Home
Verdict: 
Very fast, very stiff and very expensive
Weight: 
7,390g
Contact: 
www.factorbikes.com
Factor Vis Vires road bike
9 10

The Factor Vis Vires is one of the most revolutionary road bikes road.cc has ever tested. With its striking looks, featuring a split down tube, full length fork and integrated stem and Factor-branded and colour matched components, few bikes have been laden with as much anticipation. Few match the £10,000 price tag either.

The Vis Vires is an extraordinary example of what can be achieved when you throw out the UCI rulebook, or selected pages at least. Unhindered by such constraints, Factor has produced one of the most striking new bikes of recent years, packed with innovative features and the best example of integration we've yet seen on a road bike.

Incidentally, the name is Latin for force, power or strength, and it can also mean might, and influnce.

Ride: Sensationally fast

On the road, the Vis Vires delivers on all that promise. It's an exhilarating bike to ride, providing breathtaking performance and handling that lets you exploit the speed it is capable of producing when you turn the pedals in anger.

It devours roads with insatiable speed. It simply barrels along big roads and is happy cruising at ridiculous speeds, really faster than anything else I've ever ridden. We don't have a wind tunnel to verify Factor's claims, but it's abundantly clear the aerodynamic features are fulfilling their purpose. Of course, you still have to pedal the thing, but you're going significantly faster for the same effort.

It's not just the Factor's speed that impresses: it picks up pace rapidly too. Give the pedals a decent shove and the Vis Vires lurches forward. It's immediately apparent from the moment you get on this bike that there is a high level of stiffness from the frame, ensuring it responds to your every input. While it's happy to trundle along at a sedate space, it only really comes alive when you're piling on the watts.

The steering is a little on the fast side, but it doesn't take long to acclimatise and adapt. That novel fork creates a very stiff front end, noticeably stiffer than other top-end bikes I rode at the same time, the Cannondale SuperSix Evo, BMC TeamMachine SLR01 and Bianchi Infinito CV. This produces the most responsive steering I've ever experienced from a road bike, but there is a slight downside: occasionally on very bumpy roads the front wheel can struggle to smoothly follow the surface of the road.

Generally it's very well behaved though. It's impressively comfortable over long rides, but there were occasions — steep descents requiring heavy front braking — that highlighted the extreme stiffness of the fork. Negotiating tight country lanes isn't really the Factor's comfort zone though. It's the big open roads where it's able to stretch its legs that it favours.

The bike fitted me perfectly, which is rare. I usually have to get the Allen keys out and make a few adjustments and changes. The upright stem does give the visual impression of a high front-end, but it's really not the case; the handlebar height was the same as my own bike. It's pretty low. If you like to get low over the front of the bike for an aero position, the Vis Vires won't disappoint. The height and reach is easily adjusted with spacers in the stem. Oh, and the limited steering lock of the fork was unnoticeable during normal riding situations.

Aerodynamic bikes are not usually comfortable. The Scott Foil is a good example of a fast aero bike let down by uncompromising stiffness. The Factor was closer to the Ridley Noah Fast in terms of ride comfort, with a good degree of vibration absorption noticeable through the contact points. It might not be your first choice if comfort is top of your list, but you don't have to fear being beaten up by the Factor even on a longer ride.

While riding the Factor, I was reminded of my time on the BMC TeamMachine, road.cc's Superbike of the Year 2013/14. Both are similarly high-end, carbon fibre race-ready bikes at the bleeding edge of what is currently possible. I revelled in the balanced handling, stiffness, comfort and outright performance of the BMC. The Factor is simply faster in every way, but the BMC is a more rounded package, and is easier on the hills on account of the lower weight. They're close, and that I think is an impressive accolade for a company brand new to cycling, to have produced such a good bike straight out of the starting blocks.

I tried to find fault with the Vis Vires on every ride, but instead finished every ride blown away with the high level of performance. And exhausted, the Factor forces you to ride pretty damn hard. Did I mention I crashed it?

Frame

The reason for all that speed is the unique frame and fork. The most interesting design feature is the split down tube and fork blades that extend right up to the integrated stem.

