accident.
“I don’t know why they’ve done it – you don’t really see anyone on bikes around here, it’s not like a city centre. They’re trying to treat it like that, and as a knock-on effect, the traffic’s cutting through everywhere. This one’s being treated like a main road.”
The local press also heard from a former councillor who said she had opposed the plans when they were approved by Bolton Council. Melanie Livesey also claimed “people can’t get off their drives” and “we’ve got disabled people who can’t get out of their houses”.
A current councillor suggested the congestion and rat-running “problem has been going on for years” but did believe “the Streets for All programme in Farnworth has made it worse with traffic coming off the main road”.
The noise over cycling projects in Farnworth has been long-running. Last April, locals blamed a new cycle lane for “horrendous” congestion and people driving on the wrong side of the road.





-1024x680.jpg)

















36 thoughts on ““It’s like a motorway”: Furious residents blame bike lane for speeding drivers using their road as cut-through, as former councillor claims “people can’t get off their drives””
“And they’re speeding –
“And they’re speeding – nobody is going at a respectful speed.
“You’re suddenly mixing pedestrians and cyclists with cars at those junctions where it’s unclear who’s going to have right of way.”
“everyone’s going to hit each other”
If the above quotes accurately describe the utter incompetence and arrogance of local car drivers, then it’s no wonder that:
“nobody in Farnworth cycles”
Sounds like this is a wake up call to local people to take more care when driving and maybe start following the Highway Code.
If that fails, just keep blaming the cyclists.
Nobody in Farnworth cycles?
Nobody in Farnworth cycles?
Was just about to add my own
Was just about to add my own personal objection ?. I’ve been there several times seen plenty of people about on bikes and to the “No one cycles in Farnwoth”. Why’s they’re a cycle instruction group based in your town plus an ebike store? It’s on the map ?
I can’t see anybody walking
I can’t see anybody walking on those footpaths. If you took them out you could have two lanes in each direction and then the cars could really shift it though there.
bensynnock wrote:
But there are only 2 cars actually driving along the road so why do they need any extra space?
Backladder wrote:
The cars are getting bigger.
Im waiting for the ‘That
Im waiting for the ‘That cycle path is making it more difficult for me to charge my electric car’
You know its coming
These people spout enough
These people spout enough nonsense already. No need to put words into their mouths.
Its already happening tbh.
Its already happening tbh.
Smoggysteve wrote:
Well, not the cycle lane bit, but as good as.
A couple in my village have bought an electric Ford Transit van: they have nowhere to charge it, so they park it on the pavement, completely obstructing it, while they charge it. Multiple complaints to the police, I made my third tonight, and I’m not the only one, have resulted in no action yet. I will be making sure that something does happen.
It isn’t only obstructing the footpath, it’s parking a 4t vehicle on a pavement that wasn’t constructed to take that weight. We all paid for that pavement, and unless the authorities sue the van owners for its repair, we’ll all pay for it again.
What really gets me is the utter, incredible stupidity of people who buy an electric vehicle, knowing that they have nowhere to charge it. We all make mistakes, but just how dumb can you be?
just how dumb can you be?
just how dumb can you be?
I’m guessing the police have this rated as ‘Maximum Ignore’, priorities…too busy with..etc. Looking forward to hearing the outcome.
eburtthebike wrote:
That’s an argument to make two narrow lanes into one wider one 🙂
Maybe they would be
Maybe they would be interested in making their road a low-traffic neighbourhood.
I’m pleased to see people are
I’m pleased to see people are observing problems and asking questions – they just need help with the solutions which work best for everyone, not just themselves. So:
Good spot – two points there. Having buses “blocking the road completely” has some benefits! First people accessing buses are sometimes hit by drivers trying to get round them, so it might be safer for drivers to stop. Second there are almost always more people in a bus than a car so if it’s a choice it’s better that the individual cars have to wait rather than the passengers. Third reducing the appeal of driving where public transport is available can lead to more people choosing that, which could help make public transport better * and indeed reduce motor traffic overall.
Then: if your problem is through traffic where it shouldn’t be apply LTNs and lure some of that traffic away with ring roads and by-passes.
