- This topic has 35 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 9 months ago by
Super Domestique.
-
CreatorTopic
-
July 13, 2013 at 5:47 pm #19364
daddyELVIS
Watch the whole video of an interview with Sky’s performance guru, or forward to just before the 5.00 minutes where his body language and speech patterns suddenly change (in response to a certain question!).
For all the Sky fanboys out there, forget he’s Sky, and forget they are the ‘best of British’ – what is your over-riding feeling from 5.00 onwards?
Truth or Lie?
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
notfastenough
@Stumpy – Right, and that’s
@Stumpy – Right, and that’s just the stuff they’re willing to discuss!@daddyelvis, no-one’s suggesting that the peloton is completely clean, but like Paul Kimmage, you seem to have a thing about Team Sky, in the face of a complete lack, not just of evidence, but even of ‘I roomed with x and saw him doping’ rumours. I think there are several more obvious candidates for your cynicism.
Simon E
I’m no expert but I’d say he
I’m no expert but I’d say he was choosing his words carefully, and with good reason!It’s been argued before that traditional winter training isn’t perfect and using races as training has some notable flaws. The weather in early spring is mostly crap, the riders pick up viruses from the bad weather and the cowshit they ride through (which inevitably gets in their digestive system), there’s the stress of travel and competition and so on.
Brad’s last book mentions his change in TT cadence but I wouldn’t read too much into that being the only reason. It wasn’t a huge change in cadence and will not have been the only thing they worked on. Also, he won’t be willing to tell his rivals what else he changed (and which may have even made a bigger difference).
Fretting about whether Sky are doping would spoil my enjoyment of the race. They have reiterated their ‘clean’ stance enough times and their much-criticised hardline policy saw the departure of some key staff so they weren’t afraid to (belatedly) make some tough decisions. If they are doping then it would be suicidal for all concerned and have repercussions of immense proportions for both BC’s well funded Olympic programme and pro cycling as a whole.
Stumps
Did some digging myself and
Did some digging myself and found this article. Very thought provoking but wont sit well with the sceptical members of the forum. Its a bit long winded but very interesting.Anyways after the 2010 season, Kerrison sat down with Brailsford to show him what Kerrison had observed and his overall conclusions. Brailsford said afterwards he was “blown away” by what Kerrison presented to him…
Here are his main conclusions…
What is startling from there primarily is how they make so much sense but due to the fact that they come from a mind which has not been whatsoever influenced by the sport and therefore does not concur with the stigmas and stereotypes which many of the tradiotional European teams have been influenced and therefore restricted by. Particularly as he says the reliance on doping, has stunted the coaching aspect of the sport whilst the best coaches and doctors in the past, have not been the ones who are the best trainers, but rather the ones who have the best doping techniques.
1) Kerrison could not understand why it was common practice for riders to use races for training.
This technique was instituted years ago due to prize money… now the top riders dont need the prize money all that much, then why do they still use the races as training and build up when they can do it in more controlled environments at their own leisure, when they were not subjected to the racing peloton who has a mind and rhythm of its own.
Yet people still believe that quality efforts would be done at the races, whilst the inter periods would be done at home for resting and lesser intensity training.
Edit: I found this quote which backs up this explanation
“Wiggins said last month, while on camp in Tenerife, that he doubted if any single day on the Dauphine would be as hard as his training in, on and around Mount Teide and he was manifestly right. To these eyes the one full day’s hit out I witnessed in Tenerife was immeasurably tougher than either of the two high mountain stages at the Dauphine”.
2) Another concept of his was “reverse periodisation”. This is what people have witnessed with Porte, Wiggins and Rogers over the past year, where they have seemed to be at peak form, a step ahead of the other riders throughout the season.
Effectively it gets rid of the athlete originally focusing on his endurance and building an aerobic base, and then only afterwards to move only on to high intensity exercises only towards the end of the training period or cycle.
And instead it makes the rider focus on introducing all the power and speed work early on and then they would gradually increase the duration of the training of those attributes as the rider’s fitness improved, AKA. in this case closer to the Tour.
In the Wiggins case this was very evident wherease many so called “experts” questioned as to whether Wiggins was not peaking a tad too early. If these “experts” had understood that the “reverse periodisation” allows Wiggins to produce maximal perfomances even prior to his peak they would have realised Wiggins was in perfect shape for the Tour.
They assumed that if riders are outputting maximal efforts then that would fastrack a rider into and out of the other side of their best form.
Once again this is another one of the misgiving which has stunted cycling and without it, it seems cyclists can perform much better.
Furthermore another example is that of Wiggins’s time trialling which as markedly improved over the past two years. This is due to the fact that Kerrison has made Wiggins race his TTs at a lowed cadence.
Indeed Sky have rightfully applauded their genius coach and Wiggins has specifically attributed his Tour win down to Kerrison’s coaching.
Some Fella
My feeling is that he is a
My feeling is that he is a massive nerd who is clearly not comfortable in front of a camera, probably has very strong views on doping and would love to name and shame those he probably knows are doping but has to answer diplomatically.
(|:
Stumps
No one likes to be asked
No one likes to be asked questions like that and i would bet even the likes of Garmins performance bloke would get the same responce.But keep digging you will probably find Lord Lucan and Elvis first.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.