The down tube is made from two individual aerofoil tubes joined at the top tube and bottom bracket, and braced in the middle to maintain stiffness. The split lets turbulent air from the front wheel pass through the gap, rather than being forced around the down tube. Factor claim this design produces produced 100g of aerodynamic efficiency compared to a non-split down tube in their CFD modelling and wind tunnel testing. That amounts to about one second per kilometre. There's only one other bike that uses anything similar, the Merckx time trial bike from a couple of years ago. Such a design was immediately outlawed by the UCI.

The stem is mounted right on top of the forks. It has an integrated Garmin mount on top, and underneath a space to conceal the Shimano Di2 control box. Yes, the stem does look a bit odd, there's nothing else like it on the market, but it looks better in real life and it certainly grows on you. From a fit perspective, it's easy to move the spacers around the handlebars to adjust the height and reach, between 90 and 110mm.

Integrated brakes are increasingly common on aero road bikes and time trial bikes. Everyone is trying to hide their brakes inside the frame. Factor has used TRP mini V-Brakes, hidden in the back of the fork and under the chainstay. The reason here is to shield the brakes with the frame and so minimise drag. Factor customise the TRP brakes, producing their own linkage pieces and eliminating the external noodle for the internal cable routing.

The brakes provide fantastic performance. There's a lot more power at the fingertips than any caliper brakes, and the power is easily modulated; there's no risk of locking a wheel, even with the carbon rims. The brakes are sufficient to check any excess of speed the Factor is easily capable of. I'd have theses brakes on all my bikes.

The Factor has the cleanest example of internal cable routing I've seen on any bike. There are just no exposed cables anywhere. At the front the cables are routed inside the handlebars, into the stem and from there into the frame. They use full housings as well, so the cables are protected from the British weather right the way from shifter to derailleur or brake lever to V-brake. Luckily each Factor is provided fully built so you don't have to tackle that job yourself.

The aero shaped seat tube houses a proprietary aero seatpost, topped with a one-bolt, and very easy to use, saddle clamp. You can choose from zero to 30mm offset plus the adjustment available on the saddle rails. The seatpost clamp is concealed inside the top tube, and is easily adjusted with an Allen bolt.

The rear half of the frame is a bit more regular than the front, with oversized chainstays and short seat stays. Incorporated inside the non-driveside chainstay is a speed sensor that partners with the Factor Power Cranks. This is the sort of integration we've seen from Trek and Giant.

Build kit: Dura-Ace Di2 and Factor Power Cranks

At the moment you can only buy the Vis Vires with Shimano Dura-Ace Di2, costing £7,999, or with the Power Cranks for £9,999. There is an Ultegra Di2 model coming sometime this year. Factor build the bike with top drawer kit, and throw in a Factor-branded Garmin Edge 810 with a heart rate strap and a Scicon AeroComfort case for taking the bike on your travels.

The Di2 groupset needs little introduction, in fact you're better off reading Mat's in-depth review. Suffice to say, it's excellent in every way. The battery is concealed inside the frame, and the junction box, with the charge port, is concealed under the stem. Shifting is precise, braking with the TRP v-brakes is fantastic, and the ergonomics of the hoods is the best Shimano has ever produced.

An Enve Compact carbon bar, painted to match the frame, provides a good level of stiffness and is a nice shape as well. The Fizik Arione 00 saddle is extremely firm but provided you get on with the shape of a regular Arione, is perfectly comfortable on longer jaunts.

As a package, with the colour matched components, it's a really good looking bike. There's nothing you'd want to change, just set the saddle and bar height, and hit the road.

The wheels are Factor's own, the result of a co-branding effort with a new brand, yet to launch in Europe, called Black Inc. The wheels have a 25mm wide rim that follows the modern wheel trend for a wider profile, with a rounded trailing edge. They're a full carbon clincher design, laced via Aerolight spokes to DT Swiss 240S hubs. With the TRP brakes, the braking performance is stunning, no snatching, just a nice progressive feel, in the dry or wet.

Throwing the bike around and hard sprinting reveals impressive wheel stiffness; there's no noticeable flex or brake block rub. They're good in cross-winds, with little buffeting at higher speeds and wind angles. They're good in a straight line at speed too, and combine well with the frame to contribute to the high speeds the bike is capable off.

The wheels are fitted with Factor-branded Vittoria Open Corsa CX tyres in 23mm width. A very fast-rolling tyre with a great suppleness and high level of grip, they suit the bike well.

