[Accessibility for all]

“Lord” Moylan, the chap who allegedly fell asleep during the Grenfell Inquiry, is complaining that the “pedestrian refuges” that he says he had installed have been removed due to cycling infrastructure changes.  But they’re not refuges, they’re traffic islands designed to create turning space for vehicles.

What do you see? No pedestrian refuges. Removed this week by @RBKC to make way for cycle lanes on Kensington High Street that nobody asked for. Now how do pedestrians cross safely to get the bus? Why are pedestrians less important than cyclists? pic.twitter.com/p7eLKjegXD

— Lord Moylan (@danielmgmoylan) October 4, 2020

And he’s resorting to insults now:

And you clearly don’t know the difference in design between a pedestrian refuge at a signalised crossing and one where there are no signals. You’re a fraud. /end

— Lord Moylan (@danielmgmoylan) October 8, 2020

Topic

[AlsoSomniloquism]

A very weird pedestrian

A very weird pedestrian refuge as they normall have protection to reduce drivers accidently mounting and killing said pedestrians seeking refuge. And shame for pedstrians who are differently abled as they can’t use them. 

[ktache]

He’s trying to argue with

He’s trying to argue with TheRantyHighwayman, who does the road thing for a living and has been for a good amount of time.

His blog occasionally gets a bit technical but is a good read, with a new article almost every week.

[Author]

Replies