LEJOG but avoiding nuclear bombs

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #31143
    road

    at some point, during JOGLE or LEJOG you will have to cycle past a nuclear bomb. You will not know the exact point when this happens but, it will happen. You will have to ride past, or even right over a nuclear bomb.

    Google UK’s stance on nuclear armerment. I didnt bother, I posted this as a thought experiment but theres bound to be truth in it.

     

    My spell checker dont work either, please forgive me.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #970741
    0
    craggie

    Just be sure to wear a tin

    Just be sure to wear a tin-foil helmet and you’ll be fine.

    #970739
    0
    Secret_squirrel

    The only reason we have 11*

    The only reason we have 11* speed super machines dripping in Shimano’s finest groupsets is because Japanese industry we devastated by the atomic bombing allowing it to arise Phoenix-like from clean foundations after the war.

    So a I think a little more respect is called for – don’t you?

     

    * road gears of course.  Get thee behind me 12/13 speed heretics.

     

    #970737
    0
    hawkinspeter
    bobrayner wrote:
    Thankfully, out of all the rides I’ve taken over the years, none have been disrupted by nuclear bombs. I haven’t noticed any thermonuclear warfare at all. (Maybe these Oakleys are helping).

    On the other hand, my last ride was disrupted twice by the chain getting trapped between the spokes and the big sprocket. Serves me right for trying to tweak my own limit screws. It cost me several minutes and quite a bit of swearing.

    Conclusion: Limit screws pose a much greater threat to cyclists than nuclear weapons do.

    …and why are they JIS?

    #970735
    0
    ktache

    If you ride upstream on the

    If you ride upstream on the Kennet, on the NCN 4, from Reading, you go past both Burfield Farm and Aldermarston Warf and Lock, don’t know how it’s relevent to this discussion, as my OS map shows absolutely nothing there, but there are some big fences, and security notices and some amazing lighting at night.

    #970733
    0
    Organon

    I admire your Anti-Nuclear

    I admire your Anti-Nuclear TENETs.

    #970731
    0
    bobrayner

    Thankfully, out of all the

    Thankfully, out of all the rides I’ve taken over the years, none have been disrupted by nuclear bombs. I haven’t noticed any thermonuclear warfare at all. (Maybe these Oakleys are helping).

    On the other hand, my last ride was disrupted twice by the chain getting trapped between the spokes and the big sprocket. Serves me right for trying to tweak my own limit screws. It cost me several minutes and quite a bit of swearing.

    Conclusion: Limit screws pose a much greater threat to cyclists than nuclear weapons do.

    #970729
    0
    mdavidford

    Never understood how covering

    Never understood how covering yourself in ducks was meant to help. Seems impractical on a bike anyway.

    #970727
    0
    hawkinspeter

    What’s even worse is that

    What’s even worse is that there’s a completely uncontrolled runaway nuclear reaction happening up in the sky. Luckily, it’s a long way away, but even at a distance, the radiation is dangerous and can easily cause skin burns.

    #970725
    0
    fukawitribe

    Hmmm you could be right – as

    Hmmm you could be right – as long as you can duck underneath them and cover I guess you should be OK.

    Imagine you’d got most of the way through LEJOG and your paper bag got wet just going past Faslane though, bummer….

    #970723
    0
    brooksby

    I thought it was paper bags?

    I thought it was paper bags?

    #970721
    0
    Hirsute

    That’s fridges – it worked

    That’s fridges – it worked for Indianna Jones.

    #970719
    0
    mdavidford
    OnYerBike wrote:
    mdavidford wrote:
    And not forgetting that we should all have mandatory insurance against nuclear explosions.

    Pretty sure my insurance specifically excludes nuclear explosions…

    Well then it’s just irresponsible of you to be cycling around putting all those innocent bombs at risk of blowing you up, isn’t it? 

    #970717
    0
    OnYerBike
    mdavidford wrote:
    And not forgetting that we should all have mandatory insurance against nuclear explosions.

    Pretty sure my insurance specifically excludes nuclear explosions…

    #970715
    0
    mdavidford

    And not forgetting that we

    And not forgetting that we should all have mandatory insurance against nuclear explosions.

    #970713
    0
    fukawitribe

    Reflective helmets – or

    Reflective helmets – or things painted white.

Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 19 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.