Factor's Power Cranks

Not only have Factor designed their own innovative frame and clearly gone to some effort to source top-spec wheels and Factor-branded parts, but they have developed their own power-measuring cranks. They could have used one of the aftermarket power systems available, but clearly thought they could produce something better than those current choices. For a first effort, the Power Crank is a impressive bit of kit.

The cranks use the ANT+ communication protocol and paired easily with the supplied Garmin Edge 810. The crankset is machined from 7075 aluminium and uses the pressfit 386 Evo bottom bracket standard. They're fitted with Praxis Works Clover 53/39 chainrings and weigh a claimed 825g.

Each crank arm is powered by an internal lithium-ion battery and easily charged by attaching the special charger to each crank arm. A recharge takes just three hours and battery life is a claimed 10 hours. I charged them regularly during the test period and didn't have any problems. They're easy to setup and provided consistent and accurate data during testing.

I won't go into much more detail now, I'm hoping to get a long-term test on the cranks so I'll be able to really get under the skin of them. Factor is also currently working on its own data logger, because it claims the cranks offer a higher resolution of data than the Edge is capable of working with.

Verdict

Very fast, very stiff and very expensive.

road.cc test report

Make and model: Factor Vis Vires

Size tested: 56

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

In 2007, bf1systems® turned their attention and focus towards producing the next evolutionary step in road racing bicycles and in 2009 launched the FACTOR001. The ground-breaking design left an indelible impression on bike designs worldwide. Incorporating advanced electronics with over 100 channels of bio-metric data, full hydraulic disc brakes, and lithium polymer battery system supplying power to the on-board computer, sensors, and Shimano Di2 shifting system simultaneously, the FACTOR001 was a bike like no other.

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Standard features include Team Orange paint scheme, Shimano Dura Ace Di2, Factor® Power Cranks, Garmin 810 computer with HRM strap, integrated wheel speed sensor, 45 clincher aero wheels and Factor® AeroComfort bicycle transport bag.

Frame and fork

Overall rating for frame and fork
 
9/10

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

First class.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

Full carbon fibre frame and fork.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

Fairly regular road race stuff, 73.25 degree head angle, 70 degree seat angle, 56.2cm top tube and 985mm wheelbase.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

Fitted like a glove.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

For an aero bike with such a high level of stiffness, it was impressively comfortable, more so at the back than the front really.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

Oh yes. The front end stiffness is higher than most other bikes, creating very direct handling.

How did the bike transfer power? Did it feel efficient?

Yes.

Was there any toe-clip overlap with the front wheel? If so, was it a problem?

No.

How would you describe the steering? Was it lively, neutral or unresponsive? Fast and direct.

Tell us some more about the handling. How did the bike feel overall? Did it do particular things well or badly?

Very fast and lively handling, feels alive.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

The wheels were superbly fast, and good blustery wind conditions. Di2 was impressive too.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's stiffness? would you recommend any changes?

The wheels are very stiff, as are the handlebars and the cranks.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's efficiency? would you recommend any changes?

The cranks are stiff and transfer power well.

Rate the bike for efficiency of power transfer:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for acceleration:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for sprinting:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for high speed stability:
 
9/10
Rate the bike for cruising speed stability:
 
10/10
Rate the bike for low speed stability:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for flat cornering:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for cornering on descents:
 
8/10
Rate the bike for climbing:
 
7/10

The weight shows up a little here

The drivetrain

Rate the drivetrain for performance:
 
9/10
Rate the drivetrain for durability:
 
9/10
Rate the drivetrain for weight:
 
9/10
Rate the drivetrain for value:
 
8/10

Wheels and tyres

Rate the wheels and tyres for performance:
 
9/10
Rate the wheels and tyres for durability:
 
9/10
Rate the wheels and tyres for weight:
 
8/10
Rate the wheels and tyres for comfort:
 
8/10
Rate the wheels and tyres for value:
 
8/10

Controls

Rate the controls for performance:
 
9/10
Rate the controls for durability:
 
9/10
Rate the controls for weight:
 
9/10
Rate the controls for comfort:
 
9/10
Rate the controls for value:
 
7/10

Your summary

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? If I won the lottery, yes.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? If they won the lottery, yes.