* Assuming we can avoid those bus companies who have applied the usual corporate shark tactics to get monopolies then screw the customers…
Quote:
Yes, and we’ve got a bunch of tools to help that. LTNs / access-only areas are great – less point speeding if you’re not cutting through anywhere, plus drivers are incentivised to be more considerate in “their” neighbourhood – don’t want to run over your *own* kids… Then when that principle starts to be accepted street design can be tweaked to reinforce slower driving.
Parking? That’s a whole thesis there but ultimately we need to have a look at our assumptions about parking (vast amounts of private property storage in public space, creating some hazards also).
Quote:
Another acute observation – but of course it’s not just right outside schools that kids are at risk. And not a small amount of that risk comes from … people driving their kids to school.
We certainly should have a long hard think about all the schools that are right next to – or very close to – what have become main roads (“it’s like a motorway”).
But but how will the kids get there? How about… walking and cycling on quieter streets, or that bus…?
Thing about cycling is … children aren’t allowed to drive. So your choices are that they get the bus (“but we can’t afford buses, they’re slow and nobody takes them…”), drive them places (taking up your time, adding another car to the problem) … OR fix it so it’s safe for them to walk or cycle.
Active travel – it’s really about making it better for children.
Cyclist are to blame for
Cyclist are to blame for people driving badly.
ok then.
Nobody used the cycle paths
Nobody used the cycle paths in London till they were built; now about 50% of all journeys in London are by bike.
Yes, I remember London with
Yes, I remember London with cycle lanes that weren’t there. I cycled where the cycle lanes hadn’t been built yet.
OldRidgeback wrote:
So, you deliberately didn’t use the wonderful, high quality cycle lanes that hadn’t yet been installed. Typical entitled cyclist.
I would like to know who is
I would like to know who is in charge when these people drive? Is it the driver or is it the car? It’s as if they think there’s some fundamental law of nature, like water flowing downhill, that means that when you get in a car you can’t control how that vehicle moves.
The solution, as always, is simple – block the road off in the middle. You can get in and out from either end but you can’t drive through it.
Yep, an LTN would solve the
Yep, an LTN would solve the rat run driver issue. Somehow the residents would still find time to complain I think.
But the Angry from Bolton
But the Angry from Bolton will complain the Tesco delivery will find it harder to park which means the fat fucker might have to do his own shopping
I would suggest this road has
I would suggest this road has been a “rat run” for many years. Road humps were installed sometime ago. And here is the Streetview from Aug 2023.
Ah, the good old “disabled
Ah, the good old “disabled/elderly people are trapped in their houses by cycle lanes” trope, most memorably deployed by one of our local councillors here in Southwark who in the same statement managed to say both that the disabled and elderly and were trapped in their houses by cycle lanes and also nobody used the cycle lanes, so apparently the aforementioned citizens were incapable of crossing a completely empty track.
Plus, in this case, isn’t it
Plus, in this case, isn’t it a bit more remote – the argument really seems to be “the elderly and disabled are trapped in their homes by the cars that are rat-running down our street to avoid congestion caused by the new cycle lanes somewhere else”.
quiff wrote:
Yes: it’s always the cyclists’ fault.
A modal filter to prevent
A modal filter to prevent through traffic sounds like the solution.
I wonder if the complaining residents would support it.
Why not introduce traffic
Why not introduce traffic calming measures on the effected road? chicanes, sleeping policemen, bollards. That would make it a far less attractive cut through
Youre Welcome
Smoggysteve wrote:
Affected.
eburtthebike wrote:
Intrigued as to why that demanded a correction, but ‘youre’ didn’t.
(Or the idiosyncratic capitalisation, come to that.)
?
Maybe it wasn’t a correction,
Maybe it wasn’t a correction, maybe Burt just thought he was being a bit pretentious.
Bloody entitled cyclists.
Bloody entitled cyclists.
Wherever there’s a cycle lane, there is a lack of happiness.
In fact Miss Marple said there is a lot of wickedness and evil in villages with cycle lanes.
Bert, down the pub, told me
Bert, down the pub, told me that ghost cyclists ride 5 abreast down Market Street lane at night.
The article seems to be
The article seems to be laying the blame at cyclists more than the drivers, cyclist unfairly become the whipping boy again, when motorists are the problem …… sadly typical, this country needs more and proper bike lanes.
The quotes from everyone
The quotes from everyone involved suggests that area has a high volume of low iq ignorant fools .