Rate the bike overall for performance:
 
9/10
Rate the bike overall for value:
 
7/10

Anything further to say about the bike in conclusion?

The Vis Vires is a fascinating bike. It's stunningly fast with superb handling, and is reasonably comfortable at the same time.The unique fork creates very direct steering that is more engaging that most conventional top-end carbon road bikes, and the split down tube clearly isn't a gimmick.

What you can't do is call it a race bike, as it breaks a host of UCI rules. That's not a problem though, there are plenty of people who want to ride the fastest performance road bikes and not race them, simply to enjoy the experience and thrill of riding a fast bike. And yes it's mightily expensive, but you can easily spec up a top-end frame with top drawer components from any other manufacturer and arrive at a similar price. Unlike those bikes though, the Factor isn't hamstrung by the UCI's rules.

I've not ridden anything as exciting or fast as the Vis Vires before, and unless there is anything else like the Factor on the horizon, I can see anything coming close for a long while

Overall rating: 9/10

About the tester

Age: 31  Height: 180  Weight: 67

I usually ride:   My best bike is:

I've been riding for: 10-20 years  I ride: Every day  I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: road racing, time trialling, cyclo cross, commuting, touring, mtb,

 

David has worked on the road.cc tech team since July 2012. Previously he was editor of Bikemagic.com and before that staff writer at RCUK. He's a seasoned cyclist of all disciplines, from road to mountain biking, touring to cyclo-cross, he only wishes he had time to ride them all. He's mildly competitive, though he'll never admit it, and is a frequent road racer but is too lazy to do really well. He currently resides in the Cotswolds.

42 comments

Avatar
jarredscycling [456 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I can't stop staring a the front end...it just looks wrong. But I really don't get why they went and designed their own power meter. I mean there a bunches of great after market ones they could have used. Although the power meter inclusion at least takes a "little" bit of sting out of that HUGE price tag

Avatar
abudhabiChris [692 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Wow... just wow.

Who are these guys ? I'd like to know a bit more about them.

It'd also be interesting to know all the ways it is non-compliant with UCI regulations - just for a laugh.

Avatar
Ghostie [93 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

The front end kind of looks like it's made out of wood. Probably nicer in black than orangey red. Also available in white. There's a £7999 model as well. Don't know what they forego on that, a bolt? Is a stunning looking bike though.

Avatar
SuperG [102 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Amazing design, but that stem is seriously ugly, prefer the Look 675 type.

Avatar
Bigringrider [177 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It looks vile  31

And haven't they just nicked the idea of the front-end from Wilier's Twinfoil and the split downtube design from a bike that appeared in (I think) the late 80's?

Nice wheels though...I take it co-branding means taking the rather cool Black Inc stickers off a pair of Black Thirty C wheels entirely designed by said company and sticking your own Factor ones on?

Avatar
robthehungrymonkey [141 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

IMO it's awesome. Looks pretty good (apart from the stem, but still better than having the Di2 box on show). But it's the concept that I love, a no compromise approach. Having everything integrated the way it is is brilliant, just a bike thought through from the ground up and with a clean sheet of paper.

I didn't think the price was unreasonable either, £8k (without the power cranks). When you think of the bigger brands with their top end frames, how much was a cervelo R5ca for example? Ok, it's A LOT of money, but for something such as this it doesn't seem to bad.

Avatar
lerrup [20 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I'm not sure that it has been thought through that radically, a Moulton or an Airnimal look like a much more clean sheet exercise to be honest.

Why have that size wheel if you don't have to? Why not disc brakes? Suspension?

I am sure there are more.

I know I am meant to be in awe of this and I know I will never ride one, but somehow it just irritates me. With that much money to spend I'd want something radical.

Avatar
Fringe [1047 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Do you get road muck and assorted guff spraying up from the front wheel through the split downtube?

Avatar
Nick T [913 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I love projects like this, some engineering firm in Diss decides to make a bike that's as wacky as they can manage. Potentially revolutionise the industry as a result. We don't do enough do this in Britain any more.

Avatar
CJSTEVENS1955 [86 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

As a very British product, its a shame that Sky are not riding these in the pro peleton

Avatar
crazy-legs [704 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
CJSTEVENS1955 wrote:

As a very British product, its a shame that Sky are not riding these in the pro peleton

It's not UCI legal. The bike isn't designed for the pro peloton, it's a concept bike to show what you can do with a little bit of out of the box thinking. From an engineering standpoint, it's very interesting and the integration of all the components, the full internal routing is the way forward.

Avatar
Bigringrider [177 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
crazy-legs wrote:

it's a concept bike to show what you can do with a little bit of out of the box thinking. From an engineering standpoint, it's very interesting and the integration of all the components, the full internal routing is the way forward.

Where is the out of the box thinking?

Integrated stem - Look
Flush stem Garmin mount - 3T
Split headtube - Wilier
Split down tube - can't remember but it'll come back to me
Integrated brakes - too many bikes and brands to name
Not forgetting the deep section carbon clinchers designed by another company and re badged

I'm sure I read somewhere that they managed to get the frame a bit more aero than a Foil but could only match it in stiffness.

Sorry but IMO this is a duff bike. It might look 'odd' but that's about it.

Avatar
Some Fella [890 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

As those great poets Daphne and Celeste once said
"U.G.L.Y You aint got no alibi! - You ugly!"

Avatar
allez neg [497 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

It's either a new Boardman or Look aero bike that has really nicely resolved brake integration - neater than this.

For innovation maybe it's time to revisit Mike Burrows and his single-sided forks and rear stays and oversized stub axles (tricky for disc brakes I suppose)

Avatar
pj [147 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

just got a little bit of sick in my mouth

Avatar
lookmanohands [119 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Split downtube....colnago carbotubo from the late 80' s/early 90's

I'd buy one

Avatar
Fringe [1047 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
lookmanohands wrote:

Split downtube....colnago carbotubo from the late 80' s/early 90's

I'd buy one

There was a titanium Colnago with split downtube in the window of the Bristol Bike Workshop last week when I went past.

Avatar
lookmanohands [119 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
Metjas [359 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I like the bar tape - what's the make?

Not that I'm considering a self build  3

Avatar
badback [302 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
Metjas wrote:

I like the bar tape - what's the make?

Not that I'm considering a self build  3

Looks like Bike Ribbon.

Avatar
Donlad [6 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I didn't get along with this bike when I rode it. The steering felt beyond fast, it was downright twitchy. And I like fast steering bikes. I suspect that the short stem length contributed to that, as well as a steep head tube. So it was interesting that you loved it and the geometry so much! The dual-crown style fork can inhibit track stands and it's really heavy for a 10 grand bike. All that said; it is bound to turn heads.

Avatar
nuzzle [19 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

As for me 7390 g is too heavy for £10K bike. I prefer exceptionally looking Bianchi Oltre XR2 which weight is 6620 g for much more affordable £6800.

Avatar
mythbuster [31 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

I want to see their aero data, at least their CFD results if they have them. I also want to see independent stiffness data.

I cannot find any information at all to substantiate their market position regarding aerodynamics or stiffness. For a bike whose main selling point is high performance, there is zero objective data available either from Factor or from a third party.

Avatar
fatbastard [24 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

The finish on the frame looks a bit naff on those close up photos. Is this the finished product or a prototype just for testing?

Avatar
Flying Scot [908 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Not for me, I prefer the 2 grand B'Twin in the other review!

We keep hearing that the rules restrict frames to 2 triangles, but I suspect that given a free reign, like this, they don't look all that different and it reinforces that bicycles are an extremely mature technology.

Avatar
Tarmac and dirt [2 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Can't afford one and wouldn't even if i could. More interested in what jacket the testers wearing please?

Avatar
853rider [18 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

.

Avatar
853rider [18 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes
CJSTEVENS1955 wrote:

As a very British product, its a shame that Sky are not riding these in the pro peleton

It's not terribly British; despite Norfolk being the centre of specialist carbon fibre development, the frames are of Taiwanese manufacture.

Avatar
hamishmct [13 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

"Very fast, very stiff and very expensive". And VERY ugly.  31

Uglier than Specializeds, and that's saying something.

Avatar
fatbastard [24 posts] 2 years ago
0 likes

Looks like Castelli kit the tester is wearing- Jersey & Tights. Could be wrong.

Pages